|
Author
|
Topic: Who holds the Nor Cal NA 302 based ET record?
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
2003-06-27 09:07 PM
 
 
What is the 60ft/et/mph? How much does the car weigh? What is the combo? Where does the car peak?
With the following...
- Naturally aspirated
- 302 based (stroker is ok)
- 11:1 or less compression
- Hydro-roller cam
Anything goes aside form these 4 things...
Lets hear it. ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
Luke
[ June 27, 2003, 09:24 PM: Message edited by: Luke87GT ]
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
2003-06-27 09:34 PM
Excellent question! EFI or carbed?
Mike C is down to 11.30's w/ poor traction. Not sure how many locals are actually doing the max effort NA 5.0/stroker route.
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
2003-06-27 09:48 PM
Jim, I'm more interested in EFI, but I'd like to hear both.
What is Mike's combo?
Luke
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
2003-06-27 10:03 PM
Umm-
347, AFR 185's w/ port work (I think), ported Performer RPM, custom cam. I'm sure Aaron or Mike will correct any mistakes. Over 400 hp and tq at the wheels. Not bad. ![[Wink]](wink.gif)
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
92coupe
¯
Member # 1957
|
posted
2003-06-27 11:14 PM
nevermind, to much compresion for what you asked.
[ June 27, 2003, 11:15 PM: Message edited by: 92coupe ]
--------------------
94-GT BLOWN & STROKED
Posts: 1209 | From: antioch | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
2003-06-28 08:27 AM
doesn't Rhett's 347 combo make 400 to the wheels too?
--------------------
1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
AaronC
¯
Member # 86
|
posted
2003-06-28 08:30 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Luke87GT:
What is the 60ft/et/mph? How much does the car weigh? What is the combo? Where does the car peak?
With the following...
- Naturally aspirated
- 302 based (stroker is ok)
- 11:1 or less compression
- Hydro-roller cam
Anything goes aside form these 4 things...
Lets hear it.
Luke
347 11:1 Compression
AFR 185's very lightly cleaned up
Cam 244/240 108 LSA 110 ICL .576/.550something
Actually driveability is still ok with 3.73's. His mufflers are more undrivable along with solid motor mounts.
Matching ported RPM intake
Anderson NA powerpipe, 80mm MAF, 75mm TB, 42 lb injectors, Autologic chip
1 3/4 BBK headers, 3" DR. Gas X pipe, Dynomax race bullet muffs
think that's pretty much it.
His ET's will get better but best is 11.3 with a 1.73 60'. It traps 122-124 at 3300 lbs. On the dyno it made 414 RWHP at 5900/6000 RPM SAE corrected and 416 RWTQ at 5000. It made 400+ RWHP from 5100-6500 RPM. It just makes tremendous power everywhere. lights the tires off on 2nd gear stabs with Nittos. I could arrange a ride for you ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
--------------------
1991 GT Convertible: Stock 157k mile shortblock, HiTech cam, AFR 165 heads, Edelbrock RPM intake, 1 3/4 headers
12.23 at 112.99
Best MPH 113.97
Posts: 776 | From: woodland | Registered: Dec 2000
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
2003-06-28 11:19 AM
quote:
Originally posted by AaronC:
quote:
Originally posted by Luke87GT:
What is the 60ft/et/mph? How much does the car weigh? What is the combo? Where does the car peak?
With the following...
- Naturally aspirated
- 302 based (stroker is ok)
- 11:1 or less compression
- Hydro-roller cam
Anything goes aside form these 4 things...
Lets hear it.
Luke
347 11:1 Compression
AFR 185's very lightly cleaned up
Cam 244/240 108 LSA 110 ICL .576/.550something
Actually driveability is still ok with 3.73's. His mufflers are more undrivable along with solid motor mounts.
Matching ported RPM intake
Anderson NA powerpipe, 80mm MAF, 75mm TB, 42 lb injectors, Autologic chip
1 3/4 BBK headers, 3" DR. Gas X pipe, Dynomax race bullet muffs
think that's pretty much it.
His ET's will get better but best is 11.3 with a 1.73 60'. It traps 122-124 at 3300 lbs. On the dyno it made 414 RWHP at 5900/6000 RPM SAE corrected and 416 RWTQ at 5000. It made 400+ RWHP from 5100-6500 RPM. It just makes tremendous power everywhere. lights the tires off on 2nd gear stabs with Nittos. I could arrange a ride for you
Pretty remarkable. I wonder what the driveability is like (idle, 1800rpm cruise characteristics, etc). You guys could make make a business giving joy rides in that thing. Like a Great America ride...
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
2003-06-28 11:24 AM
Also, Aaron is this car the record holder for the criteria I gave above? Anyone faster?
Looks like there is a 10 in there if he can get that launch sorted out... 1.5X region
Luke
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
KCmustangboy
¯
Member # 1927
|
posted
2003-06-28 12:51 PM
302 stock non stroker would be John M. 11.92
--------------------
03 Cobra... Factory long block, with Whipple and AED tune... 812rwhp 10.0s @ 140... almost there!
WWW.AEDHP.COM
Posts: 1691 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
2003-06-28 12:55 PM
quote:
Originally posted by KCmustangboy:
302 stock non stroker would be John M. 11.92
KCmustangboy, do you know the race weight of that white coupe? Also, does anyone have a dyno printout of this car? If I recall it made in the 330rwhp range
Luke
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
2003-06-28 01:54 PM
Here's Rehtt's rear whell, but I think he has made a change since then.
88 LX
342, AFR 185's, XE274, Performer RPM Intake, 70mm TB, FMS 70mm MAF, stock air box, 1 5/8 LT's, 3.73's
365 RWHP 380 RWTQ
11.49 119.0 mph
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
2003-06-28 02:09 PM
quote:
Originally posted by FasterDamnit:
Here's Rehtt's rear whell, but I think he has made a change since then.
88 LX
342, AFR 185's, XE274, Performer RPM Intake, 70mm TB, FMS 70mm MAF, stock air box, 1 5/8 LT's, 3.73's
365 RWHP 380 RWTQ
11.49 119.0 mph
wow, equally remarkable for the parts that he has. Pretty good ET/mph with the power he is making...
What about you Jim? Where do you stand? How is your progress coming and whats new with the green car?
Luke
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
2003-06-28 02:18 PM
Well,
I have put in a new cam and got the mph up in the 113's. traction has been bad, especially since the bushings went bad in my "new" control arms. Replaced them last weekend. So still stuck in the 12.1's-12.2's on a cool night.
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
season'd 88
¯
Member # 169
|
posted
2003-06-28 03:17 PM
quote:
Originally posted by FasterDamnit:
Here's Rehtt's rear whell, but I think he has made a change since then.
88 LX
342, AFR 185's, XE274, Performer RPM Intake, 70mm TB, FMS 70mm MAF, stock air box, 1 5/8 LT's, 3.73's
365 RWHP 380 RWTQ
11.49 119.0 mph
ya Jim, i put that big pulley on my pwr steering.....uuuuuhhh
Posts: 1383 | Registered: Feb 2001
| :
|
|
jmcclesk
Moderator
Member # 1355
|
posted
2003-06-28 09:28 PM
weight race ready with driver and gas 3070-3100 lbs and it put out 335-337 to the rear wheels. It has been so long i cant rember which one 335 or 337. best time 11.92@115.188 with a 1.63 60 foot time.
kc mustang JON not JOHN.
Arronc- how much does mike charge for a ride ill pay
[ June 28, 2003, 09:44 PM: Message edited by: jmcclesk ]
--------------------
Ford trained ASE master tech.
Posts: 4024 | From: marrysville | Registered: May 2002
| :
|
|
KCmustangboy
¯
Member # 1927
|
posted
2003-06-29 12:23 PM
quote:
Originally posted by jmcclesk:
weight race ready with driver and gas 3070-3100 lbs and it put out 335-337 to the rear wheels. It has been so long i cant rember which one 335 or 337. best time 11.92@115.188 with a 1.63 60 foot time.
kc mustang JON not JOHN.
Arronc- how much does mike charge for a ride ill pay
Sorry JON, Stupidity must run in the family
--------------------
03 Cobra... Factory long block, with Whipple and AED tune... 812rwhp 10.0s @ 140... almost there!
WWW.AEDHP.COM
Posts: 1691 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
AaronC
¯
Member # 86
|
posted
2003-06-30 06:57 AM
quote:
Originally posted by jmcclesk:
Arronc- how much does mike charge for a ride ill pay
Bwahahaha, too funny. No charge, lol. Actually I don't anticipate him even driving his car much anymore. He just bought a damn motorcylce.
--------------------
1991 GT Convertible: Stock 157k mile shortblock, HiTech cam, AFR 165 heads, Edelbrock RPM intake, 1 3/4 headers
12.23 at 112.99
Best MPH 113.97
Posts: 776 | From: woodland | Registered: Dec 2000
| :
|
|
7.3L White Whale
¯
Member # 1848
|
posted
2003-06-30 11:33 AM
I'd like a ride, ill pay money and hand wash it in a bikini after if hed like.
--------------------
444 cubic inches and a 105mm turbo.
2001 gt.... sold
02 wrx... shits in the works
Posts: 493 | From: livermore | Registered: Sep 2002
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
