|
Author
|
Topic: Which Cam????
|
Jerm95gt
Diapers
Member # 1239
|
posted
 
 
I got edelbrock 6037's and keeping stock injectors. 1.7 rr's
I ordered a crane2031 but its back ordered for a few days.......i'm thinking maybe I should have gotten the e303.......does anyone know hte pro's/cons of them.......I like a cool idle but im also all about reliablity... and power....thanks
--------------------
I miss you StoplightWarrior :(
Posts: 627 | From: Martinez | Registered: May 2002
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
I just swapped out an E303 on 91PONY's car. Swapped it for the X & it idles as smooth as the E.
I swapped the cam, ported the lower intake to match the heads, & swapped the BBK high-flow catted H for an off-road BBK X & gained ~4mph in the 1/4. She went from running 105mph to 109mph.
She runs 1.6 rockers.
For 1.7's the B will perform nearly as well.
All of these cams will pass smog.
BTW...the cam was NOT put in dot-to-dot. ![[Wink]](wink.gif)
--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4266 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
Stimson
_
Member # 51
|
posted
91PONY had good luck with the X cam. 67stang ran similar or slighly better numbers with another cam, I forgot the maker, but it wasn't FMS, comp or crane.
Posts: 2373 | Registered: Jun 2000
| :
|
|
Jerm95gt
Diapers
Member # 1239
|
posted
is the ecam as reliable as the crane 2031 etc..
if the power is the same, the reliability is the same, and the ecam just sounds cooler i kinda want it instead.
[ June 03, 2003, 03:30 PM: Message edited by: Jerm95gt ]
--------------------
I miss you StoplightWarrior :(
Posts: 627 | From: Martinez | Registered: May 2002
| :
|
|
MR GO FAST
¯
Member # 2088
|
posted
ECAM ![[dance]](graemlins/dance.gif)
--------------------
1986 Gt that is faster than FOSTANGS pinto
Posts: 3729 | From: ATWATER/SANJO/RWC | Registered: Nov 2002
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
IMO the E is not as good as the 2031.
But with 1.7's it's better then 1.6's.
I'm not impressed with the performance of the E.
For blown applications it's better....but for N/A...there's better cams that are the same price (~$100 used) & will give better performance.
The E has been known to give idle fits. I've been able to make them idle smooth as low as 700rpm, but that's on the more tolerant Fox-body computers.
Of course...the X & B are no better at idling.
[ June 03, 2003, 03:35 PM: Message edited by: 93PONY ]
--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4266 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
MR GO FAST
¯
Member # 2088
|
posted
I agree on that 93pony. I will have a custom one done for myself eventually. I got my Ecam cheap and it runs goods for my 150hp 302 ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
--------------------
1986 Gt that is faster than FOSTANGS pinto
Posts: 3729 | From: ATWATER/SANJO/RWC | Registered: Nov 2002
| :
|
|
66 AC COBRA
Nitrous King
Member # 904
|
posted
the e cam isnt bad with 1.7's, thats what i have, but i would rather have a b cam if i was gonna stick with ford alphabet soup
--------------------
FFR AC Cobra
72 Vega - WCHRA Extreme 10.5
Posts: 6280 | From: Winters | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
There's a guy on the Corral named Glenn (screenname) that ran 11.8s @ 114 w those heads and a 'baby' crower cam. Might poke around and do a search on the corral to find which one, or just PM him and ask.
[ June 03, 2003, 04:06 PM: Message edited by: shade-tree ]
--------------------
1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by st5150:
91PONY had good luck with the X cam. 67stang ran similar or slighly better numbers with another cam, I forgot the maker, but it wasn't FMS, comp or crane.
Lunati 51023, specifications are 215/224 duration at 0.050" lift, and .522" lift on both the intake and exhaust valve. The cam has a lobe separation angle of 112 degrees. Edelbrock 6037's, and Performer intake. (In an '88 LX)
12.85 @ 108.2 on 1.76 60ft.
http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2001/08/efimotor/index.shtml
--------------------
'92 LX T5
Looked stock, went 11's 11.90 at 115mph.
'65 Mustang 347
www.fordmuscle.com
Livin' in the Carolina Pines
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
AaronC
¯
Member # 86
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by shade-tree:
There's a guy on the Corral named Glenn (screenname) that ran 11.8s @ 114 w those heads and a 'baby' crower cam. Might poke around and do a search on the corral to find which one, or just PM him and ask.
the baby crower (pt. # 15510) is a 212/212 114 LSA .531/.531 cam. Glenn ran the 15512 cam 222/228 112 lsa .496/.512 His car (11.8 coupe) is also 2900-3000 lbs. That same setup ran a high 12 at 107 in his 95 cobra too
--------------------
1991 GT Convertible: Stock 157k mile shortblock, HiTech cam, AFR 165 heads, Edelbrock RPM intake, 1 3/4 headers
12.23 at 112.99
Best MPH 113.97
Posts: 776 | From: woodland | Registered: Dec 2000
| :
|
|
ci$ko
¯
Member # 2425
|
posted
im lookin for a good powerfull cam...i want a something that is very aggressive...any suggestions?
i am going to put a blower on down the line..but in the mean time imm doing a h/c/i and i was thinkin about the ford victor jr heads or gt-40s or the trick flows not sure which ones yet
--------------------
2000 GT for sale
89 lx burning up slicks at a track near you
91 bottled gt sold :/
72 chevelle
Posts: 1286 | From: valleJo .7o7. | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 1 FLy5Oh:
im lookin for a good powerfull cam...i want a something that is very aggressive...any suggestions?
i am going to put a blower on down the line..but in the mean time imm doing a h/c/i and i was thinkin about the ford victor jr heads or gt-40s or the trick flows not sure which ones yet
Vic Jr's are great for blown...so are TW's... Personally I like the Highports even better...or some AFR185's.
You don't need an aggressive cam to make gobs of power with a blower. But...there are plenty of mild street cams that'll give plenty of power N/A & perform quite well with a blower.
Compcams XE274HR on a 112LSA is one of them.
TFS stage 1 does pretty good blown, but not so hot N/A. TFS stage 2 does better N/A & Blown...but I'd opt for the XE274 first.
The limitation is smog...only one of those cams will pass the sniffer.
[ June 03, 2003, 09:58 PM: Message edited by: 93PONY ]
--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4266 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
ci$ko
¯
Member # 2425
|
posted
well im waiting on the blower...about 6 months...but my car is going to need smog in the next month and it will pass asside from the o/r pipe....but as soon as i get that done im going to put in the h/c/i..so untill then i want a mean ass sounding cam that runs as hard as it sounds =)
--------------------
2000 GT for sale
89 lx burning up slicks at a track near you
91 bottled gt sold :/
72 chevelle
Posts: 1286 | From: valleJo .7o7. | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
