T O P I C R E V I E W
|
bunchmyfunky
Member # 360
|
posted
Here are the results from the Plasma Booster. Please take the time to read the entire article. It should answer just about all your questions. The article is on the leftside -tech department first one at the top called Fire Away.
www.fordmuscle.com
|
99gt-UJSTLST
Member # 584
|
posted
hey what type of plugs were you runing
I was thinking of getting this for my car but have not decided it will be this or the new plugs think they call uridium
|
Andrew WOT
Member # 1249
|
posted
Great article, thanks.
|
bunchmyfunky
Member # 360
|
posted
Javier, I'm running NGKs TR-55s gapped somewhere in the low 40s.
Andrew, Thanks this was the first time that I had seen the article also. Jim and Chirag did a great job on it. Thanks guys
|
hidnn.o.s.
Member # 1219
|
posted
Congrats
|
281n/a
Member # 1465
|
posted
damn mark you need a dyno tune that 244rwhp seems low compared to a lot of bolt on gt's add some longtubes and a dyno tune chip you will see about 260-265rw great article
|
bunchmyfunky
Member # 360
|
posted
244rwhp running 12s can't complain about that. I doubt I would see those kind of gains with a custom chip, I think 5rwhp at most. I do have an OR H pipe going on next week, so we will see if that helps.
|
shade-tree
Member # 298
|
posted
where those SAE corrected dyno results?
|
bunchmyfunky
Member # 360
|
posted
yup those are corrected numbers
|
st5150
Member # 51
|
posted
Great story. I like the track test -dyno- re-track test idea. Looking at the dyno graph, you probably have 2-4 rwhp to be gained by leaning out your air fuel ratio half a point up top. Did you play with the timing at all on the dyno?
|
bunchmyfunky
Member # 360
|
posted
We didn't change the timing, it was set to 14degree's.
|
yesIdid
Member # 58
|
posted
The #s look right (RWHP) Mark. You have to subtract around 10 rwhp for the 4.10s. You're probably in the 255 range .
Nice article Jim...
|
LX Pony
Member # 2216
|
posted
I thought In the MMFF article that they got bigger gains by moving the timing back...supposedly it needs less timing to be effective? Either way, that's one quick 4.6!
|
Bullitt208
Member # 441
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by LX Pony: I thought In the MMFF article that they got bigger gains by moving the timing back...supposedly it needs less timing to be effective? Either way, that's one quick 4.6!
That's a shocker! MM&FF got unrealistic gains on a product they tested. [ December 19, 2002, 01:52 PM: Message edited by: Bullitt208 ]
|
4.6 EATIN GM'S
Member # 1633
|
posted
do they make it for the 96 to 98 motors too?
|
93PONY
Member # 60
|
posted
Great article! Drew's gonna be famous!
....man I want to get my hands on your cams Mark. Those power curves show a lot of potential! [ December 19, 2002, 04:02 PM: Message edited by: 93PONY ]
|
FasterDamnit
Member # 442
|
posted
Oh yes. Bump them up 400-500 and then lean above 4k by about 1 point (MAFterburner!). What do you think, 4mph?
JKL
|
93PONY
Member # 60
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by FasterDamnit: Oh yes. Bump them up 400-500 and then lean above 4k by about 1 point (MAFterburner!). What do you think, 4mph?
JKL
Hmm...let see. Moving the torque curve up 4-500rpm would definately make a difference! I'll be conservative & say Drew will run 107's consistantly.
|
Quick 88LX
Member # 1950
|
posted
Hey BUNCH: Merry Christmas bro!
|
FasterDamnit
Member # 442
|
posted
www.ignitionsolutions.com
I think they have a kit for 96-98.
|
bunchmyfunky
Member # 360
|
posted
quote: Hey BUNCH: Merry Christmas bro!
LOL Thanks. We will have to get a mini cruise together for a run up to the lake.
|
98slowhoe
Member # 895
|
posted
Great Numbers mark.....I know your car can do alot more I know it can. I think that H will help it out a little if not hey man atleast its louder! Can't wait till the weight plan comes into effect!
|