|
Author
|
Topic: wich cold air intake???
|
liftedF150
¯
Member # 868
|
posted
 
 
ok i am thinking about going with the densicharger system for my 91 5.0, anybody have this on there car, if so how do you like it???
any other suggestions would be nice to thx
--------------------
GO SHARKS!
Posts: 3259 | From: Discovery Bay | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
StoplightWarrior
¯
Member # 211
|
posted
densecharger is good...we have a MAC chrome cold air kit on the 94 cobra...made a niiiice gain, you can hear it, and it looks great.
--------------------
2000 GT
couple bolt ons
Check out the website: peep it
Posts: 2952 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Mar 2001
| :
|
|
cobraman_1994
¯
Member # 467
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by StoplightWarrior:
densecharger is good...we have a MAC chrome cold air kit on the 94 cobra...you can hear it, and it looks great.
and thats about it. lol ![[Wink]](wink.gif) , i had the same one on my 94 cobra, and it didnt do shit. id spend a little more and get the densecharger ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
86 GT
Posts: 4882 | From: eldorado hills | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
PeNiNsula302
¯
Member # 1061
|
posted
BBK one seems to work fine for me....showed good gain, just seemed to be a tad more "beefy" on the throttle and it also looks good!
Posts: 3423 | Registered: Mar 2002
| :
|
|
OFFROAD PIPE
¯
Member # 1607
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by PeNiNsula302:
BBK one seems to work fine for me....showed good gain, just seemed to be a tad more "beefy" on the throttle and it also looks good!
yeah, the bbk cai helped mine a lot.
--------------------
ARGUING ON THE INTERNET IS LIKE THE SPECIAL OLYMPICS, EVEN IF YOU WIN, YOURE STILL RETARDED.
Posts: 864 | From: Anaheim Hills, | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
ash
¯
Member # 1523
|
posted
another vote for the dense
--------------------
04 gixxer 600
01 gt buncha stuff.
Posts: 305 | From: south bay | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
01YellowCobra
¯
Member # 600
|
posted
I have the densecharger on my 01 - can't say whether it gave me any HP gains (no dynos to back that up) but SOTP, it worked very well. Throttle response seems quicker, engine "sounds" stronger, as as far as I'm concerned... no regrets.
Posts: 150 | Registered: Dec 2001
| :
|
|
Gear Head
JARED
Member # 779
|
posted
Brian go with the densecharger, it will look the best on your car and have never heard really any negative things about them.
--------------------
Support our troops!
Posts: 5685 | From: EASTBAY | Registered: Jan 2002
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
I have the Anderson Ford Motorsports NA powerpipe, it works well. I don't think it much matters which one you get although IMHO the BBK kit is crap (I have/had it)
--------------------
1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
blackcobra98
¯
Member # 1078
|
posted
I had a densecharger on my '98 for a few months, and it worked great. I also had the MAC chrome kit for about a year, and it sucked compared to the densecharger. Go with the densecharger. I would still have mine on, but I was unable to squeeze it underneath my strut towerbar without cracking/creasing the intake piping ![[Frown]](frown.gif) .
--------------------
1998 Cobra #2892/3480-**SOLD 7/2/03**
2004 Lightning #1632/3781-**SOLD 8/06**
Posts: 687 | Registered: Mar 2002
| :
|
|
liftedF150
¯
Member # 868
|
posted
ya i think im goign to go with the desicharger, glad my b-day is coming up in 20 days ![[Smile]](smile.gif) , guese what we get to put on my car soon jared
--------------------
GO SHARKS!
Posts: 3259 | From: Discovery Bay | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
GTChink
¯
Member # 293
|
posted
homemade. $35 + a 9" K&N Filter in front of the front tire. ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
--------------------
1999 GT Twin Screwedsold.
Posts: 477 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
PeNiNsula302
¯
Member # 1061
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by shade-tree:
although IMHO the BBK kit is crap (I have/had it)
Really why do you say that?
Posts: 3423 | Registered: Mar 2002
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
doesn't fit right, the rubber fittings age easily, it's made of some chromed metal which traps heat exactly where you don't want it...
did I say BBK is crap btw? Any product they make is monkey-engineered and "guaranteed to fit with a deadblow hammer and sweat"
--------------------
1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
Gear Head
JARED
Member # 779
|
posted
I have installed two densechargers and have talked to many people with the cold air kit and from my expiernces I belive that the BBK fits and looks better. If you are going for show and go get the BBk but if you are going all performance get the densecharger.
--------------------
Support our troops!
Posts: 5685 | From: EASTBAY | Registered: Jan 2002
| :
|
|
|
|
DropTopFox
drama
Member # 1689
|
posted
I have the densecharger on my 95 gt and it definately worked great. I had a K&N with the tornado air intake piece before I put it on and I still noticed a little gain. I have no knowledge of this but I hear that the densecharger is a better buy because the chrom CAI's attract too much heat and defeat the purpose where the plastic densecharger doesn't attract so much heat. The only thing I have against it is that it was harder to install than a BBK in some respects however the BBK also had it's downside especially on your car. WIth BBK you have to have someone hold the damn filter in the fender from under the car while someone maneuvers the pipe onto the filter then the filter has to be tightened from under the car too. ![[Mad]](mad.gif) The Densecharger is black and instead of tightening them with those rings like BBK's the give you screws which on two black pieces it takes forever to match up the holes. I know nothing about MAC except I hear MAC is crap. Good Luck
--------------------
Go out and do something for yourself today everyone, quit depending on others
-Me
http://www.CaliforniaFords.com/cgi-bin/album.pl?album=00001689
Posts: 4003 | From: San Bruno | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
liftedF150
¯
Member # 868
|
posted
so how long did it take you to install it?
--------------------
GO SHARKS!
Posts: 3259 | From: Discovery Bay | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
Gear Head
JARED
Member # 779
|
posted
Brian does it matter you know I will be doing it anyways itll take like 10-15minutes if that.
--------------------
Support our troops!
Posts: 5685 | From: EASTBAY | Registered: Jan 2002
| :
|
|
liftedF150
¯
Member # 868
|
posted
hahahah hey ill hand you tools ![[dance]](graemlins/dance.gif)
--------------------
GO SHARKS!
Posts: 3259 | From: Discovery Bay | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
DropTopFox
drama
Member # 1689
|
posted
Well I have a 95 so we had to glue the mass air meter to the densechager with silcone glue provided by densecharger which was a pain in the ass not likt on you car but it took about 45 mins maybe an hour cause there is so much shit to pull apart on my car just to get the mass air meter. It took us like 10-15 minutes to get the BBK piping on but then it was a bitch to get the filter on from under the car especially without a jack. Fucking BBK decides to give you a filter that doesn't fit through the cut out in your fender. Assholes!!!!!!
--------------------
Go out and do something for yourself today everyone, quit depending on others
-Me
http://www.CaliforniaFords.com/cgi-bin/album.pl?album=00001689
Posts: 4003 | From: San Bruno | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
y2kgt01
¯
Member # 1257
|
posted
seriously i had my cold air intake-bbk on it like 5 mins then i look at the filter an was like how the fuck does this get in the fenderwell? standing there puzzled trying to figure out what i was gonna do took like 30 mins. i ended up just pullin the wheel well plastic
Posts: 748 | Registered: May 2002
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
