Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
Tech Talk
»
Horsepower figures for a 331
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by 93Snyper: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by AaronC: [qb]IMO the X cam would be better than the TFS #2 cam. It shares the same intake lobe but will have a smaller exhaust lobe for less exhaust overlap. That should help smog even more. Probably would gain more power too in an NA application.[/qb][/QUOTE]I'm following you guys here ... but does this imply that the less duration and lift on the exhaust is better for smog???? Last time i was at the track i saw a stang with 331, E, AFR 165s & Performer RPM with a weight of 3300, best run was at 108 is this about right considering the cam? [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com