Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
Tech Talk
»
Anything to heads but flow numbers?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by John91coupe: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by 93PONY: Let me just throw out one more thing.... Cross-section of the port also matters. This ties in with velocity. EI, a smaller cross-section port that flows 300cfm is more efficient then a larger cross-section port that flows 300cfm. Even if the CC volume is the same.[/QB][/QUOTE]Yep, that is definitely true and I see your point, especially with the TW valve being rotated toward the intake port and having a shorter runner length. It is difficult to compare apples-to-apples in this case so as usual..."the devil is in the details". My intake port has a 1262 cross section so there are a lot of variables to consider. [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com