Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
Tech Talk
»
AFR 185 vs. Edelbrock?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by EPIK: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by blown95svt: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by EPIK: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by blown95svt: [qb] why not just port them? i have a set of gt40x heads that will most likely flow the same or better than a 185 :p [/qb][/QUOTE]Thats the plan. I would rather throw the money into the shortblock, cam, & BIGGER longtubes. I think they are already mildly cleaned up, but I want to put a GOOD port on them... [/qb][/QUOTE]my heads are just gt40x heads that have been gasket matched to felpro 1262 on intake 1415 on exhuast, the exhuast ports were raise 1/4 in exstensive work done on bowls and runners. ferra race valves 1.94/ and had 1.6's installed. 5 angle valve job and they are ready to go! you have 2.02s so it will be a better route than my 1.94, but port them and be done with it! you would be amazed at what a lil port/clean up and a good valve job will do:patriot: [/qb][/QUOTE]Good info... Thanks Brandon. Those were my thoughts too, why drop another $1500 on new heads? [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com