|
Author
|
Topic: Horse power you guys think???
|
eastoaklandss
¯
Member # 8011
|
posted
 
 
How much you guys think I'm lil cuz will get with this set up 70 mm throttle body and spacer eldelbrock rpm 2 upper and lower intake eldelbrock rpm aluminum heads 1.6 RR double roller timing chain under drive pulleys 28 lbs injectors flat top pistons the brand is Hypereutectic LMK wat you Guys think...
--------------------
1970 chevelle ls2 6spd
1989 6.0 ls2 notchback
1999 camaro ss 10.3 @130 old setup/13.7 @114 new setup lol
1986 5.0 t-bird
1991 notchback charged
Posts: 411 | From: Oakland/Hayward | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
eastoaklandss
¯
Member # 8011
|
posted
forgot to say its a 306 .30 over
--------------------
1970 chevelle ls2 6spd
1989 6.0 ls2 notchback
1999 camaro ss 10.3 @130 old setup/13.7 @114 new setup lol
1986 5.0 t-bird
1991 notchback charged
Posts: 411 | From: Oakland/Hayward | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
SAV650HAB
¯
Member # 10324
|
posted
293 ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
SAVAGE HABITS 'CAR CLUB' VP 650/510/707/209
NOR-CAL KINGZ....... YAH 2 CHAINZ!!!!!!
"WE OUT HERE" 7th ST....STEP IT UP A NOTCH
88 coupe FTW!
Posts: 5091 | From: SHOREVIEW E.S SAN MATEO | Registered: Sep 2010
| :
|
|
Greasy
¯
Member # 5258
|
posted
260RW
--------------------
'93 Cobra-Coyote Powered
'03 DSG Cobra
'13 Dodge Cummins
'14 Rubicon X
Posts: 3272 | From: North Dallas | Registered: Jan 2005
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
With the right camshaft it should hit 300+
--------------------
1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
eastoaklandss
¯
Member # 8011
|
posted
Custom cam for the motor
--------------------
1970 chevelle ls2 6spd
1989 6.0 ls2 notchback
1999 camaro ss 10.3 @130 old setup/13.7 @114 new setup lol
1986 5.0 t-bird
1991 notchback charged
Posts: 411 | From: Oakland/Hayward | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by eastoaklandss:
Custom cam for the motor
What compression?
--------------------
1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
eastoaklandss
¯
Member # 8011
|
posted
Dude b4 was running afr heads it was 11:1 idk if it will be that high wit the Eddies aluminum rpm heads
--------------------
1970 chevelle ls2 6spd
1989 6.0 ls2 notchback
1999 camaro ss 10.3 @130 old setup/13.7 @114 new setup lol
1986 5.0 t-bird
1991 notchback charged
Posts: 411 | From: Oakland/Hayward | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
eastoaklandss
¯
Member # 8011
|
posted
It seems like it takes a lot for these things to go fast
--------------------
1970 chevelle ls2 6spd
1989 6.0 ls2 notchback
1999 camaro ss 10.3 @130 old setup/13.7 @114 new setup lol
1986 5.0 t-bird
1991 notchback charged
Posts: 411 | From: Oakland/Hayward | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by eastoaklandss:
It seems like it takes a lot for these things to go fast
What do you consider "fast"
They are the best bang for the buck out there and you can go fast on a budget.....
Not sure what you mean???
--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?
I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
coupedup
¯
Member # 9987
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by eastoaklandss:
Dude b4 was running afr heads it was 11:1 idk if it will be that high wit the Eddies aluminum rpm heads
That will depend upon the Combustion chamber size of the EDL heads that you will be using, the smaller the combustion chamber size the higher the compression ratio will be and vice versa.
[ September 21, 2012, 01:51 AM: Message edited by: Nifty50 ]
Posts: 4406 | From: Ca | Registered: May 2010
| :
|
|
eastoaklandss
¯
Member # 8011
|
posted
The whole going fast thing was me just having a sence of humor..
--------------------
1970 chevelle ls2 6spd
1989 6.0 ls2 notchback
1999 camaro ss 10.3 @130 old setup/13.7 @114 new setup lol
1986 5.0 t-bird
1991 notchback charged
Posts: 411 | From: Oakland/Hayward | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
eastoaklandss
¯
Member # 8011
|
posted
The machine shop told me the heads are 60cc
--------------------
1970 chevelle ls2 6spd
1989 6.0 ls2 notchback
1999 camaro ss 10.3 @130 old setup/13.7 @114 new setup lol
1986 5.0 t-bird
1991 notchback charged
Posts: 411 | From: Oakland/Hayward | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
eastoaklandss
¯
Member # 8011
|
posted
I don't know for sure tho
--------------------
1970 chevelle ls2 6spd
1989 6.0 ls2 notchback
1999 camaro ss 10.3 @130 old setup/13.7 @114 new setup lol
1986 5.0 t-bird
1991 notchback charged
Posts: 411 | From: Oakland/Hayward | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
If the heads are 60cc then u need to figure out what kind of pistons are in the motor..a stock shortblock with edelbrock heads and a custom cam should be able to hit 300+hp ...with some compression it should make a lil more..
--------------------
1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
eastoaklandss
¯
Member # 8011
|
posted
The flap top pistons called Hypereutectic and its a short block bored 30 over
--------------------
1970 chevelle ls2 6spd
1989 6.0 ls2 notchback
1999 camaro ss 10.3 @130 old setup/13.7 @114 new setup lol
1986 5.0 t-bird
1991 notchback charged
Posts: 411 | From: Oakland/Hayward | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
.30 over isn't a major difference unless you raise the compression or build a stroker motor..stock 5.0s are 9:1 or 9.5:1..you need to raise the compression to at least 10:1 to see a gain from a 306..
--------------------
1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
eastoaklandss
¯
Member # 8011
|
posted
It has high compression flat top pistons in it I can't run a charger it's faster 10:1 or higher
--------------------
1970 chevelle ls2 6spd
1989 6.0 ls2 notchback
1999 camaro ss 10.3 @130 old setup/13.7 @114 new setup lol
1986 5.0 t-bird
1991 notchback charged
Posts: 411 | From: Oakland/Hayward | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
eastoaklandss
¯
Member # 8011
|
posted
Would post pics but don't know how to upload them
--------------------
1970 chevelle ls2 6spd
1989 6.0 ls2 notchback
1999 camaro ss 10.3 @130 old setup/13.7 @114 new setup lol
1986 5.0 t-bird
1991 notchback charged
Posts: 411 | From: Oakland/Hayward | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
95gtdrop
¯
Member # 7478
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by eastoaklandss:
It seems like it takes a lot for these things to go fast
shit actually they will hang with the big boys with a few mods. my brother has a couple bolt ons and isnt too far off from me in my mostly stock 97 cobra. once he regears and puts his HCI setup on, im in deep trouble.
--------------------
1997 SVT cobra SOLD;(
2004 SVT Cobra Vert
Posts: 1221 | From: sacramento | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
92_5.0
¯
Member # 7624
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Jaejae5.0:
.30 over isn't a major difference unless you raise the compression or build a stroker motor..stock 5.0s are 9:1 or 9.5:1..you need to raise the compression to at least 10:1 to see a gain from a 306..
stock 5.0 engines are 8:7:1 comp. ratio
--------------------
Infineon/Sears point? same difference!
11.8 @ 115 mph @ Sac Raceway
411 rwhp 402 trq (old set up)
540 rwhp 517 rwtrq (new set up)
ET's to come
Posts: 1629 | From: bay area | Registered: May 2007
| :
|
|
50DADDY
CAFords OG
Member # 3076
|
posted
280-290 rear wheel.
Posts: 4827 | From: Suckramento | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
Jaejae5.0
¯
Member # 7958
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 92_5.0:
quote:
Originally posted by Jaejae5.0:
.30 over isn't a major difference unless you raise the compression or build a stroker motor..stock 5.0s are 9:1 or 9.5:1..you need to raise the compression to at least 10:1 to see a gain from a 306..
stock 5.0 engines are 8:7:1 comp. ratio
wow..did not know that..these things are blower ready ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
--------------------
1987 notchback h/c/i 302 & 70mm turbo SOLD
2000 camaro ss cam only
Posts: 4890 | From: the combustion chamber | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 92_5.0:
quote:
Originally posted by Jaejae5.0:
.30 over isn't a major difference unless you raise the compression or build a stroker motor..stock 5.0s are 9:1 or 9.5:1..you need to raise the compression to at least 10:1 to see a gain from a 306..
stock 5.0 engines are 8:7:1 comp. ratio
Compression ratio of 87-92 HO roller motor is 9.0:1-9.2:1 depending on chamber spec which varies.
The 5.0 you speak of is a non HO motor.
--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?
I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
Also most cheap oversized replacement pistons have larger cc reliefs and even different compression height, along with the larger bore just drops the compression more and more which is why it is hard to go wrong with the ring and bearing jobs on stock TRW slugs, unless you go to a better aftermarket piston such as JE, Diamond and even JEs line of SRP pistons.
I cant stand this "306 hype" its a buncha bullshit unless you build a nice lil 306 with good pistons and balance job which becomes a null point since 100 bux more gets you 20-45 more cubes....
Dan
--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?
I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
