|
Author
|
Topic: 91 lincoln lsc 5.0 H.O in a 92 5.0 stang
|
migs66/92
¯
Member # 4811
|
posted
 
 
i have a very good running 91 lincoln lsc with a low milage h.o 5.0.The engine on my 92 mustang looks like it took a shit would i be able to put this engine in my mustang with out any problems?
--------------------
Ill keep my guns and my money, you can have the change
Posts: 343 | From: lodi ,cal | Registered: Aug 2004
| :
|
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
Yup.
--------------------
'92 LX T5
Looked stock, went 11's 11.90 at 115mph.
'65 Mustang 347
www.fordmuscle.com
Livin' in the Carolina Pines
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
94_5.0
¯
Member # 6130
|
posted
Yea.... ![[burnout]](graemlins/burnout.gif)
--------------------
94 5.0 VERT>> (TOTALED, IDIOT DRIVERS) Obama 50% white 50% black 100% Genious.
Posts: 510 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Oct 2005
| :
|
|
NO MANRZ
¯
Member # 566
|
posted
The lincoln comes with crap intake/cam/heads/pistons right?
--------------------
Bring It . . .
Posts: 1938 | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
kingmoochr
¯
Member # 5834
|
posted
the lincoln is a ho motor, the cougar and tbird were non ho, so they for sure dont have the same parts, the lincoln may
[ November 15, 2005, 02:50 AM: Message edited by: kingmoochr ]
Posts: 880 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
silverLX
¯
Member # 3207
|
posted
It will work no problem, just need to change some accessory brakets.
--------------------
88LX hatch 410w
88LX vert gears, exhaust
95GT H/C/I
Posts: 1613 | From: Sonoma County | Registered: Aug 2003
| :
|
|
migs66/92
¯
Member # 4811
|
posted
yeah i think the lincoln engine is the same as the mustang 5.0 execpt for the accesories, it even has the same firing order which i think is different than a non h.o
--------------------
Ill keep my guns and my money, you can have the change
Posts: 343 | From: lodi ,cal | Registered: Aug 2004
| :
|
|
PWR HNGRY 302
¯
Member # 6000
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by NO MANRZ:
The lincoln comes with crap intake/cam/heads/pistons right?
Thats what i've heard
--------------------
87 Fox- Restoration in progress
2014 Tacoma DCLB MGM
2017 Prius Prime (The Daily)
Posts: 2655 | From: SF Bay Area | Registered: Sep 2005
| :
|
|
kingmoochr
¯
Member # 5834
|
posted
so then whats the difference between the lincoln and the ford ho motors?
Posts: 880 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
migs66/92
¯
Member # 4811
|
posted
i dont think theres much difference with a lincoln 5.0 engine and that of a 5.0 mustang engine. the difference would be on a thunderbird h.o 5.0 engine those are the ones with the shitty cam,pistons,and intake.
--------------------
Ill keep my guns and my money, you can have the change
Posts: 343 | From: lodi ,cal | Registered: Aug 2004
| :
|
|
kingmoochr
¯
Member # 5834
|
posted
thats what im getting at. the mustang used a ho engine and the lincoln used a ho engine where the cougar and t bird did not. im simply asking to be corrected if im wrong.
Posts: 880 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
migs66/92
¯
Member # 4811
|
posted
well i have seen some cougars and t-birds with the H.O but the internals are not like those of a mustang or lincoln
--------------------
Ill keep my guns and my money, you can have the change
Posts: 343 | From: lodi ,cal | Registered: Aug 2004
| :
|
|
migs66/92
¯
Member # 4811
|
posted
well i just finished swaping the engines from the lincoln to the mustang and all i had to change over was the wiring harness that goes on the injectors and the starter wires, it was super easy.only thing that sucks is i changed the clutch and put in a new pilot bearing and a throwout bearing but its now making a wierd noise when i push on the clutch could it be the throw out bearing maybe i didnt put it in right or something???
--------------------
Ill keep my guns and my money, you can have the change
Posts: 343 | From: lodi ,cal | Registered: Aug 2004
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
