|
Author
|
Topic: Big power from stock cam'ed, ported stock intake 5.0!
|
FasterDamnit
Bad Attitude
Member # 442
|
posted
 
 
I saw this on the Corral and found it very impresive!
![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif)
Stock intake engine dyno results....
A few weeks back I promised to share the dyno results of the engine I built for the 90 notch. Its a mild combo, made for a daily driver with AOD. I wanted a torquey engine with stock driving manners, better than the one I built for the 95 vert I had. Here is the combination used:
C&L with cast elbow, BBK 65mm TB
Ported stock intake (lots of work)
AFR 185's with port, valve and seat work
306 shortblock with stock crank and flat tops
Stock cam (taken out of the 95)
1 5/8 dyno headers (I will be using shorties on the car)
High-ratio crower roller rockers
24 lb injectors, stock fuel rails
Std vol oil pump and stock pan, conventional 10W 30 oil
Accel distributor and Motorsport 9mm wires( dyno MSD box)
The engine was run on Victory Engine's dyno (www.victoryengines.com), using a A9L ECM. The accessories run included the water pump and the alternator. 17* initial timing.
Here are the results, hp/tq (pulls started at 3500):
3500 266/377
4000 310/385
4500 357/392
5000 382/384
5500 399/360
6000 382/315
The results exceed my hp expectations of 350. Torque was table flat, only changed 16 ft/lbs from 3500 to 5500. I basically hit my goal of 400 fwtq.
I want to thank the guys at Victory Engines for a fantastic job, and to fellow Corraler Jeff Chambers for taking time out to help and provide his valuable insight and experience.
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=425090
--------------------
'92 LX T5
Looked stock, went 11's 11.90 at 115mph.
'65 Mustang 347
www.fordmuscle.com
Livin' in the Carolina Pines
Posts: 2971 | From: NorCal | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
94gt
¯
Member # 3060
|
posted
damn, thats nice! ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
![[burnout]](graemlins/burnout.gif)
--------------------
2020 Explorer ST
2011 Silver Raptor 'Screw
Posts: 5777 | From: Beavercreek, OH | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
Stimson
_
Member # 51
|
posted
That may hit 300 rwhp if installed in a T5 car
Posts: 2373 | Registered: Jun 2000
| :
|
|
THE King Cobra
¯
Member # 2011
|
posted
damn....that is serioulsy COOL.. wow..
--------------------
RPM Racing Team
-96 Cobra. HCI MOTORSPORTS block
-More cops in the family = more write-offs
508 RWHP @10.0lbs @6100 RPM..wait till I hit 8K RPM's
Posts: 315 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
88DroptopGT
¯
Member # 2535
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by LX Pony:
A short while back somebody on the board had an AFR 306 combo that was tested on the same Victory engine dyno, and he made 427HP, and installed in the car it made 344rwhp. So, I'm guessing you will lose about 80 HP installed, plus subtrat another 30 for the AOD, so about 290 to the wheels is my guess, which is still great for an AOD 306 with stock cam.
I wonder how heavy the Port, Valve, and seat work was done to the 185s. Obviously he got .600 springs & titanium ret. possibly. I wonder what he'll get with a better damper, short belt, etc. Are there ratios higher than 1.72 rockers? Definite Piston-notching in progress if so!
Very nice combo, I never thought those #s were obtainable w/stock intake.
Posts: 3978 | From: 707 | Registered: Mar 2003
| :
|
|
|
|
street_illegal_stang
¯
Member # 1554
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by street_illegal_stang:
just curious,but why the stock intake? ![[Confused]](confused.gif)
i can see the cam but couldn't you've gone with the gt40p intake or somthing a lil' better?
185cc? what differnts would the dyno numbers be with 165 afr?
i got the impression that 185cc head where to big
for base 5.0's
Posts: 1276 | From: Long Beach C.A | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
88gt
Custom
Member # 579
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by street_illegal_stang:
quote:
Originally posted by street_illegal_stang:
just curious,but why the stock intake?
i can see the cam but couldn't you've gone with the gt40p intake or somthing a lil' better?
185cc? what differnts would the dyno numbers be with 165 afr?
i got the impression that 185cc head where to big
for base 5.0's
The owner of the car does not post on this site. Read the article for details.
Posts: 1482 | From: Santa Clara/Bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by st5150:
That may hit 300 rwhp if installed in a T5 car
wouldn't 399 FWHP be closer to 340 RWHP in a T5? (14% drivetrain loss, rounded down)
--------------------
1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
Stimson
_
Member # 51
|
posted
I find that engine dyno's seem to read 25% high compared to dynojets. 340rwhp with a stock intake and cam just wouldn't make sense.
Posts: 2373 | Registered: Jun 2000
| :
|
|
cobraman_1994
¯
Member # 467
|
posted
thats crazy!
--------------------
86 GT
Posts: 4882 | From: eldorado hills | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
