Northern California Ford racer's Message Board Forum Sell & Buy Ford Parts in Northern California Classifieds Mustang Pictures / Videos of Ford Cars in Northern California

Northern California Ford Owners  


Post New Topic  Post a Ford message board Reply
read DMs/my profile login | join CAFords | search | faq |
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Northern California Ford Owners     » Automotive   » Tech Talk   » Remote Mount vs Engine bay

 - Email this post to someone!    
Author Topic: Remote Mount vs Engine bay
Mr.Lucky
CAFords OG
Member # 1772

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mr.Lucky  Ford pictures for Mr.Lucky    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
well for the longest time ive considered going turbo... with my daughter on the way the car has sat. I ve contemplated many motor combo's, spoken with one of the best shops represented on this board, but i had a dumb idea.

Ive seen remote mount kits ie: STS, i like the simplicity (sp) of these kits, being able to run long tubes etc. So in your guys opinions. What would be the disadvantages of running a remote mount system???

--------------------
95GT: Bolt ons.
Good sellers/buyers: Stangs R Us, 1SicGt, sn4bwc, racsirx, WickedStang, Autumnstang97, cali95gt

Posts: 4197 | From: Manteca | Registered: Sep 2002  |  :
MachYou
¯
Member # 7934

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for MachYou  Ford pictures for MachYou    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
dont do it....

--------------------
All Bullshit Stops When the Hands Drop

Posts: 726 | From: California | Registered: Oct 2007  |  :
MustangNate
¯
Member # 4559

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for MustangNate  Ford pictures for MustangNate    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
I think they are cool. You only lose like 2psi but you save on hundreds of degrees of heat in the engine bay which makes up for it.

I've been considering this for my car as well but I too have the baby thing going on, mine is here and 7 months though. [Smile]

--------------------
1989 Mustang LX Vert, 5.0 Auto

Posts: 1032 | From: Chico | Registered: May 2004  |  :
kingmoochr
¯
Member # 5834

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for kingmoochr  Ford pictures for kingmoochr    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
a LOT more piping to have to worry about. not a single car turbo car has been engineered by factory engineers with the turbo in the rear as opposed to the engine bay. do you honestly think every single engineer is overlooking something these new "easy" turbo kit producers arent?
Posts: 880 | Registered: Jul 2005  |  :
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700

Ford Icon 1 posted      Profile for turbo50  Ford pictures for turbo50    Send New Direct Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote       Share this CAFords post on FB
I think Murillo is the only one that can get away with this and have them run decent.

--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?

I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME

Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006  |  :


 
Post New Topic  Post a Ford message board Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
Hop To:

Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords



Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com