|
Author
|
Topic: Would these Wheels fit on a 92 fox????
|
|
|
The Nick
¯
Member # 2244
|
posted
 
 
9.5" wide will be tough to squeeze in the fenders. If you have/when you do a 5-lug conversion, you can't use the SN95 stuff.
--------------------
Fast, Cheap or Reliable. Pick two and live with it.
Posts: 1215 | From: The Delta | Registered: Dec 2002
| :
|
|
1992gtdrop
unregistered
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by The Nick:
9.5" wide will be tough to squeeze in the fenders. If you have/when you do a 5-lug conversion, you can't use the SN95 stuff.
Actually I would be getting 19x8.5 all around. Will SN95 fronts and 5lug fox length axles in the rear. What do you think?
:
|
|
The Nick
¯
Member # 2244
|
posted
You're going to have to work the front fenders a little. I've got 17x9s and they rub at lock.
--------------------
Fast, Cheap or Reliable. Pick two and live with it.
Posts: 1215 | From: The Delta | Registered: Dec 2002
| :
|
|
166 Merlo
FELONY
MOTORSPORTS
Member # 1549
|
posted
i think they'd tuck. Those are pretty dope too. But does the bolt pattern match up?
--------------------
'89 - Boss Coupe
'70 - Drop Cutthang
'68 - Cougnut
'87 - 0166, Its real
Posts: 3954 | From: Thebay | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
mtbaughs
Road Racer
Member # 4052
|
posted
36mm would fit the rears with an sn-95 conversion but 36mm would be wrong for the front.
--------------------
R.I.P. Charlie Bruno Dec 2001
Posts: 2019 | From: Boise, Idaho | Registered: Jan 2004
| :
|
|
1992gtdrop
unregistered
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by mtbaughs:
36mm would fit the rears with an sn-95 conversion but 36mm would be wrong for the front.
Would it tuck in to much or would it stick out
to much in the front?
:
|
|
1992gtdrop
unregistered
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 1992gtdrop:
quote:
Originally posted by mtbaughs:
36mm would fit the rears with an sn-95 conversion but 36mm would be wrong for the front.
Would it tuck in to much or would it stick out
to much in the front?
TTT?
:
|
|
jaybquick
¯
Member # 4286
|
posted
I don't know the conversion to backspacing. But get it from the guy, cuz I just put 18x9.5 rims on my 91 gt and it took 6.4" backspacing. Also you will want to ad some rack limiters in the front. And massaging of the fender lips and rear wheelwells will most likely be required.
Here is a quote from another post of mine "For the front tire rubbing buy some rack limiters from ford to limit your turning radius a little and stop the rubbing on a full lock turn. They just snap in under the passenger side steering rack boot. Just add one at a time until the rubbing goes away. The only downfall is tougher U turns, but at least you don't have to worry about tearing everything up. The ford part number is N804842-S."
Good Luck
--------------------
91 Mustang GT ET: 11.92@115
66 Mustang ET: 11.43@119
01 Audi S4 ET: 10.8@131
05 Audi S4 ET: 11.9@116
08 Audi S5 ET: 11.9@118
Posts: 416 | From: Lathrop | Registered: Mar 2004
| :
|
|
166 Merlo
FELONY
MOTORSPORTS
Member # 1549
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 1992gtdrop:
quote:
Originally posted by 1992gtdrop:
quote:
Originally posted by mtbaughs:
36mm would fit the rears with an sn-95 conversion but 36mm would be wrong for the front.
Would it tuck in to much or would it stick out
to much in the front?
TTT?
You'd run into problems with them hitting the strut.
--------------------
'89 - Boss Coupe
'70 - Drop Cutthang
'68 - Cougnut
'87 - 0166, Its real
Posts: 3954 | From: Thebay | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
