|
Author
|
Topic: RWHP numbers inside
|
1SLOWLX
¯
Member # 558
|
posted
 
 
Well on the motor it made 363 and 360 pounds of torque but the motor pulled all the way past 6700 with no problem at all. On the nitrous pass it made 480rwhp and 540rwtq :eek:with only 20 degrees total timing. It was a very very safe tune and I am happy with the results
Albert
--------------------
Built Tuff with your stuff ;)
Posts: 5231 | From: bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
DropTopFox
drama
Member # 1689
|
posted
what PSI was the nitrous at. Weird how you only got 117 rwhp on a 150 shot, I almost got that with my 100 shot ![[Confused]](confused.gif) Good numbers though Albert, that should be good enough for a 10 ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
Go out and do something for yourself today everyone, quit depending on others
-Me
http://www.CaliforniaFords.com/cgi-bin/album.pl?album=00001689
Posts: 4003 | From: San Bruno | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
mustanggt5091
All I need is.....
Member # 444
|
posted
as long as your happy thats all that matters
--------------------
88 GT 357w (SOLD):(
06 Limited Edition R6 !!!!!
Posts: 2353 | From: Fairfield / Santa Rosa , Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
GOT 50
¯
Member # 1960
|
posted
congrats albert lookin good
Posts: 2139 | From: SF/DALY CITY/MILLBRAE | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
sn8k
¯
Member # 574
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 1SLOWLX:
Well on the motor it made 363 and 360 pounds of torque but the motor pulled all the way past 6700 with no problem at all. On the nitrous pass it made 480rwhp and 540rwtq ![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
Great numbers ![[Whoo Whooooo!]](graemlins/woowoo.gif)
Pulled all the way past 6700 deserves another
Congrats
--------------------
Mark K...
| 2003 Cobra | 2001 Cobra | 89GT |
Posts: 180 | From: Livermore, CA | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
166 Merlo
FELONY
MOTORSPORTS
Member # 1549
|
posted
Closest guess: ME!
6700 rpms:
--------------------
'89 - Boss Coupe
'70 - Drop Cutthang
'68 - Cougnut
'87 - 0166, Its real
Posts: 3954 | From: Thebay | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
xchpstang
¯
Member # 1206
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by DropTopFox:
what PSI was the nitrous at. Weird how you only got 117 rwhp on a 150 shot, I almost got that with my 100 shot Good numbers though Albert, that should be good enough for a 10
That is strange since NX usually quotes their horsepower settings at the rear wheels. If that is a 150 shot that is a little low. Maybe bottle pressure was low??
--------------------
04 Cobra, K&N FIPK,
Posts: 239 | From: Turlock | Registered: Apr 2002
| :
|
|
Hungry Hippo
¯
Member # 537
|
posted
its because of the timing
--------------------
05 S4 Avant(wagon)
09 C6 H/C/I
Posts: 2959 | From: east bay | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
1SLOWLX
¯
Member # 558
|
posted
It runs great the bottle pressure was at 900-950ish. I didn't bring the NX past 6700 only the motor. The motor pulls great now ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
--------------------
Built Tuff with your stuff ;)
Posts: 5231 | From: bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
DropTopFox
drama
Member # 1689
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by HungryHippo:
its because of the timing
Nitrous actually responds better to a little less timing. Even if the timing is retarded it shouldn't make a 33 rwhp difference ![[Frown]](frown.gif)
--------------------
Go out and do something for yourself today everyone, quit depending on others
-Me
http://www.CaliforniaFords.com/cgi-bin/album.pl?album=00001689
Posts: 4003 | From: San Bruno | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
1SLOWLX
¯
Member # 558
|
posted
It was very rich also it was a real safe tune
--------------------
Built Tuff with your stuff ;)
Posts: 5231 | From: bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
Yellow94GT
Mr. 60 FT
Member # 431
|
posted
Glad to hear you are happy with your setup. Its sounds very streetable. I wouldn't worry about a missing 33 hp at this point. Assuming you are using a stock block your pushing the limits as is ![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif)
[ March 28, 2004, 09:40 PM: Message edited by: Yellow94GT ]
--------------------
AED
1994 GT Bucket that will likely never run
1999 SLOLEEN Twin Turbo Coyote
2008 F250 580 RWHP 1129 RWTQ
Posts: 5990 | From: Cameron Park, Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
DropTopFox
drama
Member # 1689
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Yellow94GT:
Glad to hear you are happy with your setup. Its sounds very streetable. I wouldn't worry about a missing 33 hp at this point. Assuming you are using a stock block your pushing the limits as is
He's on a Sportsman block. It can handle whatever he throws at it with this combo. Albert the reason it is rich is because of the way NX's jet numbers are set up. My AIr/Fuel is more rich when I'm on the bottle than when I'm off. The fuel jet is too big that they perscribe which is very safe but it could definately call for a nitrous tune to be leaned out a lot. I want to experiment with a smaller fuel jet on my kit but it's probably just not safe to do so
--------------------
Go out and do something for yourself today everyone, quit depending on others
-Me
http://www.CaliforniaFords.com/cgi-bin/album.pl?album=00001689
Posts: 4003 | From: San Bruno | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
AaronC
¯
Member # 86
|
posted
Now tweak it some more at the track. If Byron tuned it, then there's no doubt there is power left.
--------------------
1991 GT Convertible: Stock 157k mile shortblock, HiTech cam, AFR 165 heads, Edelbrock RPM intake, 1 3/4 headers
12.23 at 112.99
Best MPH 113.97
Posts: 776 | From: woodland | Registered: Dec 2000
| :
|
|
98slowhoe 'FIFTYLX'
Uncle Frank
Member # 895
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by AaronC:
Now tweak it some more at the track. If Byron tuned it, then there's no doubt there is power left.
hahah yeah no kidding, you know all about that shit!
--------------------
AKA Franky Freaking 5 liter
Advanced Engine Development
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
Engine building
916*275*8212
88 4runner on 42's
Posts: 4206 | From: Folsom | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
302n/a
¯
Member # 1465
|
posted
nice#'s
--------------------
Raiders A's Warriors Sharks
Posts: 2605 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
Jdub07
( O Y O )
Member # 2728
|
posted
Great numbers!!!! Your other 33horses are probly in the nx kit if you held it past 6700 rpms.
Hey droptopfox I thought your numbers were way lower than your sig??? Or is your sig numbers the number you got 'on the bottle'?
Posts: 7282 | Registered: Apr 2003
| :
|
|
1SLOWLX
¯
Member # 558
|
posted
I only brought the NX up to 5800 my mistake. I didn't want to chance anything happening
--------------------
Built Tuff with your stuff ;)
Posts: 5231 | From: bay area | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
Jdub07
( O Y O )
Member # 2728
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 1SLOWLX:
I only brought the NX up to 5800 my mistake. I didn't want to chance anything happening
always better safe than sorry
Posts: 7282 | Registered: Apr 2003
| :
|
|
DropTopFox
drama
Member # 1689
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Jdub07:
Great numbers!!!! Your other 33horses are probly in the nx kit if you held it past 6700 rpms.
Hey droptopfox I thought your numbers were way lower than your sig??? Or is your sig numbers the number you got 'on the bottle'?
Those are bottle numbers, motor numbers 249/251 horse and torque, that is 97 rwhp on a 100 shot. You should've held it up Albert. Your motor can handle it, you can't be afraid to let it do so
--------------------
Go out and do something for yourself today everyone, quit depending on others
-Me
http://www.CaliforniaFords.com/cgi-bin/album.pl?album=00001689
Posts: 4003 | From: San Bruno | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
