|
Author
|
Topic: RE: 17 x 9 RIMS
|
Beasty5.0
¯
Member # 2935
|
posted
 
 
Does anyone know whether I will be able to fit 17 x 9 with +26mm, 6.11' backspace with 255-45 under a 91 convertible GT? If I can't, then what do I need to make it work. Thanks in advance.
--------------------
1992 Geo Metro, Running 32's in the quarter-mile
Posts: 1055 | From: San Francisco | Registered: Jun 2003
| :
|
|
Gear Head
JARED
Member # 779
|
posted
Is that 255/45/17 all around? If so you will rub bad in the front and the rear. I would suggest a 235 or 245 for the fronts and get 275's in the rear. Roll your rear fenders and you wont have any rubbing issues.
--------------------
Support our troops!
Posts: 5685 | From: EASTBAY | Registered: Jan 2002
| :
|
|
Beasty5.0
¯
Member # 2935
|
posted
Is rolling the rear fenders a difficult task? How much would it cost to have it done? Just to make it more clear for myself, I be fine with going 235/45/17 in front and 275/40/17 in back? By the way thanks for taking the time to reply. ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
Posts: 1055 | From: San Francisco | Registered: Jun 2003
| :
|
|
Blu50Stang
CAFords OG
Member # 489
|
posted
You will be fine with 235s up front. Depending on the backspacing and whether or not you have quad shocks, you might be able to get those 275s in the rear without rolling the fender lips. If you need to do so, be careful or you can damage(crack) the paint on the bottom edge of the fender.
--------------------
Ross
'88 GT - 5.0&SF 4/04 | MM&FF 8/09 | MM&FF 79-93 Mustang Performance Cover 12/12
'17 GT350R
Posts: 1916 | From: Not CA | Registered: Oct 2001
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
