|
Author
|
Topic: New combo - Give me your guestimate on what to expect
|
stanger91
¯
Member # 397
|
posted
 
 
Just got done colletcing all my parts for the top end, and about to assemble in a week or so. What does everyone think ill be putting to the ground? My goal is 500rwhp, if i dont produce enough PSI with the pulley i might have to get a powerpipe or get a smaller pulley. here is the link to my mods, tell me what to expect so i can get all excited ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
MODS
--------------------
E.T 12.314@126.300
Posts: 778 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
Um....yeah....I think you'll EASILY hit your goal.
--------------------
www.advancedenginedevelopment.com
SCT dealer
Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4265 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
Glenn
¯
Member # 520
|
posted
you should be close to it I think.
--------------------
S-Trim,331,H/C/I
"JohnB groupie train"
My Car
DragGuam
Posts: 2009 | From: Stationed on a Pacific Island, Guam | Registered: Oct 2001
| :
|
|
Stimson
_
Member # 51
|
posted
Basicly, you can never go wrong with TEA ported TW's, an Anderson B4 cam and some gear driven centrifical boost 500 rwhp? I can't count the number of 10 second cars with the combo you listed above. AFM cam + TW heads + blower is one of the most common 10 second 5.O combos around.
I see you have 300+ cfm flowing in on the heads, but an edelbrok performer RPM upper than flows 235ish cfm? That's a mismatch right there.
Posts: 2373 | Registered: Jun 2000
| :
|
|
stanger91
¯
Member # 397
|
posted
i knew the upper intake would be the bottleneck, but the budget was hit and i really dont want to go over what i planned to spend, ya know.
[ February 21, 2003, 04:36 PM: Message edited by: stanger91 ]
--------------------
E.T 12.314@126.300
Posts: 778 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
|
|
Glenn
¯
Member # 520
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by stanger91:
i knew the upper intake would be the bottleneck, but the budget was hit and i really dont want to go over what i planned to spend, ya know.
wanna sell that rpm upper?
--------------------
S-Trim,331,H/C/I
"JohnB groupie train"
My Car
DragGuam
Posts: 2009 | From: Stationed on a Pacific Island, Guam | Registered: Oct 2001
| :
|
|
stanger91
¯
Member # 397
|
posted
negative, i bent over for summit and paid the $499 brand new price for it.
--------------------
E.T 12.314@126.300
Posts: 778 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
DropTopFox
drama
Member # 1689
|
posted
I thought the Holley intake would have been a better fit for this, correct me if I'm wrong but I thought that was the best intake around especially for blowers. ![[Frown]](frown.gif)
--------------------
Go out and do something for yourself today everyone, quit depending on others
-Me
http://www.CaliforniaFords.com/cgi-bin/album.pl?album=00001689
Posts: 4003 | From: San Bruno | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
166 Merlo
FELONY
MOTORSPORTS
Member # 1549
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by PseudoCobra:
I thought the Holley intake would have been a better fit for this, correct me if I'm wrong but I thought that was the best intake around especially for blowers.
According to FTI it is.
Dude your shit's slow, give it up. ![[burnout]](graemlins/burnout.gif)
What was the budget by the way?
[ February 23, 2003, 11:42 PM: Message edited by: 87 Saleen ]
--------------------
'89 - Boss Coupe
'70 - Drop Cutthang
'68 - Cougnut
'87 - 0166, Its real
Posts: 3954 | From: Thebay | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
Stimson
_
Member # 51
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by PseudoCobra:
I thought the Holley intake would have been a better fit for this, correct me if I'm wrong but I thought that was the best intake around especially for blowers.
You're right. Either a Holley or maybe even a TFS-R intake cleaned up... but either way, he's looking risking a cracked block if the car makes the power it is suppose to ![[Eek!]](eek.gif) Lets hope the fuel system is top notch like the top half of the motor ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
Posts: 2373 | Registered: Jun 2000
| :
|
|
stanger91
¯
Member # 397
|
posted
Negative on the cracked block. Its a Mexican block, can take about 600rwhp. Im only giving it 500, ill be more then safe.
--------------------
E.T 12.314@126.300
Posts: 778 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
Stimson
_
Member # 51
|
posted
I honestly think Mexican blocks are over rated and hype. I'm not alone on this thought. I have seen no conclusive proof that they support more HP. I've seen regular 5.O blocks make just as much power as mexican blocks, if not more. To me mexican block vs stock 5.O roller block is effectively a coke vs pepsi debate. Just my two cents, take it for what its worth.
Posts: 2373 | Registered: Jun 2000
| :
|
|
stanger91
¯
Member # 397
|
posted
by looking at my mexican block i could see where the caps are thicker, slightly thicker pan rail and webs between cylinders. Look slike i have a Coke can, cause Coke is better
As you can see:
 
[ February 24, 2003, 09:51 PM: Message edited by: stanger91 ]
--------------------
E.T 12.314@126.300
Posts: 778 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
Yellow94GT
Mr. 60 FT
Member # 431
|
posted
No offence Jim, but I prefur Pepsi ![[Whoo Whooooo!]](graemlins/woowoo.gif)
--------------------
AED
1994 GT Bucket that will likely never run
1999 SLOLEEN Twin Turbo Coyote
2008 F250 580 RWHP 1129 RWTQ
Posts: 5990 | From: Cameron Park, Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
stanger91
¯
Member # 397
|
posted
lol
--------------------
E.T 12.314@126.300
Posts: 778 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
stanger91
¯
Member # 397
|
posted
lol
--------------------
E.T 12.314@126.300
Posts: 778 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
Jeff S
¯
Member # 371
|
posted
I'd expect your "tuner" to say..."looks like you need a better fuel system buddy"
Actually it will probably do fine on the dyno so i'm gonna predict 2 melted pistons at the 1100' mark first trip to the track. ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
As others have stated i'd suggest trying to trade the RPM and a little cash for a Holley but either way 550+ should be a problem with the 3.25" Novi pulley. You're gonna need better than 91 octane though.
[ February 24, 2003, 11:48 PM: Message edited by: Jeff S ]
--------------------
'90 Mustang LX: 8.53 @ 157.92 w/ 1.33 60' on DR's
'10 ZR1: FOR SALE
'14 E63 S: RENNtech ECU
'04 Gallardo: UGR TTG
Posts: 2121 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
166 Merlo
FELONY
MOTORSPORTS
Member # 1549
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Yellow94GT:
No offence Jim, but I prefur Pepsi
I think you have a Pepsi can also, cuz everyone knows Pepsi is the best.
--------------------
'89 - Boss Coupe
'70 - Drop Cutthang
'68 - Cougnut
'87 - 0166, Its real
Posts: 3954 | From: Thebay | Registered: Jul 2002
| :
|
|
SlowFiveOh94
¯
Member # 2404
|
posted
Are you saying you like the drink better? or the regular 5.0 block better? I'm talking out of my ass because I dont know much about engines... ![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif) Jim's Cobra
Time to get out of Tech Talk and back to General Talk where I belong...
[ February 25, 2003, 01:06 AM: Message edited by: SlowFiveOh94 ]
--------------------
2001 Mustang GT (Faleen Speedster)
Posts: 1184 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Feb 2003
| :
|
|
stanger91
¯
Member # 397
|
posted
awww Jeff, be nice about Byron
--------------------
E.T 12.314@126.300
Posts: 778 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
Yellow94GT
Mr. 60 FT
Member # 431
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by stanger91:
awww Jeff, be nice about Byron
He isn't saying anything bad about Byron, he is calling you dumb for not having a better fuel system ![[Wink]](wink.gif)
--------------------
AED
1994 GT Bucket that will likely never run
1999 SLOLEEN Twin Turbo Coyote
2008 F250 580 RWHP 1129 RWTQ
Posts: 5990 | From: Cameron Park, Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
stanger91
¯
Member # 397
|
posted
Well if you talked to him on AIM, then you would know he doesnt like Byrons Tunes. What he IS SAYING IS, Byrons Tuning doenst consist of taking the car off the Dyno. The Dyno only accounts for so much weight, my car is heavier, so my A/F ratio will be OK on the dyno. But on the street, it wont be...becaose of Byrons Tune.
[ February 25, 2003, 02:17 PM: Message edited by: stanger91 ]
--------------------
E.T 12.314@126.300
Posts: 778 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
stanger91
¯
Member # 397
|
posted
But ill give you ALITTLE credit, JUST ALITTLE. I am maxing out my fuel system.
--------------------
E.T 12.314@126.300
Posts: 778 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
67stang12s
¯
Member # 2314
|
posted
i think u should really think about the block you want 500RWHP so you are kicking out a lil more than 600 at motor jus something to think about
--------------------
The Heartbeat stops here
F O R D
Posts: 220 | From: 415 | Registered: Jan 2003
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
