T O P I C R E V I E W
|
Team SOLO
Member # 722
|
posted
Alright….so my brothers and I have put together a car. Bear in mind this will have a Jeff S supplied chip and will also have a 150hp shot of nitrous (NOS dry system) wired right to the transbrake and car should have a race weight of 2900 with me in it.
Guess the following:
ET on motor: MPH on motor: ET with nitrous; MPH with nitrous: Sixty foot on motor: Sixty foot with nitrous: Dyno numbers on motor:
Here are the facts on the car:
1988 Mustang
Engine: -stock bottom end 302 w/ 8x,xxx miles -AFR 165 heads, mildly ported -1.6 adjustable roller rockers -Lunati Cam - Duration 292/292, Lift .512/.512 -Edelbrock Performer RPM intake -1" phenolic spacer -70mm throttlebody -76mm mass air meter -BBK cold air intake -underdrive pullies -FMS 9MM wires -MSD distributor -MSD 6AL
Exhaust: -1 ¾” long tube headers -3” h-pipe -3” bullet mufflers
Transmission/Rearend: -Artcarr C4 transmission – reverse manual -10” 4,000 stall converter -trans brake -B&M Pro Ratchet shifter -line lock -Aluminum driveshaft -8.8 Auburn posi w/ 4.10 gears -31 spline axles
Fuel -255lph intank fuel pump -NOS inline fuel pump (supplied w/ dry nitrous kit) -94-95 fuel rails -Aeromotive adjustable fuel pressure regulator -30# injectors
Cooling system: -Aluminum radiator -Edelbrock water pump -160 degree thermostat -dual electric fans
Chassis/Suspension: -10 point cromoly roll cage -through floor boxed subframe connectors -welded torque boxes -D&D Tubular k-member and a-arms -Lakewood 90/10 struts -Coil over kit w/ 14” 140# QA1 springs -Flaming river manual rack with bump steer -Lakewood 50/50 shocks -Granatelli upper/lower control arms -MM caster/camber plates
Rims/Tires: -Weld Draglite 15x8 w/ 5.5bs -Weld Draglite 15x3 front runners -MT 28x10.5 ET Drag slicks -Goodyear Eagle 27x4.5 front runner tires
Other -Saleen wing -Battery relocated to back of car -2 aluminum drag buckets [ August 07, 2007, 06:41 PM: Message edited by: Team SOLO ]
|
forced331
Member # 1270
|
posted
ET on motor: 11.54 MPH on motor:114.34 ET with nitrous;10.13 MPH with nitrous:131.3 Sixty foot on motor:1.49 Sixty foot with nitrous:1.36 Dyno numbers on motor:318.9875 [ August 07, 2007, 06:32 PM: Message edited by: forced331 ]
|
hidnn.o.s.
Member # 1219
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by forced331: ET on motor: 11.54 MPH on motor:114.34
|
Team SOLO
Member # 722
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.: quote: Originally posted by forced331: ET on motor: 11.54 MPH on motor:114.34
Whoa...Are you licensed to use that smiley? I thought you were restricted to rolleyes only? Hmmmm
|
SmokinLX
Member # 1684
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Team SOLO: Alright….so my brothers and I have put together a car. Bear in mind this will have a Jeff S supplied chip and will also have a 150hp shot of nitrous (NOS dry system) wired right to the transbrake and car should have a race weight of 2900 with me in it.
Guess the following:
ET on motor: MPH on motor: ET with nitrous; MPH with nitrous: Sixty foot on motor: Sixty foot with nitrous: Dyno numbers on motor:
Here are the facts on the car:
ET motor 11.7 - MPH 113 - ET nitrous 10.6 - 60 ft motor 1.55 - 60 ft nitrous 1.45 - dyno #'s ? lockup or non lockup converter? 320 rwhp. All just guesses with no timeslip's in front of Me to go off of.
|
hidnn.o.s.
Member # 1219
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Team SOLO: quote: Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.: quote: Originally posted by forced331: ET on motor: 11.54 MPH on motor:114.34
Whoa...Are you licensed to use that smiley? I thought you were restricted to rolleyes only? Hmmmm
Hahaha, first SF89 yesterday calling me on the rolleyes, now you, THAT SMILEY SHOULD BE RE-TITLED "DON"
Edit: If I ever do get out to one of the car shows I'm going to wear a shirt with a huge rolleyes so everyone knows it's me [ August 07, 2007, 07:13 PM: Message edited by: hidnn.o.s. ]
|
Team SOLO
Member # 722
|
posted
I'm gonna save my guesses until I get a few more other people jumping in on this thread. However, if anyone remember's my old maroon mustang with the gray cowl hood, this combo is nearly the same. 3 distinct differences:
This car: AFR heads That car: World Product Windsor Jrs.
This car: cromoly cage That car: mild steel cage
This car: tubular k-member/a-arms, coil over That car: stock k-member/a-arms, eibach launch kit
That car went.........?????
|
turbo50
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Team SOLO: I'm gonna save my guesses until I get a few more other people jumping in on this thread. However, if anyone remember's my old maroon mustang with the gray cowl hood, this combo is nearly the same. 3 distinct differences:
This car: AFR heads That car: World Product Windsor Jrs.
This car: cromoly cage That car: mild steel cage
This car: tubular k-member/a-arms, coil over That car: stock k-member/a-arms, eibach launch kit
That car went.........?????
Not sure how fast it did or didnt go, but didnt that car make a tad over 300rwhp on motor alone?
|
2stangs69-91
Member # 1951
|
posted
I don't really care but at least you are running a Ford in it. It should be a 10 sec car on the squeeze. but it won't hit 130
|
Team SOLO
Member # 722
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by turbo50: quote: Originally posted by Team SOLO: I'm gonna save my guesses until I get a few more other people jumping in on this thread. However, if anyone remember's my old maroon mustang with the gray cowl hood, this combo is nearly the same. 3 distinct differences:
This car: AFR heads That car: World Product Windsor Jrs.
This car: cromoly cage That car: mild steel cage
This car: tubular k-member/a-arms, coil over That car: stock k-member/a-arms, eibach launch kit
That car went.........?????
Not sure how fast it did or didnt go, but didnt that car make a tad over 300rwhp on motor alone?
Car hit 298.7rwhp - ran a 12.0 on the motor and I have between 40 and 50 timeslips of that thing running between 10.85 and 10.94 on the jug. How time flies...what was that....9 years ago?
|
Team SOLO
Member # 722
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 2stangs69-91: I don't really care but at least you are running a Ford in it. It should be a 10 sec car on the squeeze. but it won't hit 130
The one with the Chevy goes faster
|
2stangs69-91
Member # 1951
|
posted
it used to go faster with a Ford [ August 08, 2007, 04:19 PM: Message edited by: 2stangs69-91 ]
|
Team SOLO
Member # 722
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 2stangs69-91: it used to go faster with a Ford
But it will be 'quicker' with the Chevy...I care about ET not MPH
|
2stangs69-91
Member # 1951
|
posted
I totaly agree on the ET not MPH thing. Get there first. Will "meaning not yet"...just think how fast that little ford would have been with all the upgrades you did to the car...WOW LOL
|
Team SOLO
Member # 722
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 2stangs69-91: I totaly agree on the ET not MPH thing. Get there first. Will "meaning not yet"...just think how fast that little ford would have been with all the upgrades you did to the car...WOW LOL
It would have already been on its lid
However, I still have the thoughts of doing the naturally aspirated big block chevy in this thing. Imagine 1300 hp naturally aspirated in a car that weighs 2670 currently (w/ the small block).
|
turbo50
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Team SOLO: quote: Originally posted by turbo50: quote: Originally posted by Team SOLO: I'm gonna save my guesses until I get a few more other people jumping in on this thread. However, if anyone remember's my old maroon mustang with the gray cowl hood, this combo is nearly the same. 3 distinct differences:
This car: AFR heads That car: World Product Windsor Jrs.
This car: cromoly cage That car: mild steel cage
This car: tubular k-member/a-arms, coil over That car: stock k-member/a-arms, eibach launch kit
That car went.........?????
Not sure how fast it did or didnt go, but didnt that car make a tad over 300rwhp on motor alone?
Car hit 298.7rwhp - ran a 12.0 on the motor and I have between 40 and 50 timeslips of that thing running between 10.85 and 10.94 on the jug. How time flies...what was that....9 years ago?
Not sure exactly how long ago it was but I knew of the car 6-8 years ago, so ya.
With that being said I dont see why this one WONT go faster on and off the bottle.
If it DONT then looks like you will have alot of explaining to do to yourself?
lol. [ August 09, 2007, 03:52 PM: Message edited by: turbo50 ]
|
Team SOLO
Member # 722
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by turbo50: If it DONT then looks like you will have alot of explaining to do to yourself?
lol.
I don't talk to myself
|