T O P I C R E V I E W
|
1FAST93NOTCH
Member # 10722
|
posted
If I had the money, I would purchase this.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/ctd/4871084366.html
|
SLOWBACK 67
Member # 6348
|
posted
Not my cup of tea. I'd have to look at it in person to even suggest that the car is worth the asking price. It also says 6 in the description on the right.
|
1FAST93NOTCH
Member # 10722
|
posted
scratch what I said.
6 blows ass [ 2015-02-01, 02:45 PM: Message edited by: 1FAST93NOTCH ]
|
SLOWBACK 67
Member # 6348
|
posted
It does say rebuilt 302. They put 302 tags on it. That kinda bothers me a little.
|
eldog68
Member # 12928
|
posted
That's in fastback money range. Too much for a coupe. And kinda skecty that you don't show a picture of the motor on a completely restored car. Especially if it has a 302.
|
Autumnstang97
Member # 6111
|
posted
IMO- a little high. No engine pics??
|
hurting your feelings
Member # 13641
|
posted
Was 302 even available in 1966 for a mustang?
|
92_5.0
Member # 7624
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by hurting your feelings: Was 302 even available in 1966 for a mustang?
My thought exactly
|
92_5.0
Member # 7624
|
posted
says "completely restored" but has aftermarket stereo.
|
SLOWBACK 67
Member # 6348
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by hurting your feelings: Was 302 even available in 1966 for a mustang?
Nope. Not till late 67 were they putting them in the Mustang. You could get a the solid grind cam 289 as the performance motor in 66. [ 2015-02-02, 12:56 PM: Message edited by: SLOWBACK 67 ]
|
Z06-FTMFW
Member # 3164
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Autumnstang97: IMO- a little high. No engine pics??
my was thinking the same thing??
|