|
Author
|
Topic: Eleanor this.....
|
|
|
losbadgts
¯
Member # 4394
|
posted
 
 
For some reason I dont like vids that show so many seens at once, so fucking annoying. Two the car looks clean but looks like a camaro in the front and also the tail lights. Wack
--------------------
Why pretent someone u are not, everyone else could see it.
Posts: 3625 | From: redwood city | Registered: Apr 2004
| :
|
|
SwEeT03Gt
¯
Member # 10283
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by losbadgts:
For some reason I dont like vids that show so many seens at once, so fucking annoying. Two the car looks clean but looks like a camaro in the front and also the tail lights. Wack
and it has a unicorn lol
Posts: 4484 | From: -NicKlE n DiMe- | Registered: Sep 2010
| :
|
|
CAStang
¯
Member # 9568
|
posted
$250-300k
"Featuring many of the styling elements of iconic cars from the sixties, the 2014 Equus Bass 770 is a completely new take on classic American muscle packed with a lot of today’s automobile technology. The car’s most noticeable design influence is clearly the sloping lines of the Fastback Mustang, but there are some hints of past Camaros and Challengers as well.
But make no mistake about, with a starting price of $250,000, the Bass 770 is far from your typical old school ride.
The car, built by the Detroit-based Equss Automotive, is powered by a handcrafted 6.2-liter aluminum supercharged 640 horsepower V8 engine with 605 lb-ft. of torque matted to a six-speed rear mounted dual-clutch transmission, which is good for 0-60 mph in 3.4 seconds and a top speed of 200 mph – according to the company’s official website. Other performance features include Brembo carbon ceramic brakes, a magnetic suspension system, and a performance traction management system."
Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/photogalleries/new-2014-equus-bass-770-should-win-over-even-the-least-likely-of-muscle-car-fans/#ixzz2fPL30AUR
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook
[ 2013-09-19, 10:28 PM: Message edited by: CAStang ]
Posts: 351 | From: Santa Clara | Registered: Nov 2009
| :
|
|
BLK66FB
¯
Member # 8282
|
posted
Personally for that kind of money I would rather buy an actual 66-67 mustang fastback frame and dump 100k into it. Still be badass with better looking lines.
--------------------
----------------------
1966 Mustang Fastback
2016 Mustang GT
Posts: 115 | From: San Jose | Registered: Mar 2008
| :
|
|
CAStang
¯
Member # 9568
|
posted
I agree, it can be built better for less, but still looks like a fun drive. I wouldn't mind having one in my garage, but not for the price mentioned.
Posts: 351 | From: Santa Clara | Registered: Nov 2009
| :
|
|
i
¯
Member # 12534
|
posted
i fall asllepp
--------------------
86 Caged Coupe 5.0
91 Salvaged Coupe
Posts: 1901 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Nov 2012
| :
|
|
68dustin
CAFords OG
Member # 5388
|
posted
HOLY SHIT.. 250K..
--------------------
"As I lay rubber down the street, I pray for traction that I can keep, and if I do begin to slide, please dear God protect me and my ride!"
Posts: 3991 | From: neverland | Registered: Feb 2005
| :
|
|
SLOWBACK 67
¯
Member # 6348
|
posted
Did they really put a Chevy motor in it?
--------------------
Originally posted by turbo50:
I have no intenions of keeping anyones parts or taking anyones money.
Posts: 8582 | From: Vallejo | Registered: Dec 2005
| :
|
|
Black 02 SS
¯
Member # 5939
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by SLOWBACK 67:
Did they really put a Chevy motor in it?
I think I do spy an LS3 under the hood, possibly even the dry sump system.
I LOVE the integration of all the modern features (GPS, TPMS, heated seats, etc) into a classic muscle styled car. So SICK.
--------------------
Schwinn 18speed
Posts: 949 | From: East Bay | Registered: Aug 2005
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
