This is topic Los Angeles finest at it again. *nsfw* in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=059063

Posted by Infamous5.0 (Member # 1745) on :
 
Long Beach cops beat this poor man. Some folks aka cop lovers will justify the beating while others don't. You be the judge

http://youtu.be/YxxdYUXqjLY
 
Posted by mikeP (Member # 4489) on :
 
holy crap..not sure what this guy did but he sure looks like he cant turn on his stomach especially getting hit in the tibia like that..gotta be broke..sad to see regardless
 
Posted by Duncan Motors (Member # 7045) on :
 
oh thats a gang war, them against citizens, havent u seen if u dont jus suck there dick on the spot they do that? they do it to kids here! i got countless stories of that crap here, many reports jus dropped after citizens have been beaten in the hospital for days, not one time has any justice here been recorded for a cops bad actions.
 
Posted by Secnd2nun64 (Member # 1431) on :
 
That guy was still resisting after being on the ground. That video shows one side of things and who knows what the suspect did or what the police tried to do to stop him before resorting to hitting him. For all we know that guy may have been on drugs and had a syringe in his hands that he wouldn't let go. I don't think it was a random beating without cause. The beating did look excessive though. I'm sure it will be investigated.
 
Posted by fredfifty (Member # 10320) on :
 
roll over
 
Posted by Infamous5.0 (Member # 1745) on :
 
They said that guy was fighting with another guy on the street and the cops were trying to arrest him. If three cops can't subdue one person on the ground than they shouldn't be cops, unless he was holding something in his hands or was on some superman drug but the guy didn't appear to be on anything.
 
Posted by rgtrahn (Member # 7133) on :
 
The audio is more powerful than the video. The officers can clearly be heard repeatidly saying, "Get on your stomach!" Even the people recording can be heard saying, "Roll over." A subject lying on his back with his head up and foot out ready to strike is far from complying and can easily be articulated as a threat to those officers.

A kick from that subject to the front of a knee cap can easily cause a career ending injury, a kick to the hand while trying to grab that extended leg can easily break a hand. A kick to the face/ head can easily cause serious injury.

Sure, its easy to Monday morning quarterback the force used. Some might suggest the officers on-scene could have piled on the black fog, but the same critics that are arguing excessive force in this scenario would be same critics arguing that the fog is excessive force. It's like asking why an officer involved in a shooting does not try and shoot a arm or leg. These officers are not aiming for their strikes at the face or torso of the subject. The officers are clearly attempting to strike the legs and arms of the subject. If in the process, the subject attempts to block or avoid a strike and is hit in the torso, head, ect, it's his own fault and it happens.

Furthermore, all that we have to go on is a small grainey video and the audio. Do you know if the subject was under the influence of drugs or alcohol? Do you know the training or experience of the subject? Do you know the subject did not have any weapons? Do you know the training or experience of the officers?

Really, it's a rather simply use of force. Had the subject complied, he could have avoided the entire use of force incident.
 
Posted by 87MclarenMustang (Member # 10695) on :
 
I do know that midway through the video he had been tazered and didnt need to be continually struck with a baton at the time!
 
Posted by rgtrahn (Member # 7133) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 87MclarenMustang:
I do know that midway through the video he had been tazered and didnt need to be continually struck with a baton at the time!

I would ask first, do you know if the probes from the taser connected? Do you know if it was one probe or both probes? Do you know where the probes made contacf with the subject? That all makes a difference.

Second, in watching the video and listening to the audio, did the use of the taser overcome the resistance of the subject or did he continue to resist and even question why he needed to comply?

I would suggest that not only was the subject resisting those officers, he was actively physically fighting.
 
Posted by platinumplus (Member # 2249) on :
 
LESS LETHAL FORCE WORKS! HIGHLY RECOMMENDED
 
Posted by 04 S281 (Member # 9229) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rgtrahn:
The audio is more powerful than the video. The officers can clearly be heard repeatidly saying, "Get on your stomach!" Even the people recording can be heard saying, "Roll over." A subject lying on his back with his head up and foot out ready to strike is far from complying and can easily be articulated as a threat to those officers.

A kick from that subject to the front of a knee cap can easily cause a career ending injury, a kick to the hand while trying to grab that extended leg can easily break a hand. A kick to the face/ head can easily cause serious injury.

Sure, its easy to Monday morning quarterback the force used. Some might suggest the officers on-scene could have piled on the black fog, but the same critics that are arguing excessive force in this scenario would be same critics arguing that the fog is excessive force. It's like asking why an officer involved in a shooting does not try and shoot a arm or leg. These officers are not aiming for their strikes at the face or torso of the subject. The officers are clearly attempting to strike the legs and arms of the subject. If in the process, the subject attempts to block or avoid a strike and is hit in the torso, head, ect, it's his own fault and it happens.

Furthermore, all that we have to go on is a small grainey video and the audio. Do you know if the subject was under the influence of drugs or alcohol? Do you know the training or experience of the subject? Do you know the subject did not have any weapons? Do you know the training or experience of the officers?

Really, it's a rather simply use of force. Had the subject complied, he could have avoided the entire use of force incident.

This
 
Posted by NEIGHT (Member # 8741) on :
 
Then cops wonder why people blast them.
 
Posted by SLOWBACK 67 (Member # 6348) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by NEIGHT:
Then cops wonder why people blast them.

Then people like yourself wonder why cops are on such high alert/. Over react over the smallest amount of non cooperative commands. [Wink]
This is the big vicious cycle of cops vs citizens. I've seen, heard & have been on both sides of this problem. My brother was sued once by a drug dealer who acused him of throwing him over a fense, causing him to become paralyzed. ( This was after he sold crack to an undercover officer.)

What really happened is he was halfway over the fense, with one leg kicked my brother in the head and fell over the fense causing the injury.

Good old John Burrass was his lawyer in court. [BS flag]
 
Posted by crazyhorse (Member # 5662) on :
 
This video is one sided, stupid media only shows this but never showed when the guy threw a punch at a cop.
 
Posted by i (Member # 12534) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by NEIGHT:
Then cops wonder why people blast them.

+1 Should of roll over tho...
 
Posted by FiveOhChuck (Member # 12588) on :
 
Maybe they should have tazed him from the beginning?? But I guess cops beating the hell out of someone is okay. [Confused]
 
Posted by red5o (Member # 12651) on :
 
So all those trained police officers can't get him to roll over instead just beat the shit out of him is better
 
Posted by turbo50 (Member # 6700) on :
 
Meanwhile in the real world cops have been required to wear cameras and what do you know.....60% drop in citizen complaints and 40% drop in excessive force.

Cops are just criminals behind badges but like criminals you have soft and you have hard ones.

I remember my 2002 pleasant hill PD beating very well. One on one they were paranoid.
 
Posted by rgtrahn (Member # 7133) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by turbo50:
Meanwhile in the real world cops have been required to wear cameras and what do you know.....60% drop in citizen complaints and 40% drop in excessive force.

Cops are just criminals behind badges but like criminals you have soft and you have hard ones.

I remember my 2002 pleasant hill PD beating very well. One on one they were paranoid.

I'm not sure where your numbers come from, but I have never heard of those type of figures. Truth is, when you're out enfrocing laws, not everyone is going to be happy. Espically, the ones going to jail or receiving tickets.

Many agencies do wear cameras on their person or mounted in their patrol vehicles. Although I do not wear a camera or have a camera in my vehicle, I am an advocate for them. I have nothing to hide and when a baseless complaint arrives on my supervisors desk because someone is mad I was doing my job by ticketing or arresting them there is audio / video to substantiate what I wrote in my notes or report.

You call it paranoid, I call it being safe. I'm not on patrol in the streets to get into a bar fight to see who has the bigger... I know what my limitations are and I know I'm not a superhero. Many times, the people I contact are under the influence of alcohol / drugs, have mental health issues, have more training in "MMA" and ultimately, they do not want to go to jail. It would be unfair to my family if I was careless and unsafe out there.

For examole, a lot of times both in my experience and in studies, the moment an officer goes hands on to conduct a search for weapons or ect. The fight is on. In every contact there is a gun. If an officer is alone without a cover unit and is knocked out or injured a suspect could easily take an officers taser, baton / asp or firearm.

After loosing my academy mate and friend earlier this year to a gunshot wound to the head, I am more vigilant now than ever.

I would challenge those of you who have had a bad experience with law enforcement, real or fictitious to go on a ride along with your local agencies. At the sametime, as you read threads such as this you have to discredit comments from people like Neight who representing themselves to be a northerner / gangmember.
 
Posted by Smoked50 (Member # 9592) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by turbo50:


Cops are just criminals behind badges but like criminals you have soft and you have hard ones.


This.
 
Posted by turbo50 (Member # 6700) on :
 
You can google it rg and dont take it as a personal attack since your a cop.


I got my statistics that I could be mistaken on, from CBS news talk radio which is all I listen to as I commute to work.

It was Oakland or san Fran mayor wanting to enforce this due to the great results I believe from long beach lol
 
Posted by MauriSSio (Member # 9943) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rgtrahn:
The audio is more powerful than the video. The officers can clearly be heard repeatidly saying, "Get on your stomach!" Even the people recording can be heard saying, "Roll over." A subject lying on his back with his head up and foot out ready to strike is far from complying and can easily be articulated as a threat to those officers.

A kick from that subject to the front of a knee cap can easily cause a career ending injury, a kick to the hand while trying to grab that extended leg can easily break a hand. A kick to the face/ head can easily cause serious injury.

Sure, its easy to Monday morning quarterback the force used. Some might suggest the officers on-scene could have piled on the black fog, but the same critics that are arguing excessive force in this scenario would be same critics arguing that the fog is excessive force. It's like asking why an officer involved in a shooting does not try and shoot a arm or leg. These officers are not aiming for their strikes at the face or torso of the subject. The officers are clearly attempting to strike the legs and arms of the subject. If in the process, the subject attempts to block or avoid a strike and is hit in the torso, head, ect, it's his own fault and it happens.

Furthermore, all that we have to go on is a small grainey video and the audio. Do you know if the subject was under the influence of drugs or alcohol? Do you know the training or experience of the subject? Do you know the subject did not have any weapons? Do you know the training or experience of the officers?

Really, it's a rather simply use of force. Had the subject complied, he could have avoided the entire use of force incident.

excellent post!! and i agree that the complainers should go on some ride alongs
 
Posted by losbadgts (Member # 4394) on :
 
People are people so we all have different attitudes cop or not. Now there are the law if u want to be stupid and argue with them and not comply then get your beat then. if u comply and do everything they say and still beat u then thats just abuse.
 
Posted by Blue92 (Member # 8789) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by NEIGHT:
Then cops wonder why people blast them.

You have said some stupid shit in the past but this one tops it. SMH
 
Posted by 66_5.0 (Member # 9974) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by rgtrahn:
quote:
Originally posted by turbo50:
Meanwhile in the real world cops have been required to wear cameras and what do you know.....60% drop in citizen complaints and 40% drop in excessive force.

Cops are just criminals behind badges but like criminals you have soft and you have hard ones.

I remember my 2002 pleasant hill PD beating very well. One on one they were paranoid.

I'm not sure where your numbers come from, but I have never heard of those type of figures. Truth is, when you're out enfrocing laws, not everyone is going to be happy. Espically, the ones going to jail or receiving tickets.

Many agencies do wear cameras on their person or mounted in their patrol vehicles. Although I do not wear a camera or have a camera in my vehicle, I am an advocate for them. I have nothing to hide and when a baseless complaint arrives on my supervisors desk because someone is mad I was doing my job by ticketing or arresting them there is audio / video to substantiate what I wrote in my notes or report.

You call it paranoid, I call it being safe. I'm not on patrol in the streets to get into a bar fight to see who has the bigger... I know what my limitations are and I know I'm not a superhero. Many times, the people I contact are under the influence of alcohol / drugs, have mental health issues, have more training in "MMA" and ultimately, they do not want to go to jail. It would be unfair to my family if I was careless and unsafe out there.

For examole, a lot of times both in my experience and in studies, the moment an officer goes hands on to conduct a search for weapons or ect. The fight is on. In every contact there is a gun. If an officer is alone without a cover unit and is knocked out or injured a suspect could easily take an officers taser, baton / asp or firearm.

After loosing my academy mate and friend earlier this year to a gunshot wound to the head, I am more vigilant now than ever.

I would challenge those of you who have had a bad experience with law enforcement, real or fictitious to go on a ride along with your local agencies. At the sametime, as you read threads such as this you have to discredit comments from people like Neight who representing themselves to be a northerner / gangmember.

Agree 100%.
 
Posted by CobramanPhil (Member # 2170) on :
 
I am not sure what is going on there, but there is a beating going on. I thought SOP was to get the combative person on the ground and cuffed? In this video I don't see that happening. There were enough officers there to get him subdued...arm lock..knee on neck and cuffed...simple. I guess if you don't want to get your hands dirty you can taze and beat the guy into unconsciousness and then you can cuff him, but that would be called lazy..and I am not saying they are, but they sure projected that image.

[ 2013-09-06, 11:17 PM: Message edited by: CobramanPhil ]
 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com