united states responsible for chemical attacks in syria?

This is topic united states responsible for chemical attacks in syria? in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners .

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=059036

Posted by 0089GT (Member # 9996) on :

alex jones....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwZ5B7dPRfA

Posted by ECOboostin (Member # 4347) on :

I'll be honest. I don't give a shit about some 3rd world country

Posted by x Raelsmar x (Member # 9804) on :

quote:
Originally posted by ECOboostin:
I'll be honest. I don't give a shit about some 3rd world country

Posted by Ham'nEggs (Member # 8967) on :

^^^Ditto [patriot]

Posted by red5o (Member # 12651) on :

Sh!t know I don't know what to believe

Posted by wilit (Member # 3367) on :

Syria is a lose-lose situation politically for the US. Either we back Assad, a leader we have been at odds with for a long time, or we back the rebels which have strong Islamist extremist views (i.e. Muslim Brotherhood). Either way, we end up with another enemy in the region. It's truly a case of, which is the lesser evil.

Posted by 2T0NE (Member # 4216) on :

God bless america [patriot]

Posted by SLOWBACK 67 (Member # 6348) on :

It's all about the oil pipelines & the US Dollar.

Posted by 0089GT (Member # 9996) on :

quote:
Originally posted by ECOboostin:
I'll be honest. I don't give a shit about some 3rd world country

Ww3 is on the brink of happening.

Posted by a302juGRnot (Member # 10163) on :

3rd world countries are no joke. It's crazy how good we have it and we should feel lucky. Alotta pple in the world with bigger n better problems out of their control.

Posted by 2Foxes2Five0Coupes (Member # 9154) on :

quote:
Originally posted by wilit:
Syria is a lose-lose situation politically for the US. Either we back Assad, a leader we have been at odds with for a long time, or we back the rebels which have strong Islamist extremist views (i.e. Muslim Brotherhood). Either way, we end up with another enemy in the region. It's truly a case of, which is the lesser evil.

Backing the "rebels" is backing alqueda (the database) who all of the western countries and "responsible" Arab countries have already backed. They are the most extreme group to back. They have cut the organs out of the dead Syrian army soldiers and eaten them on camera on YouTube. They have sawed off the heads of Muslim, Christian, and other religious leaders with dull knives also on camera. I guess alqueda are the good guys now. They also are also the ones who used the chemical weapons everytime there's been a report of these types of weapons being used. If the US bombs Syria its to help the "rebels" (alkada) who have been getting wiped out by the SAA even though they have all of this foreign backing . The "rebels" are already coordinating an offensive if the US and allies attack. The promise of "no boots on the ground" is because we already have them on the ground but they are getting their asses handed to them. The "red line "has been crossed many of times as a false flag for them the "rebels" to get help from the US .

Posted by i (Member # 12534) on :

STUPID Foreign policy!

Posted by PeNiNsula302 (Member # 1061) on :

quote:
Originally posted by 2Foxes2Five0Coupes:

quote:
Originally posted by wilit:
Syria is a lose-lose situation politically for the US. Either we back Assad, a leader we have been at odds with for a long time, or we back the rebels which have strong Islamist extremist views (i.e. Muslim Brotherhood). Either way, we end up with another enemy in the region. It's truly a case of, which is the lesser evil.
Backing the "rebels" is backing alqueda (the database) who all of the western countries and "responsible" Arab countries have already backed. They are the most extreme group to back. They have cut the organs out of the dead Syrian army soldiers and eaten them on camera on YouTube. They have sawed off the heads of Muslim, Christian, and other religious leaders with dull knives also on camera. I guess alqueda are the good guys now. They also are also the ones who used the chemical weapons everytime there's been a report of these types of weapons being used. If the US bombs Syria its to help the "rebels" (alkada) who have been getting wiped out by the SAA even though they have all of this foreign backing . The "rebels" are already coordinating an offensive if the US and allies attack. The promise of "no boots on the ground" is because we already have them on the ground but they are getting their asses handed to them. The "red line "has been crossed many of times as a false flag for them the "rebels" to get help from the US .

Posted by Wildfire532FB (Member # 1482) on :

quote:
Originally posted by x Raelsmar x:

quote:
Originally posted by ECOboostin:
I'll be honest. I don't give a shit about some 3rd world country

Posted by FiveOhChuck (Member # 12588) on :

http://youtu.be/ehbBQYg8q-k
Yeah "god bless America"

Posted by x Raelsmar x (Member # 9804) on :

I say we have a nice world sit down and discuss blowing up all these shitty non contributional countries. Fuck it.

Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com