T O P I C R E V I E W
|
LXjames
Member # 10791
|
posted
I'm looking for comparison pictures of cars with sportlines no isolators and h&r ss no isolators. Foxbodies please let me know what you got suspension wise just looking to go low and I've seen some cars on ss' that look lower than my sportlines so let's see em! Give me all the low you got!!
|
coupe5oh
Member # 10411
|
posted
when I had em on my 95 they were the same height as the sportlines..they just felt different
|
NorCalRydaz
Member # 3233
|
posted
Sportlines almost always sag more in the back for the piasa look. H&R look lower and more aggressive
|
925_GT
Member # 11891
|
posted
Someone wants to go lower.
|
SIC9250
Member # 8216
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by NorCalRydaz: Sportlines almost always sag more in the back for the piasa look. H&R look lower and more aggressive
I've ran sportlines on almost all my 16 mustangs and never had a saggin ass lol,shit I always had to cut a coil out the rear an 1/2 in the front to get the look Im goin for,eibachs always have the car's ass higher than the front...
|
NorCalRydaz
Member # 3233
|
posted
Weird. Cause I always have to cut a coil or a coil and a half out the fronts. Eibachs never looked good enough for me out the box. I'm talking about foxbodys of course. Guess I just like like the front a tad lower than the back
|
rdiaz89
Member # 12890
|
posted
H&R SS perfect stance... but with LTS scrape everywhere
|
a302juGRnot
Member # 10163
|
posted
I have the upr Coilovers in the front and my shit is dumped. Then again u can adjust it exactly how u like it so I'd recommend them. I have an IRS rear with h&r ss and 1 coil cut but it's gonna be diff with the sra so I don't kno how it would sit.
|
Sydewayz Stan
Member # 10217
|
posted
h&r performs better. eibachs are everywhere and super cheap but go for the h&r's
|
SIC9250
Member # 8216
|
posted
Intrax springs
|