Author
|
Topic: Need some opinions
|
69stang
¯
Member # 5609
|
posted
I'm thinking about buying a 61-65 ranchero or falcon or a 65-70 mustang... So which would you buy and keep in mind it is a project
Thanks
-------------------- 1968 firebird- sold 1992 mustang gt - sold 1969 mustang coupe- current project
Posts: 809 | From: 707 | Registered: Apr 2005
| :
|
|
rayski25
¯
Member # 11363
|
posted
66 or 69 mustang If you can find one in decent shape, if you find a 66 throw a 351w with a 4 speed or find your self a 69 an go all original either way you go be prepaired for all the thongs your gona collect in the trunk.
-------------------- 66 mustang v6 converted to 351w(sold) 89 mustang lx(sold) 88 mustang gt(current DD)
Posts: 319 | From: modesto | Registered: Oct 2011
| :
|
|
nitrous_bob
CAFords OG
Member # 77
|
posted
65 or 66 A code as #1 65 or 66 anything as #2
sure you can do an "elenor" with a '67 or '68 if you want
but '65/'66 is tha shizz IMO
-------------------- 5.0 OG since 1990
Posts: 1402 | From: st clair shores MI | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
SantaClara_Cobra
¯
Member # 9488
|
posted
Mustang
-------------------- 18 Denali diesel 91 🦊
Posts: 1399 | From: San Jose | Registered: Sep 2009
| :
|
|
69stang
¯
Member # 5609
|
posted
So I found a 69 mustang coupe shell for 200 minus the doors and all suspension parts.... Do you guys think its worth it?
-------------------- 1968 firebird- sold 1992 mustang gt - sold 1969 mustang coupe- current project
Posts: 809 | From: 707 | Registered: Apr 2005
| :
|
|
rayski25
¯
Member # 11363
|
posted
Naw it's not worth it just give me the phone number and address of where it's at!!! Lol jk yeah I think that's a hell of a deal as long as its not totally beat to crap
-------------------- 66 mustang v6 converted to 351w(sold) 89 mustang lx(sold) 88 mustang gt(current DD)
Posts: 319 | From: modesto | Registered: Oct 2011
| :
|
|
DEVERO2
¯
Member # 6155
|
posted
if you can afford a fast back any year mustang would be nice. 69-70 coupes look almost as bad as any 71-73. if you are looking for a coupe 67 is the best looking year for coupes. Falcons are bad ass and you dont see them as much
Posts: 641 | From: sacramento | Registered: Oct 2005
| :
|
|
TopNotch T-TOP
¯
Member # 9599
|
posted
GO WITH A 67 COUPE THEY SEEM TO BE MOST DESIRED AMONG COUPES BETWEEN THE YEARS 64-68
-------------------- 1984 T-TOP NOTCHBACK MUSTANG 1993 Svt Cobra
Posts: 864 | Registered: Nov 2009
| :
|
|
COBRA50
¯
Member # 11614
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by topnotcht-top: GO WITH A 67 COUPE THEY SEEM TO BE MOST DESIRED AMONG COUPES BETWEEN THE YEARS 64-68
+1
-------------------- 94 SVT BLOWN LIGHTNING
Posts: 166 | From: RWC | Registered: Jan 2012
| :
|
|
wilit
Mustang Messiah
Member # 3367
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by topnotcht-top: GO WITH A 67 COUPE THEY SEEM TO BE MOST DESIRED AMONG COUPES BETWEEN THE YEARS 64-68
IMO, the '67 is the most difficult year to restore because of all the mid-production changes made. It's half '66 and half '68. The '67-'68 are the best styled Mustangs though.
-------------------- "If a man hasn't found something worth dying for, he isn't fit to live." - Martin Luther King Jr.
Posts: 4793 | From: 37.78514° North 122.40100° West | Registered: Oct 2003
| :
|
|
69stang
¯
Member # 5609
|
posted
So the 69 isn't worth it
-------------------- 1968 firebird- sold 1992 mustang gt - sold 1969 mustang coupe- current project
Posts: 809 | From: 707 | Registered: Apr 2005
| :
|
|
SydeWaySix
CAFords OG
Member # 3596
|
posted
'69 and up coupes are ugly as hell! Stick to the 64-68 models...but if you're talking about fastback, then 69/70 are good too!
-------------------- 2013 Boss 302 #356. Performance White. Stock. 1965 Fastback GT Restored to stock spec.
Posts: 9882 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Dec 2002
| :
|
|
69stang
¯
Member # 5609
|
posted
What about a 61 ranchero ?
-------------------- 1968 firebird- sold 1992 mustang gt - sold 1969 mustang coupe- current project
Posts: 809 | From: 707 | Registered: Apr 2005
| :
|
|