|
Author
|
Topic: New edge 5.0
|
|
|
1sicmaro
~ I <3 Moms ~
Member # 9734
|
posted
 
 
Lame!
Posts: 231 | From: bay area | Registered: Jan 2010
| :
|
|
MaK_1967v8
¯
Member # 12187
|
posted
well seeing how it was originally a v6 99... i say kudos. pretty cool swap seeing how he said it was simply a bolt in and wire up swap.
--------------------
1967 C Code Coupe
2004 Roush Stage 2
Posts: 620 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Jul 2012
| :
|
|
Ric88Notch
¯
Member # 11660
|
posted
Do it swang ?
--------------------
2013 Black GT
Posts: 514 | From: STOCKTON | Registered: Feb 2012
| :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SwEeT03Gt
¯
Member # 10283
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Greasy:
quote:
Originally posted by SwEeT 03 Gt:
it make less power than a v2/v3 99-04 gt
437rwhp @15.5psi
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mIDNvmvxKc&feature=bf_prev&list=ULf5gRjPxOKe0
you'll make that with just 9-10psi on a similiar vortec
I'd still take that pushrod engine over a 2V or 3V modular.
i'll take the 408w you got in your sig ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif) , but not an everyday 302. and you quoted me before my edit with the mach 1 4v carb'd engine
a 281 2v full bolt on's hci will make the same as a 302 hci bolt mustang. only thing is the a fox body is lighter, but that irrelevant since this is a new edge mustang
[ October 02, 2012, 02:31 PM: Message edited by: SwEeT 03 Gt ]
Posts: 4484 | From: -NicKlE n DiMe- | Registered: Sep 2010
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
