This is topic New Boss 302 Laguna Vs. ZL1 Camaro in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=053633

Posted by Chavez66 (Member # 9812) on :
 
they should wait to put that thing up against the GT500 to make it a little more interesting [patriot]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=OE4AH4DZtEI&NR=1
 
Posted by dmostz (Member # 11760) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Chavez66:
they should wait to put that thing up against the GT500 to make it a little more interesting [patriot]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=OE4AH4DZtEI&NR=1

Much agreed.. Even so, 140hp difference and only 2 seconds faster? Not impressed.
 
Posted by Chavez66 (Member # 9812) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dmostz:
quote:
Originally posted by Chavez66:
they should wait to put that thing up against the GT500 to make it a little more interesting [patriot]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=OE4AH4DZtEI&NR=1

Much agreed.. Even so, 140hp difference and only 2 seconds faster? Not impressed.
exactly what i said, seems like a fail for the ZL1? and i bet that things cost alot more also [Razz]
 
Posted by Rinna90 (Member # 6850) on :
 
I'd take the mustang and the extra 12 grand I would save put them together and smack the maro around all day.
 
Posted by SlowStockFox (Member # 1081) on :
 
all you have to do is add a blower to the mustang or a turbo it will eat up the zl1. i would mutch rather have the stang
 
Posted by SF Coupe (Member # 1810) on :
 
Ouch, lap times don't lie. But, the camaro has a huge advantage in power to weight ratio. That doesn't just add up to the .4 on the straight like the video says. Every corner exit equals more time the camaro is gaining. Kind of a stupid test, equalize the power to weight and then see what happens. That will tell you which chassis really is better.
 
Posted by SwEeT 03 Gt (Member # 10283) on :
 
The boss is faster than a camaro ss by a 1.4 seconds
 
Posted by Blind (Member # 3052) on :
 
word is the new 2013 gt500 is faster than the laguna seca boss at most tracks, so that should be a good comparison for the zl1 [Smile]
 
Posted by Chavez66 (Member # 9812) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Blind:
word is the new 2013 gt500 is faster than the laguna seca boss at most tracks, so that should be a good comparison for the zl1 [Smile]

That's what I'm waiting for, even out the playing field with price range, and power
 
Posted by copcar (Member # 10113) on :
 
I read that comparison the other day and knew about it several months back. It is by far the worst example of irresponsible automotive journalism I have ever encountered. Had this run across my desk I would have sent the contributor packing. Completely irrelevant comparison and reeks of pandering to an already faltering Camaro image. (Then again, why am I not surprised.) The Boss (5.0 Mustang in general,too) has already proven itself in the court of public opinion in terms of styling and has solidified a place in automotive history on the merit of an established SCCA record and Formuls D pedigree going back to 2005.

In layman's terms...
Fucking stupidest test comparison ever.
 
Posted by Wrenchin (Member # 9529) on :
 
It didn't do bad, this is why people use 140HP Miatas and keep up with cars with twice as much power in autocross.

The mustang was 400LB's underweight, the GT500 is going to be as heavy, if not heavier than the ZL1.

OH, Just throw a supercharger on the mustang! (no shit, they are already doing that...)
 
Posted by a302juGRnuat (Member # 10163) on :
 
well like the guy said, even with the power disparity, it still would have gone 2 seconds slower. but i deff agree that the gt500 is the car to compare.
 
Posted by Chavez66 (Member # 9812) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by copcar:
I read that comparison the other day and knew about it several months back. It is by far the worst example of irresponsible automotive journalism I have ever encountered. Had this run across my desk I would have sent the contributor packing. Completely irrelevant comparison and reeks of pandering to an already faltering Camaro image. (Then again, why am I not surprised.) The Boss (5.0 Mustang in general,too) has already proven itself in the court of public opinion in terms of styling and has solidified a place in automotive history on the merit of an established SCCA record and Formuls D pedigree going back to 2005.

In layman's terms...
Fucking stupidest test comparison ever.

Well said I totally agree, I don't think there even on the same level and way too one sided
 
Posted by 50DADDY (Member # 3076) on :
 
Camaros suck and theyre ugly too.Lol. [patriot]
 
Posted by SL0BRA650 (Member # 10274) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 50DADDY:
Camaros suck and theyre ugly too.Lol. [patriot]

Well said aha I can't wait for the Shelby and ZL1 Vid to come out
 
Posted by Venomousnotch (Member # 8695) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 50DADDY:
Camaros suck and theyre ugly too.Lol. [patriot]

I agree with you 100% [worship] [worship] [worship] [worship]
 
Posted by 87MclarenMustang (Member # 10695) on :
 
I highly doubt that Chevy will allow their zl1 to run against the gt500 cause they don't want Ford to put them to shame... Their car wouldn't stand a chance even they they're running a 6.2 against a 5.8! Ford FTW!
 
Posted by 85TTOP (Member # 9536) on :
 
Yeah that's what i was thinking. How do they compare a supercharged with a non supercharged car and test it to see who's faster. Mustang with no blower still kept up and is right behind. so I'll give it to the Shelby which I highly doubt they would do because it would put Chevy in a bad spot and would ruin their hopes to keep up with ford.
 
Posted by iceman302 (Member # 7180) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wrenchin:
It didn't do bad, this is why people use 140HP Miatas and keep up with cars with twice as much power in autocross.

The mustang was 400LB's underweight, the GT500 is going to be as heavy, if not heavier than the ZL1.

OH, Just throw a supercharger on the mustang! (no shit, they are already doing that...)

Not a chance. The new GT500 is a good 300 pounds lighter than the ZL1. It weighs in around 3800.
 
Posted by Chavez66 (Member # 9812) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by iceman302:
quote:
Originally posted by Wrenchin:
It didn't do bad, this is why people use 140HP Miatas and keep up with cars with twice as much power in autocross.

The mustang was 400LB's underweight, the GT500 is going to be as heavy, if not heavier than the ZL1.

OH, Just throw a supercharger on the mustang! (no shit, they are already doing that...)

Not a chance. The new GT500 is a good 300 pounds lighter than the ZL1. It weighs in around 3800.
You sir are correct, I only have 1 picture to put these questions to rest. The camaro is just ugly ass hell and can't compete with looks of the GT500

 -
 
Posted by 65mustang408 (Member # 8681) on :
 
win!
 -
 
Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on :
 
And I'll raise you a
 -
 
Posted by 65mustang408 (Member # 8681) on :
 
Riase you a ZR1
 -
 
Posted by Slowback67 (Member # 6348) on :
 
^ I raise you a Saleen S7 TT
Checkmate [Cool]
Find a Chevy better then that. [Wink]
 
Posted by 65mustang408 (Member # 8681) on :
 
LINGENFELTER TT Z06 1100rwhp pump gas.
 
Posted by Wolfie351 (Member # 651) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 65mustang408:
LINGENFELTER TT Z06 1100rwhp pump gas.

You might want to compare curb weights before you bench race. The Saleen is under 3000lbs
 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com