T O P I C R E V I E W
|
302n/a
Member # 1465
|
posted
thinking of buying a 95gt auto whats your average hci dyno around for an auto?and quarter mile times?
|
CornOil_&_Boost
Member # 5888
|
posted
Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them. [ January 25, 2012, 12:43 PM: Message edited by: CornOil_&_Boost ]
|
DIRTY SALLY
Member # 7845
|
posted
1.000.000 HP! HAHHAHAHAHAHA!
|
302n/a
Member # 1465
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost: Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
so a stock 99-04gt will probable beat it?
|
RONIN
Member # 9987
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost: Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
I doubt that ..... A bone stock 94/95 5 Liter would be lucky to even see 180-200 hp and 220-240 in torque. However I do agree that they are underpowered heavy pigs . There's far more restrictive parts on them i.e. why they make so little power . I'll try pull up some dyno charts of what a bone stock SN-95 makes and post them up.
|
losbadgts
Member # 4394
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 302n/a: quote: Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost: Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
so a stock 99-04gt will probable beat it?
The right driver on the 99-04 gt and yes it will beat it all day lol.
|
Luke87GT
Member # 21
|
posted
Your average automatic 94-95 GT with HCI is going to be neck and neck with a bone stock Nissan Maxima owned by your mom.
Best of luck.
|
hidnn.o.s.
Member # 1219
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by RONIN: quote: Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost: Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
I doubt that ..... A bone stock 94/95 5 Liter would be lucky to even see 180-200 hp and 220-240 in torque. However I do agree that they are underpowered heavy pigs . There's far more restrictive parts on them i.e. why they make so little power . I'll try pull up some dyno charts of what a bone stock SN-95 makes and post them up.
|
SydeWaySix
Member # 3596
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Luke87GT: Your average automatic 94-95 GT with HCI is going to be neck and neck with a bone stock Nissan Maxima owned by your mom.
Best of luck.
the painful truth
|
stangrus95
Member # 10653
|
posted
My 95 made 275rwhp and 321rwtq with h/c/i but its a 5speed
|
Blind
Member # 3052
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by RONIN: quote: Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost: Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
I doubt that ..... A bone stock 94/95 5 Liter would be lucky to even see 180-200 hp and 220-240 in torque. However I do agree that they are underpowered heavy pigs . There's far more restrictive parts on them i.e. why they make so little power . I'll try pull up some dyno charts of what a bone stock SN-95 makes and post them up.
the question is what they would make with h/c/i, not stock.
|
CornOil_&_Boost
Member # 5888
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by RONIN: quote: Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost: Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
I doubt that ..... A bone stock 94/95 5 Liter would be lucky to even see 180-200 hp and 220-240 in torque. However I do agree that they are underpowered heavy pigs . There's far more restrictive parts on them i.e. why they make so little power . I'll try pull up some dyno charts of what a bone stock SN-95 makes and post them up.
|
RONIN
Member # 9987
|
posted
I guess I missed the hci part..... They're still slugs though
Fuck you cornoil ... Lol [ January 25, 2012, 03:26 PM: Message edited by: RONIN ]
|
Platinum Detail
Member # 8026
|
posted
I owned a 95 cobra (stock 240 hp) on the dyno it was 167 rwhp. I was pissed. A GT stock is 215 hp , which is 25 less than a cobra which im sure rwhp is around 142. http://www.mustangspecs.com/years/95.shtml
After full intake and exhaust upgrade I dyno'd 240 rwhp . After going with 306, afr's 165 and track heat I doyno'd 320 rwhp with shorties ,smog and carb legal (minus track heat) My 2cents after spending over 6 grand on motor and tranny I expected more
[ January 25, 2012, 03:52 PM: Message edited by: Platinum Detail ]
|
5.0 LsX
Member # 10017
|
posted
put an ls1 in it for not much more $$, 350rwhp stock & 28mpg
|
CornOil_&_Boost
Member # 5888
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 5.0 LsX: put an ls1 in it for not much more $$, 350rwhp stock & 28mpg
never seen LS1 STOCK dyno 350RW without at least an intake and long tubes and a tune...
now an LS6...yes [ January 25, 2012, 06:46 PM: Message edited by: CornOil_&_Boost ]
|