|
Author
|
Topic: whats your average 94 -95 auto dyno
|
302n/a
¯
Member # 1465
|
posted
 
 
thinking of buying a 95gt auto whats your average hci dyno around for an auto?and quarter mile times?
--------------------
Raiders A's Warriors Sharks
Posts: 2605 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
CornOil_&_Boost
¯
Member # 5888
|
posted
Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
[ January 25, 2012, 12:43 PM: Message edited by: CornOil_&_Boost ]
--------------------
https://www.facebook.com/pushrodpoweredmustangs
'95 Cobra - small engine / small turbo -
'02 Excursion 7.3 - tow vehicle
'14 - Chevy Volt - DD
Posts: 5097 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
DIRTY SALLY
¯
Member # 7845
|
posted
1.000.000 HP! HAHHAHAHAHAHA!
--------------------
---------
Savage Habits
instagram @2cheezen
Posts: 9145 | Registered: Aug 2007
| :
|
|
302n/a
¯
Member # 1465
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost:
Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
so a stock 99-04gt will probable beat it?
--------------------
Raiders A's Warriors Sharks
Posts: 2605 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
coupedup
¯
Member # 9987
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost:
Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
I doubt that ..... A bone stock 94/95 5 Liter would be lucky to even see 180-200 hp and 220-240 in torque. However I do agree that they are underpowered heavy pigs . There's far more restrictive parts on them i.e. why they make so little power . I'll try pull up some dyno charts of what a bone stock SN-95 makes and post them up.
Posts: 4406 | From: Ca | Registered: May 2010
| :
|
|
losbadgts
¯
Member # 4394
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 302n/a:
quote:
Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost:
Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
so a stock 99-04gt will probable beat it?
The right driver on the 99-04 gt and yes it will beat it all day lol.
--------------------
Why pretent someone u are not, everyone else could see it.
Posts: 3625 | From: redwood city | Registered: Apr 2004
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
Your average automatic 94-95 GT with HCI is going to be neck and neck with a bone stock Nissan Maxima owned by your mom.
Best of luck.
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
hidnn.o.s.
¯
Member # 1219
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by RONIN:
quote:
Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost:
Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
I doubt that ..... A bone stock 94/95 5 Liter would be lucky to even see 180-200 hp and 220-240 in torque. However I do agree that they are underpowered heavy pigs . There's far more restrictive parts on them i.e. why they make so little power . I'll try pull up some dyno charts of what a bone stock SN-95 makes and post them up.
![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
R.I.P. Willie G. You are missed on this forum
Posts: 15950 | Registered: Apr 2002
| :
|
|
SydeWaySix
CAFords OG
Member # 3596
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Luke87GT:
Your average automatic 94-95 GT with HCI is going to be neck and neck with a bone stock Nissan Maxima owned by your mom.
Best of luck.
the painful truth ![[dance]](graemlins/dance.gif)
--------------------
2013 Boss 302 #356. Performance White. Stock.
1965 Fastback GT Restored to stock spec.
Posts: 9882 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Dec 2002
| :
|
|
stangrus95
¯
Member # 10653
|
posted
My 95 made 275rwhp and 321rwtq with h/c/i but its a 5speed
--------------------
Damned if you do...
Damned if you don't...
1995 5.0 mustang gt-275/321--kid napped :(
1990 5.0 mustang gt-sold
Posts: 294 | From: 510 | Registered: Feb 2011
| :
|
|
Blind
2.3L
CAFords OG
Member # 3052
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by RONIN:
quote:
Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost:
Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
I doubt that ..... A bone stock 94/95 5 Liter would be lucky to even see 180-200 hp and 220-240 in torque. However I do agree that they are underpowered heavy pigs . There's far more restrictive parts on them i.e. why they make so little power . I'll try pull up some dyno charts of what a bone stock SN-95 makes and post them up.
the question is what they would make with h/c/i, not stock.
--------------------
89 LX Notchback ex 4cyl, 14psi
02 Harley F150, 15psi
Posts: 8521 | From: Fairfield | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
CornOil_&_Boost
¯
Member # 5888
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by RONIN:
quote:
Originally posted by CornOil_&_Boost:
Probably around 250-270rw and high13s/low14s....the 95 gt's were slow, underpowered, and heavy pigs....
You need a tune to actually get anything out of them.
I doubt that ..... A bone stock 94/95 5 Liter would be lucky to even see 180-200 hp and 220-240 in torque. However I do agree that they are underpowered heavy pigs . There's far more restrictive parts on them i.e. why they make so little power . I'll try pull up some dyno charts of what a bone stock SN-95 makes and post them up.
--------------------
https://www.facebook.com/pushrodpoweredmustangs
'95 Cobra - small engine / small turbo -
'02 Excursion 7.3 - tow vehicle
'14 - Chevy Volt - DD
Posts: 5097 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
coupedup
¯
Member # 9987
|
posted
I guess I missed the hci part..... They're still slugs though
Fuck you cornoil ... Lol
[ January 25, 2012, 03:26 PM: Message edited by: RONIN ]
Posts: 4406 | From: Ca | Registered: May 2010
| :
|
|
Platinum Detail
¯
Member # 8026
|
posted
I owned a 95 cobra (stock 240 hp) on the dyno it was 167 rwhp. ![[Confused]](confused.gif) I was pissed. A GT stock is 215 hp , which is 25 less than a cobra which im sure rwhp is around 142. http://www.mustangspecs.com/years/95.shtml
After full intake and exhaust upgrade I dyno'd 240 rwhp . After going with 306, afr's 165 and track heat I doyno'd 320 rwhp with shorties ,smog and carb legal (minus track heat) My 2cents after spending over 6 grand on motor and tranny I expected more ![[Frown]](frown.gif)
[ January 25, 2012, 03:52 PM: Message edited by: Platinum Detail ]
Posts: 179 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
5.0 LsX
¯
Member # 10017
|
posted
put an ls1 in it for not much more $$, 350rwhp stock & 28mpg
--------------------
91' Notch
Posts: 1260 | Registered: May 2010
| :
|
|
CornOil_&_Boost
¯
Member # 5888
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 5.0 LsX:
put an ls1 in it for not much more $$, 350rwhp stock & 28mpg
never seen LS1 STOCK dyno 350RW without at least an intake and long tubes and a tune...
now an LS6...yes
[ January 25, 2012, 06:46 PM: Message edited by: CornOil_&_Boost ]
--------------------
https://www.facebook.com/pushrodpoweredmustangs
'95 Cobra - small engine / small turbo -
'02 Excursion 7.3 - tow vehicle
'14 - Chevy Volt - DD
Posts: 5097 | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
