|
Author
|
Topic: AED Tomorrow
|
MikeD.
¯
Member # 8060
|
posted
 
 
Going in for a few pulls tomorrow! Hopefully im CLOSE to 300rw. Whats your guys' guesstimates?
GT40Ps
B303
1.7s
Exploder intake
1 3/4 LTs
Ill post graph and videos tomorrow evening!
I say 276/330
--------------------
1999 FRC Vette
12.77 @ 110
Posts: 2854 | From: Vacaville Ca, 707 | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
Stangn5oh
¯
Member # 10875
|
posted
Im sorry bro im guessing 260 tops.
Please give more description, i thnk u left a couple things out do you have full exhaust or headers or sumthn more than just what you stated ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
88 lx
17 Renegade turbo
18 Compass 4x4
Hit the gasser, go faster, all u heard was dual exhaust n flowmasters.
Posts: 1643 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Apr 2011
| :
|
|
Blind
2.3L
CAFords OG
Member # 3052
|
posted
I'd hope it's more than that, I made 249rwhp/290rwtq with stock heads/cam/rockers/intake/tb/everything from tb to oil pan stock as a baseline in my coupe.
Just short belt, longtubes, and 16* timing with 91.
--------------------
89 LX Notchback ex 4cyl, 14psi
02 Harley F150, 15psi
Posts: 8521 | From: Fairfield | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
It will be interesting to see what it lays down. What supporting mods do you have and are you getting tuned or just dyno?
I'd going to say high 270s SAE, mid 280s STD (If I recall AED shows STD numbers).
Remember, less steep gears and lighter wheels will shower higher power too.
Best of luck.
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Blind:
I'd hope it's more than that, I made 249rwhp/290rwtq with stock heads/cam/rockers/intake/tb/everything from tb to oil pan stock as a baseline in my coupe.
Just short belt, longtubes, and 16* timing with 91.
Both of your cars put down more power for the mods than any I ever heard. 249rwhp with short belt, long tubes, and timing is not the norm... (then again I have no idea what correction factor your dyno operator was using)
[ January 04, 2012, 04:13 PM: Message edited by: Luke87GT ]
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
SnakeBit
¯
Member # 8871
|
posted
Im going to say 270hp/285tq. Sorry but those previous numbers sound a little inflated for just having long tubes & timing. Good luck
--------------------
91 Coupe full M/M suspension
Maier WideBody
331 356 RWHP 357 RWTQ
Tuned by TPS MotorSports
Posts: 2707 | From: Fremont | Registered: Jan 2009
| :
|
|
Eddie510-
CAFords OG
Member # 2354
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Blind:
I'd hope it's more than that, I made 249rwhp/290rwtq with stock heads/cam/rockers/intake/tb/everything from tb to oil pan stock as a baseline in my coupe.
Just short belt, longtubes, and 16* timing with 91.
Nice ... Thats exactly what i had in my lx but with crane rockers .. went around 235/ 300 tq ! car went 13.9 with bald tires ... added 100 nx .. went 12.6 ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
--------------------
"I like to be more politicaly correct than what I really believe so I can get more frinds here on CaFords"-Cummings "TIPICKLE"
Posts: 6557 | Registered: Jan 2003
| :
|
|
Blind
2.3L
CAFords OG
Member # 3052
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Luke87GT:
quote:
Originally posted by Blind:
I'd hope it's more than that, I made 249rwhp/290rwtq with stock heads/cam/rockers/intake/tb/everything from tb to oil pan stock as a baseline in my coupe.
Just short belt, longtubes, and 16* timing with 91.
Both of your cars put down more power for the mods than any I ever heard. 249rwhp with short belt, long tubes, and timing is not the norm... (then again I have no idea what correction factor your dyno operator was using)
Mr lxcoupe Christian made 2rwhp more than my coupe with the same stuff ![[Wink]](wink.gif) Mine made ~5rwtq more though, but still pissed me off.
it ran 13.01 @ 104mph in this trim.
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e237/blindbatts/mustang/89dyno2.jpg
remember though, "shortbelt" on my car was just crank/waterpump/3g alt and a mark8 fan. I had a flaming river manual steering setup, a race crank pully, and underdrive on waterpump. The p/s pump is good for a few hp.
[ January 04, 2012, 04:59 PM: Message edited by: Blind ]
--------------------
89 LX Notchback ex 4cyl, 14psi
02 Harley F150, 15psi
Posts: 8521 | From: Fairfield | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
98 ROUSH
¯
Member # 10309
|
posted
272hp/297tq
--------------------
Built 2v
Stroked, Cammed and Blown
Advanced Auto Built & Kurgan Tuned
Posts: 4679 | From: North Hayward, Cali | Registered: Sep 2010
| :
|
|
stackss2
¯
Member # 10071
|
posted
Good luck. im going to aed on friday to get my car tuned
Posts: 52 | From: hayward | Registered: Jun 2010
| :
|
|
BIGBALLFACTOR
¯
Member # 7277
|
posted
johnb built the engine i guess 220 at the wheels
Posts: 6908 | From: okc | Registered: Dec 2006
| :
|
|
MikeD.
¯
Member # 8060
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by SS396 chevelle:
johnb built the engine i guess 220 at the wheels
Why such a smart ass!
You know this won't break 210....
Well, I listed only the stuff that makes a real difference in power, but since you asked...
70mm tb
O/R H pipe w/ single chambers
Under drive pullys
E-fan
3.55s
Uhhhhh.... Some other stuff.
Well that's the important things I guess.
--------------------
1999 FRC Vette
12.77 @ 110
Posts: 2854 | From: Vacaville Ca, 707 | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
50Reasons
¯
Member # 6452
|
posted
isay 260 to 280
Posts: 9483 | From: Sacramento Ca | Registered: Jan 2006
| :
|
|
NEIGHT
¯
Member # 8741
|
posted
304 rwhp 356 torque
--------------------
-Savage Habits-
1992 Summer Edition
1986 Hatch- catfish killer
1964 Impala hard top
Posts: 18579 | From: EA$T $IDE REDWOOD CITY | Registered: Nov 2008
| :
|
|
Camara90
1%
Member # 134
|
posted
280/325.. are you tuning it on the dyno, or just making pulls?
--------------------
92GT,stock short block,9:1 TFS 170's,perf rpm,custom cam,1 5/8 shorties,C4 trans.
std. 356hp, 350tq
11.85@111.9mph on motor.
Posts: 2351 | From: 707 | Registered: Jan 2001
| :
|
|
MikeD.
¯
Member # 8060
|
posted
Just good old timing a fp.
--------------------
1999 FRC Vette
12.77 @ 110
Posts: 2854 | From: Vacaville Ca, 707 | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
moeofit32
¯
Member # 10393
|
posted
i dont think your going to hit 300 with the setup but car should hit about 275
--------------------
95 stroked and blown cobra
Posts: 2387 | From: antioch ca | Registered: Oct 2010
| :
|
|
1RaW03SvT
¯
Member # 9151
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by MikeD.:
Going in for a few pulls tomorrow! Hopefully im CLOSE to 300rw. Whats your guys' guesstimates?
GT40Ps
B303
1.7s
Exploder intake
1 3/4 LTs
Ill post graph and videos tomorrow evening!
I say 276/330
GOOD LUCK
![[BS flag]](graemlins/bs_flag.gif)
--------------------
2003 SoNiC BlUe CoBrA
BUILT
Posts: 2159 | From: *SVTaDDicT* | Registered: May 2009
| :
|
|
MikeD.
¯
Member # 8060
|
posted
Well I guess well see what happens fellas!
--------------------
1999 FRC Vette
12.77 @ 110
Posts: 2854 | From: Vacaville Ca, 707 | Registered: Nov 2007
| :
|
|
88FOX
¯
Member # 9969
|
posted
Any port work to the heads and intake?
Posts: 1938 | From: bay area | Registered: Apr 2010
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by MikeD.:
quote:
Originally posted by SS396 chevelle:
johnb built the engine i guess 220 at the wheels
Why such a smart ass!
You know this won't break 210....
Well, I listed only the stuff that makes a real difference in power, but since you asked...
70mm tb
O/R H pipe w/ single chambers
Under drive pullys
E-fan
3.55s
Uhhhhh.... Some other stuff.
Well that's the important things I guess.
Mike,
Off-road exhaust, a catback, underdrives, and e-fan could be worth as much as 15-20rwhp at high RPM. I'd say that's a real difference in power ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Also, the 3.55s will show more power on the dyno than a 3.73 or a 4.10 so that's in your favor as well.
Make sure to note the correction factor so folks can compare apples to apples.
And Kevin, your "shortbelt and long tubes" was actually long-tubes, under-drive pullies with a race crank, manual steering rack and e-fan? Did you have a cat-back and Hpipe? What about a CAI or K&N?
Are you in sales and marketing by any chance? ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
Slow05GT
¯
Member # 8408
|
posted
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.
But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!
Posts: 2233 | From: Natomas, ca | Registered: May 2008
| :
|
|
Smoked50
¯
Member # 9592
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 98z28:
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.
But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!
You're comparing 87-93 to 98-02 ![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
--------------------
1993 4 Cyl - 68 RWHP
I live my life a quarter mile at a time. For those 25 seconds or less, I'm free.
Posts: 2262 | From: EB | Registered: Nov 2009
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 98z28:
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.
But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!
In your world cars are also heavy, unreliable, have cheap plastic interiors, and look like cat-fish
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
SlowStockFox
Stock Fox
Member # 1081
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Luke87GT:
quote:
Originally posted by 98z28:
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.
But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!
In your world cars are also heavy, unreliable, have cheap plastic interiors, and look like cat-fish
haha
--------------------
i walk around....dont drink and drive
Posts: 2957 | From: cali | Registered: Mar 2002
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
