Author
|
Topic: Wolverine Fastback
|
|
sj9ers
¯
Member # 9860
|
posted
Wtf?! Are they using real fastbacks for this?
-------------------- 1967 Mustang
Posts: 129 | From: San Jose | Registered: Mar 2010
| :
|
|
Chavez66
¯
Member # 9812
|
posted
DAm the only thing I would keep on that car is the engine N put it in a real Fasback, dam RIP and at 125Gs dam
-------------------- WWW.50Reasonscarclub.com
Posts: 1694 | From: Dont worry about it | Registered: Feb 2010
| :
|
|
Secnd2nun64
¯
Member # 1431
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by sj9ers: Wtf?! Are they using real fastbacks for this?
Looks like they are. Found this pic on their webpage build.
Posts: 1460 | From: CA | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
bigjerry
¯
Member # 6033
|
posted
doesnt look to bad looks more modernized people are just to stuck on how a car shud look like. If a classic aint rocking thrust torques cragers magnum 500s or a 50 with cobras saleens etc... people will hate
-------------------- 89 GT vert in progress ....
Posts: 435 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Sep 2005
| :
|
|
|
essasin
¯
Member # 4741
|
posted
It killed the lines that made the fastback look good.
Posts: 2402 | Registered: Jul 2004
| :
|
|
VanD
¯
Member # 10410
|
posted
for 125k i could build a car that isnt ugly or tasteless. just saying.
Posts: 113 | From: 650 - 925 | Registered: Oct 2010
| :
|
|
Wildfire532FB
CAFords OG
Member # 1482
|
posted
Wow wtf? That car is ugly.
-------------------- ./_ _ _ ___ __\ (]]]_ _ o _ _[[[) |\_o_ __ __o_/| |__|..........|__| 68 Fastback 84 CJ7 94 HMMWV 95 GT 03 F350 17 Fusion Hybrid
Posts: 17580 | From: 530 | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
copcar
¯
Member # 10113
|
posted
There is no measure or guage which could possibly begin to describe the sevarity of FAIL and scope of poor taste that eye raping, rolling abortion embodies.
-------------------- 12.37@ 109.34.NA 894DA Old Nitto 555 DR's Gt40 irons. B cam/1.7's, All emissions equipment on the car, stock air box. UPR catted X pipe.
Posts: 485 | Registered: Jun 2010
| :
|
|