Dynotuned the Fastback - Northern California Ford Owners

This is topic Dynotuned the Fastback in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners .

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=043615

Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on :

Dynotuned the Fastback yesterday at AED. Pretty happy with the numbers.
514RWHP and 576ft/lbs which equals 617hp and 692tq at the crank on 91 octane
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1so_nbBIekU

[ August 19, 2010, 12:01 AM: Message edited by: WildFire532FB ]

Posted by 91silverbullet (Member # 8668) on :

[worship]

Posted by 89bluenotch (Member # 7454) on :

very nice

Posted by BTLD GT (Member # 5229) on :

You barley even spun that thing.u gonna leave where its at or take it higher?

Posted by 94 N.C.F. GT (Member # 3946) on :

Those are some very nice numbers [patriot]

Posted by 68dustin (Member # 5388) on :

Is that only @ 5100 rpm's? what should that thing red line at?

Posted by John91coupe (Member # 18) on :

That pull went to around 5600 but other pulls went to 6000. No need to spin it much beyond 5500 because peak HP was at 5125.

Posted by Fostang (Member # 3752) on :

Seems kinda low no?

It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.

Posted by SydeWaySix (Member # 3596) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
Seems kinda low no?

It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.

thats what I was thinking...those numbers are definitley nice, but for your setup I'd think you'd see higher numbers [Confused]

Posted by 85notch5.0 (Member # 9804) on :

Around how much does a dyno cost? I wanna test my 85. Im sure they are low numbers but still, id like to know. Beaitiful car and nice numbers for you man. [Smile]

Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on :

quote:
Originally posted by SydeWaySix:

quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
Seems kinda low no?

It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.
thats what I was thinking...those numbers are definitley nice, but for your setup I'd think you'd see higher numbers

Its a 532 and it made 617 crank HP. It made over 1 HP per cubic inch.

Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on :

On a side note, at 2200rpm it made 480ft/lbs of torque at the wheels.

Posted by Pure Stang (Member # 7251) on :

sick. good numbers man congrats [patriot]

Posted by Fostang (Member # 3752) on :

I count rwhp not flywheel hp and there Are plenty of 302's making more than 1 rwhp on this board alone.

quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:

quote:
Originally posted by SydeWaySix:

quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
Seems kinda low no?

It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.
thats what I was thinking...those numbers are definitley nice, but for your setup I'd think you'd see higher numbers
Its a 532 and it made 617 crank HP. It made over 1 HP per cubic inch.

Posted by Fostang (Member # 3752) on :

Great torque and quick as would be expected from a bb [Smile]

Posted by Camara90 (Member # 134) on :

Car lookd fucking sick. Nice Job on the build [patriot]

Posted by 92stangLX (Member # 3252) on :

WOW [Eek!]

The car turned out great.. post some more pics [patriot]

Posted by 8stang8 (Member # 8082) on :

Nice #s!

What kinda carb you running? Did you play with the jetting or just baseline?

Posted by Pure Stang (Member # 7251) on :

seems like it running just a little rich. there may be some stuff left on the table. but is a safe tune

Posted by Yellow94GT (Member # 431) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Pure Stang:
seems like it running just a little rich. there may be some stuff left on the table. but is a safe tune

It isn't running rich. Ignore that "11.2 A/F" window. That is a measurement of the richest point on the graph. For Dana's car that little rich spot only happens right went transitioning to WOT then quickly recovers to the mid 12's where it stays the rest of the pull. [burnout]

Posted by Yellow94GT (Member # 431) on :

quote:
Originally posted by 8stang8:
Nice #s!

What kinda carb you running? Did you play with the jetting or just baseline?

We had to change the jetting. The baseline pull was in the lower 11:1 A/F range. [patriot]

Posted by trottin4.6 (Member # 8597) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
I count rwhp not flywheel hp and there Are plenty of 302's making more than 1 rwhp on this board alone.

quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:

quote:
Originally posted by SydeWaySix:

quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
Seems kinda low no?

It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.
thats what I was thinking...those numbers are definitley nice, but for your setup I'd think you'd see higher numbers
Its a 532 and it made 617 crank HP. It made over 1 HP per cubic inch.

there was another fastback with a sbf on that same dyno 6 weeks ago that made over 1.1 RWHP per cubic inch at 11:5 to 1 through an auto. ask shaun about it, he did that motor. [worship]

Posted by fstryde3 (Member # 8436) on :

Sweet

Posted by Fostang (Member # 3752) on :

I think your talking about my homies red fastback.

quote:
Originally posted by trottin4.6:

quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
I count rwhp not flywheel hp and there Are plenty of 302's making more than 1 rwhp on this board alone.

quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:

quote:
Originally posted by SydeWaySix:

quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
Seems kinda low no?

It's not even 1 hp per cubic inch.
thats what I was thinking...those numbers are definitley nice, but for your setup I'd think you'd see higher numbers
Its a 532 and it made 617 crank HP. It made over 1 HP per cubic inch.
there was another fastback with a sbf on that same dyno 6 weeks ago that made over 1.1 RWHP per cubic inch at 11:5 to 1 through an auto. ask shaun about it, he did that motor.

Posted by sic70stang (Member # 4347) on :

Jesus this is outta control. respect the numbers and quit talking about Joe blows small block that did one HP per who gives a fuck.

Posted by SmokinLX (Member # 1684) on :

Nice job Dana!

Posted by Pure Stang (Member # 7251) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Yellow94GT:

quote:
Originally posted by Pure Stang:
seems like it running just a little rich. there may be some stuff left on the table. but is a safe tune
It isn't running rich. Ignore that "11.2 A/F" window. That is a measurement of the richest point on the graph. For Dana's car that little rich spot only happens right went transitioning to WOT then quickly recovers to the mid 12's where it stays the rest of the pull.

Oh i see cool stuff. [patriot]

Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on :

Thanks everyone. Just did the math my 532 is making 1.15hp per cubic inch.

Posted by 50 Deep (Member # 6216) on :

Does your family make good Salsbury steak? [Razz]

Nice numbers though man. Not sure how people think 500+ rear wheel is low. Seems like a lot to me. There's always some other combo that will be higher, but what your making now is a shit ton.

Always somebody faster, but very very few that are cleaner [patriot]

Posted by 8stang8 (Member # 8082) on :

Now you have no excuse to enjoy it at the track... [Razz]

Posted by 50Deep_jocks_03/04_Cobras (Member # 5888) on :

quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
Thanks everyone. Just did the math my 532 is making 1.15hp per cubic inch.

possibly at the crank, not at the wheels...

you can't be 100% sure what it's making at the crank unless you yank the motor and put it on an engine dyno....

however, with that being said. 500+RW on motor is nothing to seize at and I bet it's super reliable and pretty can do a 7,000 mile round trip with no issues....

Posted by svfreerider87 (Member # 5748) on :

Isn't this motor brand new? i would expect those numbers to increase with some more break in, never the less good numbers, nothing pulls like a stroked big block.

Posted by hidnn.o.s. (Member # 1219) on :

Congrats, I'm sure best of all you gained fantastic drivability with the power. Wondering though, weren't you always told of much higher RWHP? I thought you'd sworn from the combo you were told of upwards of 600+ "RW" hp?

Posted by wilit (Member # 3367) on :

That's pretty awesome. My buddy has a '71 Camaro with a YSi supercharger on a 454 and makes 550rwhp. For an NA build, that's pretty respectable.

Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on :

The guy that made my headers told me the motor would make 607hp. Hes big into big block Ford racing so he was pretty dead on. The guy that put the shortblock together told me it will handle 750+hp. I was hoping for over 600RWHP. That would have been cool.

Putting it in the garage this morning cause we got home late last night so i left it on the trailer it acted like it was easier to drive. I am actually gonna go cruise it right now so i'll let you guys know how she drives.

Posted by iceman302 (Member # 7180) on :

Damn nice numbers, Dana! You can't beat that plateau of torque from a big block!

Posted by 71MercGT (Member # 4305) on :

Congratulations Man, I watched your build close and like it. The Comet I've married myself to will eventually show up on here but i'm internet shy. Until than, im still bugging AED to do a dyno tune for me at their old Santa Clara location......!

Posted by EPIK (Member # 7481) on :

Congrats on the numbers Dana!!!

I can't believe people are thinking those numbers are low???

I don't know much about big blocks, but I know the Chevy 572 Crate motor is only rated at 620hp/650tq at the crank, that would equal out to about the same rwhp as your car.

[ August 18, 2010, 08:25 PM: Message edited by: EPIK ]

Posted by Duncan Motors (Member # 7045) on :

im not knockin it at all , and i dont remember seein your cam spects but just listen to the motor lopin i wouldn't think the power would die off so soon. but awesome car no matter what.

Posted by JohnCM (Member # 1076) on :

thats a bad ass car Dana, super clean fastback with 500 plus RWHP is awesome [patriot]

Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on :

Just drove it around downtown and it drives like a dream. Hella better than it did. Got in it and its fast [worship]

Posted by fasthatch (Member # 7277) on :

is your carb out of the box deal

Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on :

quote:
Originally posted by fasthatch:
is your carb out of the box deal

No it was tuned at AED.

Posted by fasthatch (Member # 7277) on :

quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:

quote:
Originally posted by fasthatch:
is your carb out of the box deal
No it was tuned at AED.

tuned do you mean just a jet change or did the rework it

Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on :

quote:
Originally posted by fasthatch:

quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:

quote:
Originally posted by fasthatch:
is your carb out of the box deal
No it was tuned at AED.
tuned do you mean just a jet change or did the rework it

they put jets in it, adjusted the idle air mixture, and the other screws on the side of the carb.

Posted by hidnn.o.s. (Member # 1219) on :

quote:
Originally posted by EPIK:
I don't know much about big blocks, but I know the Chevy 572 Crate motor is only rated at 620hp/650tq at the crank, that would equal out to about the same rwhp as your car.

Shouldn't ever compare a crate motor to a matched combo. Crate motors are "the best available" by any means in most cases.

Posted by NavidR (Member # 3164) on :

good numbers

Posted by fasthatch (Member # 7277) on :

quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:

quote:
Originally posted by fasthatch:

quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:

quote:
Originally posted by fasthatch:
is your carb out of the box deal
No it was tuned at AED.
tuned do you mean just a jet change or did the rework it
they put jets in it, adjusted the idle air mixture, and the other screws on the side of the carb.

you should talk to csu about getting your carb done up for your combo it real will wake that big block up

Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on :

What more could be done to my carb that hasn't been done already?

[ August 19, 2010, 12:30 AM: Message edited by: WildFire532FB ]

Posted by fasthatch (Member # 7277) on :

quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
What more could be done to my carb that hasn't been done already?

there alot that can be done to your carb google csu carbs an call them up you will be real happy you did

Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on :

Nice numbers Dana wouldnt mind those numbers at all

Posted by happygmore (Member # 7159) on :

you should post them #s on 1320.......they might be able to help ya gain about 200hp

Posted by trottin4.6 (Member # 8597) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
I think your talking about my homies red fastback.

i dont know the guy with that car, i just know from talking to 93pony about the other car and this car.

bbf making that little power through a stick vs. (for example) drew's 347 that made 460+. common sense tells you which one is impressive and which one well...isn't very.

quote:
Originally posted by happygmore:
[QB] you should post them #s on 1320.......they might be able to help ya gain about 200hp

he might also want to try yellowbullet. there is a lot more to carb tuning than jets, airbleeds, and "those screws on the side of the carb" hahaha.

Posted by STREETFIGHTER50 (Member # 2973) on :

quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
On a side note, at 2200rpm it made 480ft/lbs of torque at the wheels.

Damn 480 ft.-lbs @ 2200 RPM!? [Eek!]

Nice build Dana. Straight up torque monster u got there!

Posted by fasthatch (Member # 7277) on :

quote:
Originally posted by trottin4.6:

quote:
Originally posted by Fostang:
I think your talking about my homies red fastback.
i dont know the guy with that car, i just know from talking to 93pony about the other car and this car.

bbf making that little power through a stick vs. (for example) drew's 347 that made 460+. common sense tells you which one is impressive and which one well...isn't very.

quote:
Originally posted by happygmore:
[QB] you should post them #s on 1320.......they might be able to help ya gain about 200hp
he might also want to try yellowbullet. there is a lot more to carb tuning than jets, airbleeds, and "those screws on the side of the carb" hahaha.

i don't think dana the yellowbullet type

Posted by SIC9250 (Member # 8216) on :

Congrats on your numbers..very respectable no joke...Now its time to come to the track and see what that big block throws down in the 1320 department [Big Grin]

. And when u do shoot me a pm so I can have the 427fb come out [burnout]

Posted by SlowStockFox (Member # 1081) on :

i also must say dana that thing is freaking sick. i think it makes good power. as johncm said a fast back clean as can be with 500 plus is a bad ass ride. congrats. about the carb thing i know there is alot that can be done besides jets. maybe you should look into it. all in all BAD FUCKING ASS [patriot]

Posted by wilit (Member # 3367) on :

quote:
Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.:

quote:
Originally posted by EPIK:
I don't know much about big blocks, but I know the Chevy 572 Crate motor is only rated at 620hp/650tq at the crank, that would equal out to about the same rwhp as your car.
Shouldn't ever compare a crate motor to a matched combo. Crate motors are "the best available" by any means in most cases.

I think that's a very good comparison. Everyone is saying Dana's numbers are low for a 532ci motor, but it makes the same as Chevy's top of the line 572ci crate motor. To put together a combo yourself that makes just as much power as "the best available" from the competition, that's pretty good in my book.

Posted by svfreerider87 (Member # 5748) on :

quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
What more could be done to my carb that hasn't been done already?

there are some triiick high performance cabrs to be had, my buddy has a a pro form equipped holley carb, that he had a carb shop tune specifically for his stroked big block (468 pontiac) and last dyno slip he had was makin right around 600 at the tires, through a turbo 400 and ford 9 inch. just something you may want to look into.

Posted by Fox Lightning (Member # 7658) on :

Nice numbers bro.

wow 480ft lbs torque @ 2200 rpm [Eek!]

Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com