|
Author
|
Topic: Horsepower Gains?
|
Mean 5.0
¯
Member # 9822
|
posted
 
 
Anyone wanna take some guesses?
Ive got a 331, AFR 185 heads, Holley Systemax Intake, 30lb Injectors, Ford Racing Z cam, Shorty Headers, and i made 343rwhp & 353 rwtq
Wayne (Waynes Dyno,Jacksonville NC) just put in a Comp Cams XE282HR and put my long tubes on and is tuning it, hasnt been on the dyno yet since the mods, but anyone wanna take some guesses as to what its gonna make for power? I would like to see the 400 mark, but thats being a bit optomistic i think. Im also throwing a 100 shot at it, so we'll see how that turns out too!!
Hoping for mid 11's on motor and maybe some high 10s on spray!
I'll update when he dyno's it.
Posts: 93 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Mar 2010
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
367hp and 340tq I say down on torque with the comp versus the z cam
--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?
I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by turbo50:
367hp and 340tq I say down on torque with the comp versus the z cam
Gotta agree... You will be more than 30rwhp off from 400rwhp.
You want 400rw, give Hi-Tech a ring and let them get creative with the cam, and you will get close imho.
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
Mean 5.0
¯
Member # 9822
|
posted
You really think im gonna lose that much tq going with the comp cam? I would be happy with 370rwhp though, suprised at the tq loss though...I'll let you know how it turns out...
Posts: 93 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Mar 2010
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Mean 5.0:
You really think im gonna lose that much tq going with the comp cam? I would be happy with 370rwhp though, suprised at the tq loss though...I'll let you know how it turns out...
Looks like its running pretty good to begin with and to be honest I am suprised you didnt go with a custom cam since you are changing the cam and I think that comp is like $280 and hi tech can do you for about $320 to your door? Maybe it was a freebie or something and I am NOT knockin you just sharin my thoughts on this.
--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?
I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
Mean 5.0
¯
Member # 9822
|
posted
Military discount, thats the main reason i went with Comp, i dont want to go custom grind yet, im saving my money for a new block and a turbo setup, i'll spend the money on a custom grind then...thanks for the opinions, im not easily offended so no worries...
Posts: 93 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Mar 2010
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Mean 5.0:
Military discount, thats the main reason i went with Comp, i dont want to go custom grind yet, im saving my money for a new block and a turbo setup, i'll spend the money on a custom grind then...thanks for the opinions, im not easily offended so no worries...
New block and turbo setup FTW..............
--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?
I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
Mean 5.0
¯
Member # 9822
|
posted
What setup are you running Turbo 50? Turbo kit or custom setup?
Posts: 93 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Mar 2010
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Mean 5.0:
What setup are you running Turbo 50? Turbo kit or custom setup?
im playin with my harley dont have a mustang right now and going to avoid it all together if i can resist the dope fiend like urge
--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?
I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
Mean 5.0
¯
Member # 9822
|
posted
So you dont have a Turbo 5.0? How misleading... ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
You wont be able to resist...come back to the dark side...
Here's my opinion on Harley's
Harley Davidson: The worlds' most efficient method of turning gasoline into noise without the harmful side effect of horsepower.
Just bustin yer chops dude, nothing personal ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Posts: 93 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Mar 2010
| :
|
|
turbo50
¯
Member # 6700
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Mean 5.0:
So you dont have a Turbo 5.0? How misleading...
You wont be able to resist...come back to the dark side...
Here's my opinion on Harley's
Harley Davidson: The worlds' most efficient method of turning gasoline into noise without the harmful side effect of horsepower.
Just bustin yer chops dude, nothing personal
i built a rep on my screen name, not gonna change it and when i did have my turbo mustang it was a turbocharged 6.0l ls motor to be honest.
i also used to have the same train of thought with regards to harleys until i rode one with my lil wife on the back, now im hooked.
ur right i will be back too and when i come back itll be with 400 plus inches and a turbo in my next foxbody.
good luck with yours i had a very similar setup back in 2000, 2001 on the bottle
--------------------
.........when was the last time YOU built something with YOUR own hands?
I offer quality sidework at reasonable prices. PM ME
Posts: 7606 | From: Discovery Bay, California | Registered: Apr 2006
| :
|
|
Mean 5.0
¯
Member # 9822
|
posted
I hear ya bro, a rider is a rider, i just tend to pick on harleys with my bike, its a v-twin too, just a little faster
I hope to be rocking a turbo setup in the next 5 years or so, gotta save up and once i get out of the Corps get a good job!
Posts: 93 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Mar 2010
| :
|
|
Mean 5.0
¯
Member # 9822
|
posted
357RWHP & 366 RWTQ on motor
432 RWHP & 495 RWHP on nitrous
Not what i was hoping for on motor, but not too shabby on the spray!!!!
Posts: 93 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Mar 2010
| :
|
|
Pure Stang
¯
Member # 7251
|
posted
not bad. nice numbers on the nitrous ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
HEART BREAKER
R.I.P Willie Guzman (5ltrsvt) you will be missed brother.
04/24/87 - 11/23/2012
90 lx 347 RIP
86 gt
89 lx- next project
Posts: 6497 | From: San Jose | Registered: Nov 2006
| :
|
|
Mean 5.0
¯
Member # 9822
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Pure Stang:
not bad. nice numbers on the nitrous
Yeah, i was pleased with the nitrous numbers! Would have liked to have seen more on motor, but not bad.
Curious now what a 150 shot would do as that was only a 100 shot...
Posts: 93 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Mar 2010
| :
|
|
Mean 5.0
¯
Member # 9822
|
posted
Got the dyno sheet
Its a conservative tune on nitrous being as its my first time running on spray.
Posts: 93 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Mar 2010
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
I'm gooood ![[Wink]](wink.gif)
--------------------
Stangless
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
