|
Author
|
Topic: 2010 SHO ????
|
Interceptor Eliminator
¯
Member # 9663
|
posted
 
 
I watchd a show they compared it to a buncha stuff and it was kikn butt anythoughts any1 ?
--------------------
1990 LX Hatch50 4SALE
1996 Mustang GT
2003 Mustang Mach1
2004 Mustang Cobra
1994 F250 460 4x4
Posts: 42 | From: Sacramento Ca | Registered: Dec 2009
| :
|
|
90fox5.0
¯
Member # 9338
|
posted
I saw it on speed and it looked bad ass.
--------------------
1989 LX DROP
1997 Svt Cobra (SOLD)
2000 SS Camaro (SOLD)
Posts: 1827 | From: South sacramento | Registered: Jul 2009
| :
|
|
SHOalex
¯
Member # 7720
|
posted
Pretty bad ass of you ask me lol
--------------------
BAM! POW! Right in the kisser.
Posts: 1448 | From: Oakland | Registered: Jun 2007
| :
|
|
Interceptor Eliminator
¯
Member # 9663
|
posted
haha yes im going to check 1 out today. i figure if i sale all my rolling stock i could buy 1 lol
--------------------
1990 LX Hatch50 4SALE
1996 Mustang GT
2003 Mustang Mach1
2004 Mustang Cobra
1994 F250 460 4x4
Posts: 42 | From: Sacramento Ca | Registered: Dec 2009
| :
|
|
iceman302
¯
Member # 7180
|
posted
Its definitely a high tech, luxurious performance sedan BUT its not a sports sedan. I'm not sure what you're looking for but its a heavy car, a FWD platform, the brakes are undersized, and its automatic only. I also think its a bit overpriced.
[ March 25, 2010, 09:54 PM: Message edited by: iceman302 ]
--------------------
'65 Mustang Fastback
Posts: 4171 | From: Rancho Murieta | Registered: Oct 2006
| :
|
|
SHOalex
¯
Member # 7720
|
posted
Yea I also think it's over priced if I had the money I'd wait a couple years to get one used, ohh and also if you think it's not a performance car look at the video of an sho running a 12.75 on nothing but a tune and I belive the cars are AWD not front
[ March 26, 2010, 01:00 AM: Message edited by: SHOalex ]
--------------------
BAM! POW! Right in the kisser.
Posts: 1448 | From: Oakland | Registered: Jun 2007
| :
|
|
Interceptor Eliminator
¯
Member # 9663
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by iceman302:
Its definitely a high tech, luxurious performance sedan BUT its not a sports sedan. I'm not sure what you're looking for but its a heavy car, a FWD platform, the brakes are undersized, and its automatic only. I also think its a bit overpriced.
4-door sedan AWD
Engine 3.5 liter direct-injected twin-turbo EcoBoost V6 producing 365 hp at 5500 rpm and 350 lb·ft of torque at 3500 RPM
Transmission 6-speed 6F55-automatic
Wheelbase 112.9 in
Length 202.9 in
Width 76.9 in
Height 60.7 in
Curb weight 4,388 lb
he new SHO comes with Ford's new SR1 suspension setup with MacPherson front struts and a multi-link design in the rear. This includes SHO-specific shock absorbers, springs, stabilizer bars and strut mount bushings. An optional Performance Package offers better brake pads, recalibrated steering, a "Sport Mode" for the stability control and shorter 3.16 to 1 final drive ratio.
--------------------
1990 LX Hatch50 4SALE
1996 Mustang GT
2003 Mustang Mach1
2004 Mustang Cobra
1994 F250 460 4x4
Posts: 42 | From: Sacramento Ca | Registered: Dec 2009
| :
|
|
Interceptor Eliminator
¯
Member # 9663
|
posted
its a great car i drove 1 today and it felt tighter n the corners than my bestfriends 09 challenger rt it didnt have that fun factor of a rwd v-8 loved the nifty stuff inside and everything was in reach and easy to read. only complaint is the climate controls but i gues its cuz im easily confused. its quite but got a mean growl when u open the taps
--------------------
1990 LX Hatch50 4SALE
1996 Mustang GT
2003 Mustang Mach1
2004 Mustang Cobra
1994 F250 460 4x4
Posts: 42 | From: Sacramento Ca | Registered: Dec 2009
| :
|
|
iceman302
¯
Member # 7180
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by SHOalex:
Yea I also think it's over priced if I had the money I'd wait a couple years to get one used, ohh and also if you think it's not a performance car look at the video of an sho running a 12.75 on nothing but a tune and I belive the cars are AWD not front
I said that it is a FWD platform. Yes, the cars are all AWD but they have a ton of weight forward in the chassis since the base models are all FWD. The reviews I've read have all confirmed that the car is more of a performance oriented sedan, minus the "sport"... prone to understeer and body roll with brakes that tend to fade.
I have seen the video of the tuned SHO running 12.75 but I just feel there isn't a ton of upside from there without significant mods... especially the tranny.
--------------------
'65 Mustang Fastback
Posts: 4171 | From: Rancho Murieta | Registered: Oct 2006
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
