chick gets owned on facebook - Northern California Ford Owners

This is topic chick gets owned on facebook in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners .

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=037550

Posted by shiftylx (Member # 2670) on :

Posted by 510svt (Member # 8705) on :

HAHA she got BURNED!

Posted by N93EXCHP (Member # 8741) on :

Ouch that one hurt even I felt the burn on that one [Eek!]

Posted by 90FoX (Member # 1974) on :

Oh shit...haha dumb broad! [worship]

She can't even do simple tasks correctly haha

Who calls anyone a "wanker"? lmao

Posted by Bigjerry916 (Member # 8787) on :

Jesus

Posted by SheerSliver03 (Member # 6589) on :

i think that is a little out of line for a boss to publicly respond like that. but the girl is still a tard

Posted by CALIFORNIAGT (Member # 7845) on :

hahahahahahahaha damn! retarded ass bitch! lol

Posted by SVTRM8R (Member # 5977) on :

Hahahahahaha... That is great...

Posted by Jdub07 (Member # 2728) on :

who add's their boss to facebook? she should be fired just for doing that

Posted by AbominableSnoman... (Member # 8290) on :

owned

Posted by kingroy (Member # 7736) on :

I don't believe this. Fisrt, I highly doubt it's legal to fire someone on a social network. Second, I doubt that the boss has the power to fire someone on the spot unless it was a small business and he was the owner. Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st. Lastly, who cares what someone has to say about their boss online. And if she got fired for calling her boss a "wanker" on a social network, then that'll be a violation of her freedom of speech.

Sorry for the buzz kill. But I call BS on this one.

Posted by hidnn.o.s. (Member # 1219) on :

quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st.

BULLSHIT, not in their 6 month trial, if that's what's in their contract when hired, which is common.

Posted by xvt's 85 5.0 (Member # 4765) on :

quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
I don't believe this. Fisrt, I highly doubt it's legal to fire someone on a social network. Second, I doubt that the boss has the power to fire someone on the spot unless it was a small business and he was the owner. Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st. Lastly, who cares what someone has to say about their boss online. And if she got fired for calling her boss a "wanker" on a social network, then that'll be a violation of her freedom of speech.

Sorry for the buzz kill. But I call BS on this one.

FYI facebook is not limited to the USA

Posted by kingroy (Member # 7736) on :

quote:
Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.:

quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st.
BULLSHIT, not in their 6 month trial, if that's what's in their contract when hired, which is common.

Still have to go through HR, unless he is the owner. Yes, it's a whole lot easier to fire someone under probation, but the fact remains the same. The boss has to go through HR 1st.

Posted by asskickn88 (Member # 4957) on :

This appears to be in England or somewhere over there and so you never know how the laws are written or applied. The way she posted it looks just like one of those stupid little girls that are better than everyone else, I had an EX that acted just like that.

Posted by SPTVENM (Member # 7080) on :

bwahahah dumb biatch she got got

[ August 11, 2009, 01:56 PM: Message edited by: SPTVENM ]

Posted by kingroy (Member # 7736) on :

quote:
Originally posted by xvt's 85 5.0:

quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
I don't believe this. Fisrt, I highly doubt it's legal to fire someone on a social network. Second, I doubt that the boss has the power to fire someone on the spot unless it was a small business and he was the owner. Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st. Lastly, who cares what someone has to say about their boss online. And if she got fired for calling her boss a "wanker" on a social network, then that'll be a violation of her freedom of speech.

Sorry for the buzz kill. But I call BS on this one.
FYI facebook is not limited to the USA

You're right. and cafords is not limited to california

Posted by hidnn.o.s. (Member # 1219) on :

quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:

quote:
Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.:

quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st.
BULLSHIT, not in their 6 month trial, if that's what's in their contract when hired, which is common.
Still have to go through HR, unless he is the owner. Yes, it's a whole lot easier to fire someone under probation, but the fact remains the same. The boss has to go through HR 1st.

WRONG!

Posted by N8 (Member # 6048) on :

kinda reminds me of the time, I was in a webEx meeting and the presenter shared his desktop rather than shared his program. And we saw all the shit he was talking over instant messenger about a co-worker that was on the webEx meeting. It was the most uncomfortable meeting ever. I mean he ripped for about a good 10 minutes while in this meeting. Finally someone said "Erm John, we can see what you are writing". It was eery silence then a pink slip after that.

Posted by N8 (Member # 6048) on :

quote:
Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.:

quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:

quote:
Originally posted by hidnn.o.s.:

quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st.
BULLSHIT, not in their 6 month trial, if that's what's in their contract when hired, which is common.
Still have to go through HR, unless he is the owner. Yes, it's a whole lot easier to fire someone under probation, but the fact remains the same. The boss has to go through HR 1st.
WRONG!

RIGHT (well in most corporate cases). Also depends on if the employee is a employee versus a contractor. And unless it was witnessed typed by the individual that firing would not stand up in court. As she can say her account was compromised. I have seen this happen before.

Posted by xvt's 85 5.0 (Member # 4765) on :

quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:

quote:
Originally posted by xvt's 85 5.0:

quote:
Originally posted by kingroy:
I don't believe this. Fisrt, I highly doubt it's legal to fire someone on a social network. Second, I doubt that the boss has the power to fire someone on the spot unless it was a small business and he was the owner. Employment terminations have to go through HR 1st. Lastly, who cares what someone has to say about their boss online. And if she got fired for calling her boss a "wanker" on a social network, then that'll be a violation of her freedom of speech.

Sorry for the buzz kill. But I call BS on this one.
FYI facebook is not limited to the USA
You're right. and cafords is not limited to california

FYI is in the UK

Posted by SPIDER_STANG (Member # 8658) on :

LoL [Eek!]

Posted by Ham'n Eggs (Member # 8967) on :

I call [BS flag]

on this. What you say or do on your OWN time is your business. Cannot be fired or dismissed for that.

Posted by liftedF150 (Member # 868) on :

depends on what or if they had a handbook and what was written in that book. If she is defacing the company then they may have just cause for termination but to me it all seems like a nice little internet spoof. I watch what i say on facebook because my boss is on there as well as coworkers...

Posted by LETHL 03 (Member # 5401) on :

quote:
Originally posted by shiftylx:

ooops! lol [worship]

Posted by v-town coupe (Member # 2771) on :

[Big Grin]

That is FUNNY!

[ August 14, 2009, 01:02 AM: Message edited by: v-town coupe ]

Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com