|
Author
|
Topic: 2010 SS specs
|
NorCalRydaz
¯
Member # 3233
|
posted
 
 
Any one have the 2010 SS camaro specs? 1/4 mile time?
Posts: 2963 | From: San Jo | Registered: Sep 2003
| :
|
|
Black 02 SS
¯
Member # 5939
|
posted
Has the LS3 6.2L motor with 426/420 for the 6 speed manual and 400/410 for the 6 speed auto. Its heavier than the 4th gen weighing in at 3860 for the 6 speed. So far magazines are advertising 1/4 times in the low-mid 13s but the trap speed is there for a 12 sec time so we'll see what people do out at tracks soon. There is a company who added an intake and long tubes with cats and a catback and made 400 rwhp with only those mods.
--------------------
Schwinn 18speed
Posts: 949 | From: East Bay | Registered: Aug 2005
| :
|
|
Captain Obvious
¯
Member # 7842
|
posted
yea the new camaro has a good motor but it also has a 2ton heavy body. a stock fox coupe with good gearing would probly keep up with that pig tank.
--------------------
It's NOT illegal. It's just frowned upon, like masturbating on an airplane.
Posts: 1976 | Registered: Aug 2007
| :
|
|
Gnari-Garage
CAFords OG
Member # 3164
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 91fox:
yea the new camaro has a good motor but it also has a 2ton heavy body. a stock fox coupe with good gearing would probly keep up with that pig tank.
ya and a twin turbo 5.0 is faster than a stock lamborghini also but hey I would still take the lambo ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif) . So my point is the newer SS might be heavy and slower than we like them but its a sick ass car and you can't compare it to a fox coupe! Its not always about what is faster!
--------------------
2017 McLaren 570GT
2019 Audi S5
2017 Tundra 7" Lift, 37" Tires
Posts: 4017 | From: 916-sacramento | Registered: Aug 2003
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by NavidR:
quote:
Originally posted by 91fox:
yea the new camaro has a good motor but it also has a 2ton heavy body. a stock fox coupe with good gearing would probly keep up with that pig tank.
ya and a twin turbo 5.0 is faster than a stock lamborghini also but hey I would still take the lambo . So my point is the newer SS might be heavy and slower than we like them but its a sick ass car and you can't compare it to a fox coupe! Its not always about what is faster!
I agree about its not always about whats faster, if it was I wouldnt own a Mach 1. But everyone always bashes Ford for only have 315 horses in the New stangs, while the Camaro's are 400+, but since the Maro is so much heavier, the stang should give it a good run.... The mustang GT's curb weight is advertised as 3,533, while the Camaro SS is advertised at 3,750!!!!
On another note though, I think the new Camaro & the 2010 stang are both ugly as hell... The Challenger on the other hand is sexy as hell.....
[ May 12, 2009, 12:53 AM: Message edited by: EPIK ]
--------------------
=91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction**
=05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
Captain Obvious
¯
Member # 7842
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by NavidR:
quote:
Originally posted by 91fox:
yea the new camaro has a good motor but it also has a 2ton heavy body. a stock fox coupe with good gearing would probly keep up with that pig tank.
ya and a twin turbo 5.0 is faster than a stock lamborghini also but hey I would still take the lambo . So my point is the newer SS might be heavy and slower than we like them but its a sick ass car and you can't compare it to a fox coupe! Its not always about what is faster!
ok get the camaro because its one of those mid life crisis type buys and not because its an ass kicking car.
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
--------------------
It's NOT illegal. It's just frowned upon, like masturbating on an airplane.
Posts: 1976 | Registered: Aug 2007
| :
|
|
j0eyabs
¯
Member # 1026
|
posted
well at least the Mustang will be around in 2 years. Can't say that the Challenger and Camaro will be around the way things are going.
Posts: 767 | From: California | Registered: Mar 2002
| :
|
|
SFvert
Drama kids have no place here
Member # 3965
|
posted
the car just looks bloated and heavy ![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
--------------------
R.I.P. 89 LX Sold the 90 Vert,
I bring the Amber Lamps!!!
[IMG]http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/5/53/Epicbeardmanwin.jpg[/IMG]
Posts: 3706 | From: the city by the bay | Registered: Jan 2004
| :
|
|
510_SVT
¯
Member # 8705
|
posted
I checked out the yellow one they had in san leandro. It doesn't look that bulky up front as much as they say it does. It was a v6 model n they were asking lik 35k!! It might have 300hp but it still sounds lik a v6
--------------------
/96 Cobra/
//87' LX h.c.i//
Posts: 1306 | From: 510EastBay | Registered: Oct 2008
| :
|
|
87droptop50
Go Giants!
Member # 7185
|
posted
35k for a v6 .shit my cusin got his 09 challenger srt8 for 44 out the door
--------------------
HighSpeed Motorsports
87Mustang Gt Conv kurgan tuned
03Harley F150 #5023
69El Camino SS396 -sold
99 f350 7.3 DRW
Posts: 3855 | From: SF | Registered: Oct 2006
| :
|
|
88DroptopGT
¯
Member # 2535
|
posted
I still dont get why these new "muscle" cars have so much "fat" on them.
Overpriced garbage IMO.
Posts: 3978 | From: 707 | Registered: Mar 2003
| :
|
|
510_SVT
¯
Member # 8705
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 87droptop50:
35k for a v6 .shit my cusin got his 09 challenger srt8 for 44 out the door
Yeah I rather get the challenger but I dnt think it was sticker price just the dealer price. The guy said thers only 3 in the whole bayarea rite now
--------------------
/96 Cobra/
//87' LX h.c.i//
Posts: 1306 | From: 510EastBay | Registered: Oct 2008
| :
|
|
Ryan_LX
¯
Member # 7089
|
posted
How much is the sticker on a new ss? More then a terminator or a mach 1 that's fer sure
--------------------
Jesus is king!
Posts: 1718 | From: no where | Registered: Sep 2006
| :
|
|
asskickn88
¯
Member # 4957
|
posted
Here's an interesting read..... web page
--------------------
Three 540 Bimmers and a 5.0 Explorer.... got a Ford back in the stable!
It's time for the country to do what Obama's own father did.
Abandon him.
Posts: 6069 | From: Rocklin, Ca | Registered: Oct 2004
| :
|
|
Captain Obvious
¯
Member # 7842
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by asskickn88:
Here's an interesting read..... web page
hey 50+ years of piece of shit cars will do it to you
Posts: 1976 | Registered: Aug 2007
| :
|
|
94 N.C.F GT
TEAM PLATINUM
Member # 8722
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 88DroptopGT:
I still dont get why these new "muscle" cars have so much "fat" on them.
Overpriced garbage IMO.
because there trying to bring back the old school look of the older cars
--------------------
TEAM PLATINUM
87LX:(D D) ORANGE coupe
94GT:(427) Its a BEAST on the streets but in the garage it stays ASLEEP. N/A
Posts: 1313 | From: RICHMOND/sanpablo | Registered: Oct 2008
| :
|
|
94 N.C.F GT
TEAM PLATINUM
Member # 8722
|
posted
if i was GM i would be saleing these cars cheap so they could go like hot cakes fast fast fast alot more people would be buying ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
TEAM PLATINUM
87LX:(D D) ORANGE coupe
94GT:(427) Its a BEAST on the streets but in the garage it stays ASLEEP. N/A
Posts: 1313 | From: RICHMOND/sanpablo | Registered: Oct 2008
| :
|
|
iceman302
¯
Member # 7180
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 88DroptopGT:
I still dont get why these new "muscle" cars have so much "fat" on them.
Overpriced garbage IMO.
Safety regulations and trying to build them to a price point. Lightweight, exotic materials carry a hefty price so the save that stuff for the big money cars.
--------------------
'65 Mustang Fastback
Posts: 4171 | From: Rancho Murieta | Registered: Oct 2006
| :
|
|
Mr.Lucky
CAFords OG
Member # 1772
|
posted
i think it looks nice, ive seen a few in person... sorry but ill still take a used Z06. jmo
--------------------
95GT: Bolt ons.
Good sellers/buyers: Stangs R Us, 1SicGt, sn4bwc, racsirx, WickedStang, Autumnstang97, cali95gt
Posts: 4197 | From: Manteca | Registered: Sep 2002
| :
|
|
1994steeda
¯
Member # 6127
|
posted
i seen every magazine compare this to the new gt mustang but they should put the ss vs the gt500 its only fair...
--------------------
I don't buy STOLEN mustang parts...
00 C5 Corvette
94 Gt stolen
94 Gt Stolen
95 GT sold
95 Gt Sold
97 Cobra sold
98 Gt sold
01 Bullitt sold
Posts: 1555 | From: San Jose | Registered: Oct 2005
| :
|
|
NorCalRydaz
¯
Member # 3233
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Black 02 SS:
Has the LS3 6.2L motor with 426/420 for the 6 speed manual and 400/410 for the 6 speed auto. Its heavier than the 4th gen weighing in at 3860 for the 6 speed. So far magazines are advertising 1/4 times in the low-mid 13s but the trap speed is there for a 12 sec time so we'll see what people do out at tracks soon. There is a company who added an intake and long tubes with cats and a catback and made 400 rwhp with only those mods.
good info.
Posts: 2963 | From: San Jo | Registered: Sep 2003
| :
|
|
JOEFOX87
¯
Member # 8331
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 1994steeda:
i seen every magazine compare this to the new gt mustang but they should put the ss vs the gt500 its only fair...
I love for them to compare, cause even though them two cars have more horsepower, the performance is not that impressive. And of course, does not provide your bang for the buck that the Mustang provide. I would love to see a mustang with the same horsepower numbers of it's competitors. What a different battle that would be. ![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
Posts: 824 | From: Union City, California | Registered: Apr 2008
| :
|
|
iceman302
¯
Member # 7180
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by JOEFOX87:
quote:
Originally posted by 1994steeda:
i seen every magazine compare this to the new gt mustang but they should put the ss vs the gt500 its only fair...
I love for them to compare, cause even though them two cars have more horsepower, the performance is not that impressive. And of course, does not provide your bang for the buck that the Mustang provide. I would love to see a mustang with the same horsepower numbers of it's competitors. What a different battle that would be.
I have read that there will be a special edition of the F-150 coming out next year called the Raptor. It will initially have the 5.4L but the new 6.2L "Boss" engine will be available after introduction. Wishful logic would say that its only a matter of time before it makes it into the Mustang somehow.
--------------------
'65 Mustang Fastback
Posts: 4171 | From: Rancho Murieta | Registered: Oct 2006
| :
|
|
Jessie P
¯
Member # 7073
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 91fox:
quote:
Originally posted by asskickn88:
Here's an interesting read..... web page
hey 50+ years of piece of shit cars will do it to you
LOL Wow
--------------------
Member of The Track Legion
Know Your Worth... Expect Nothing Less
Posts: 594 | From: Roseville, Ca. | Registered: Sep 2006
| :
|
|
Jessie P
¯
Member # 7073
|
posted
With safety regulations that the goverment is putting on all car makers today it doesn't exactly make it easy to produce a light muscle in todays day in age. However with that being said ALL car manufacters are suffering from a huge loss in overall revenue. However im not a huge fan of any of the new muscle cars of today. Yeah the price tag on the new Camaro is big, however a lot of that has to do with the dealer always marking things up some outragoues amount. In a couple years it will be a different story. People today have that " I need to keep up with the Jones" attitude by having the first one on the block. I'd say let them buy um, that way in a year or so they'll trade em in because they can't afford the car and that way an average guy like me can own one. Performance wise the Camaro is set up pretty solid. However for the price tag you can find used 05-07 Z06s for around the same price or even just a few dollars more.
--------------------
Member of The Track Legion
Know Your Worth... Expect Nothing Less
Posts: 594 | From: Roseville, Ca. | Registered: Sep 2006
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
