Author
|
Topic: New dyno tune results...
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
So I finally got my car dyno tuned after the new mods. The numbers were decent, but I must say I am a bit dissapointed. My car put down 303 rwhp & 320 rwtq with an a/f ratio of 12.4-12.9 across the board. I think the timing is set @ about 19 degrees. This was on a Dyno Dynamics machine....
My mods are... =Mac LT's =Mac o/r H pipe =Bassani catback =C&L 85mm maf =3/8" intake spacer
Do these #'s sound about right??
-------------------- =91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction** =05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
hidnn.o.s.
¯
Member # 1219
|
posted
A car like yours with your mods I'd "expect" 7-12 more. You're close though
-------------------- R.I.P. Willie G. You are missed on this forum
Posts: 15950 | Registered: Apr 2002
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
When I got my car dyno'ed with a catted H, catback, stock manifolds, C&L 85mm, & stock tune, it put down 287 rwhp & 292 ft lbs. It was also running extremely lean in the 13.5 range. With a crappy RWTD mail order tune & the same mods it put down 294rwhp & 311 rwtq with an even leaner a/f ratio of 13.5-13.9...
I guess if anything, the a/f ratio is finally correct & it feels like its running smoother & a bit stronger....
I guess people are right when they say that dyno's are dissapointing usually.... __________________ [ March 13, 2008, 11:49 PM: Message edited by: EPIK ]
-------------------- =91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction** =05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
BlowN67
¯
Member # 4229
|
posted
i know but somemight now ... What car arewetalking about now
-------------------- AIM gonein67 JOHN * californiafords.com * corral.net * foureyedpride.com * yellowbullet.com * theturboforums.com
Posts: 9809 | From: Home of LARD | Registered: Mar 2004
| :
|
|
88DroptopGT
¯
Member # 2535
|
posted
I think it needs a 100 shot and some sticky tires!
Posts: 3978 | From: 707 | Registered: Mar 2003
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
FFP's #'s are known to be all over the map. My TT put down a whapping 506RWHP on that dyno.....& ran 10.1 @134mph 2 weeks later with a raceweight of over 3650lbs.
That dyno has the capability of loading the car down significantly more or less than a dynojet. There's far more adjustment than most think....& yes, it most definately effects the tune (since it's tuned based on load tables) & #'s that it produces.
-------------------- www.advancedenginedevelopment.com SCT dealer Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4266 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 93PONY: FFP's #'s are known to be all over the map. My TT put down a whapping 506RWHP on that dyno.....& ran 10.1 @134mph 2 weeks later with a raceweight of over 3650lbs.
That dyno has the capability of loading the car down significantly more or less than a dynojet. There's far more adjustment than most think....& yes, it most definately effects the tune (since it's tuned based on load tables) & #'s that it produces.
Well honestly, I wanted AED to tune it, BUT, I didnt have 2 other cars that wanted tuning at the same time....As far as FFP's #s are concerned, another Mach with just an Electric water pump, o/r X, catback, K&N FIPK, & tune put down a whopping 318rwhp & 340rwtq on that same dyno....Seemed high, but who knows...Needless to say, that same Mach runs 12.4 on motor & all my friends who got there cars tuned there seem to run very strong??? [ March 14, 2008, 12:42 AM: Message edited by: EPIK ]
-------------------- =91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction** =05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
93 CHP
¯
Member # 8240
|
posted
yea i dont see why your car didn't dyno higher than that mach you were talking about but pretty decent numbers
Posts: 628 | From: Elk Grove | Registered: Feb 2008
| :
|
|
RED@7kVERT *8850GT*
¯
Member # 5909
|
posted
every car that comes out of FFP performes, bottom line.
19* total is nothing.....the car needs to be ran at 23-26*
the tune was very conservative. but the car is safer, runs smoother, and IS stronger than it was before the tune, that what really counts here.
so take the handheld and put 4 or 5* in it....it wll be a different car.
as far as load goes. i dont think the dyno was loadedmore or less than it would have while on the street. if that was the case, the shop at hand would have cars blowing up left and right on the street and at the track.....which IS NOT the case here.
-------------------- 2016 Mustang GT PP- Don't care lol _ _____________ _ Sold:02 Z06-11.0 @ 132 Sold:05 CTS-V-13.1 @ 114 Sold:01 Cobra Vert-12.0 @ 119
Posts: 2432 | From: -916- | Registered: Aug 2005
| :
|
|
89foxstang
¯
Member # 5908
|
posted
I agree the change from before to after is a bigger deal than the actual numbers because pretty much any dyno you go to will give you different numbers.
Posts: 825 | From: Davis | Registered: Aug 2005
| :
|
|
gtowned
¯
Member # 8156
|
posted
just join the club dustin.me and scott welcome you.
-------------------- Taking terminators off the road one at a time...
Posts: 1106 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Jan 2008
| :
|
|
RED@7kVERT *8850GT*
¯
Member # 5909
|
posted
yes. the 600rwhp or bust club!!!
lol
-------------------- 2016 Mustang GT PP- Don't care lol _ _____________ _ Sold:02 Z06-11.0 @ 132 Sold:05 CTS-V-13.1 @ 114 Sold:01 Cobra Vert-12.0 @ 119
Posts: 2432 | From: -916- | Registered: Aug 2005
| :
|
|
gtowned
¯
Member # 8156
|
posted
its 10 o clock scott
-------------------- Taking terminators off the road one at a time...
Posts: 1106 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Jan 2008
| :
|
|
RED@7kVERT *8850GT*
¯
Member # 5909
|
posted
im late....shit!!
im callin you..lol
-------------------- 2016 Mustang GT PP- Don't care lol _ _____________ _ Sold:02 Z06-11.0 @ 132 Sold:05 CTS-V-13.1 @ 114 Sold:01 Cobra Vert-12.0 @ 119
Posts: 2432 | From: -916- | Registered: Aug 2005
| :
|
|
East Bay 50
¯
Member # 8081
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by EPIK: So I finally got my car dyno tuned after the new mods. The numbers were decent, but I must say I am a bit dissapointed. My car put down 303 rwhp & 320 rwtq with an a/f ratio of 12.4-12.9 across the board. I think the timing is set @ about 19 degrees. This was on a Dyno Dynamics machine....
My mods are... =Mac LT's =Mac o/r H pipe =Bassani catback =C&L 85mm maf =3/8" intake spacer
Do these #'s sound about right??
Don't get to caught up in #s take it to the track and see how it runs. Any dyno you put that car on will spit out different #s. If it seems to run stronger and smoother than it did previously then you should be happy with the results.
-------------------- Kurgan tuned stroked and blown 347 foxbody. boost nukka!
Posts: 2699 | Registered: Dec 2007
| :
|
|
Tinner
¯
Member # 2688
|
posted
My car w/ o/r h-pipe , under-drive pulleys , RAI and cut in chokemasters made 312rwhp and 333 rwtq on a dynojet.
-------------------- 04 Comp. Orange mach 1 AED built 2.3 Whipple@17#s 605rwhp 580rwtq 10.71@131mph now with a little more power it goes 135mph+ on 18" DRs
Posts: 835 | From: santa rosa | Registered: Apr 2003
| :
|
|
2003 SVT ROUSH
¯
Member # 7976
|
posted
I Was talking to you earlyer today bout it .... i deffinetly think that its good that your A/F is good -that one of the more inportant things .. esspecially considering how your car was acting at first on the Base pull ,Hell Kieth couldnt even finish a complete pull due to how dangerous your A/F seemed .. i look at it this way , your car came in their lean and you ended up with better power with the tune alot safer and running smoother , Now ... amongst other mach's running alot greater timming numbers i dont think your car is doing bad : ) and you have the power to advance timing higher if you want the only thing i would suggest is using race gas if you up the timming a alot if you go to the track , I think your car is doing good , and by the way i think if your car verses the other mach .. being pulled on the same day same air ect.. you will be out of the fog on that : ) Now if your talking Loading down the car on the dyno then i think that there would be some special scientific approach or tool to get every damn car on the dyno with the "correct" load math....... at every shop every dyno ect ect that every tuner would do/use haha
I think you have a good tune and i have heard of crayz numbers all over the place -that sound odd on AED's dyno FFPS ,NEXT GEN ect ect ect. on and on IV had had times where i wasnt happy with FFP .. but at the end of the day Kieth has helped me out alot and hes made everything right. and hes a good dude and alot of people that have had their cars tuned through em run hard and safe .. Like my rings taking a shit with my whipple set up ... I will admit i will take most responsiblity for that cause i am the dumb ass that was running california 91 octane with 19-20 psi with a stock H/E ect and kieth did warn me at one point that i needed to go 15 and under on pump or use straight race gas at all times but since my car had been in the shop so long for other things i was too impatient and cheap and i only got to enjoy it for 2 weeks haha and the car was never running consistant and keith told me what to do but i wanted to go with the bandaids with my tune ...
Iv been kinda dissopointed with my numbers there at times but it has still beat up on cars making more power ect on the street . Ill bet when you get that mach on the road/track youll see some differences .. numbers are numbers too many small variables that add up . No matter what Dustin you still have the cleanest Torch red Mach 1 in the damn world and thats 10 rwhp right there hahaha Your cars bad ass i betcha gained numbers on your butt dyno hah [ March 14, 2008, 06:50 PM: Message edited by: 2003 SVT ROUSH ]
-------------------- Snake N Bake
Posts: 16 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Oct 2007
| :
|
|
2stangs69-91
¯
Member # 1951
|
posted
dyno numbers are overrated,they are for tunning your car on that exact day and for improvments on your car only. Bottom line if you are happy with how your car runs and performs then drive it
-------------------- 69 Mustang on hold 1991 LX hatch getting a make over 1994 F150 4X4 351 2006 Yamaha V-max 1200 Modded
Posts: 3711 | From: Redding | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
The knock sensor setup on the Mach1 is *touchy*... It's very sensitive & has the capability to not only remove, but add timing as well!
The way I determine the timing on a Mach is to run the stock timing curve on an N/A setup & dial in the A/F till it's perfect. Then read the datalogs & see what the knock sensors are doing. If they're not pulling any timing, I'll add timing. If they're pulling timing at tip-in & not anywhere else, I'll adjust as neccessary. The timing curve is 'done' when the computer is neither adding nor removing any timing during the WOT dyno run.
With that being said, simply adding 4 degrees of timing with the hand-held will do virtually nothing since the computer will remove what it feels is neccessary in order to avoid knock.....& it saves the timing values (to avoid knock) in memory and applies them. In other words, if you run 87 octane at WOT & the computer senses knock & pulls 6 degrees of timing, the next time you go WOT with 91 octane it will still remove the 6 degrees of timing. (eventually it will add it back in, but it will do it slowly, over time)
However.....add some race gas, re-load the tune with 4 more degrees of timing & the car WILL respond. Re-setting the computer (by loading in a new program) will re-set the adaptive learning & you'll start out with the computer pulling zero timing.
Oh yeah....& dyno's are for tuning....nothing more. The only #'s that matter are given to you after the 1/4 mile on the return road. [ March 14, 2008, 10:15 PM: Message edited by: 93PONY ]
-------------------- www.advancedenginedevelopment.com SCT dealer Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4266 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 93PONY: The knock sensor setup on the Mach1 is *touchy*... It's very sensitive & has the capability to not only remove, but add timing as well!
The way I determine the timing on a Mach is to run the stock timing curve on an N/A setup & dial in the A/F till it's perfect. Then read the datalogs & see what the knock sensors are doing. If they're not pulling any timing, I'll add timing. If they're pulling timing at tip-in & not anywhere else, I'll adjust as neccessary. The timing curve is 'done' when the computer is neither adding nor removing any timing during the WOT dyno run.
With that being said, simply adding 4 degrees of timing with the hand-held will do virtually nothing since the computer will remove what it feels is neccessary in order to avoid knock.....& it saves the timing values (to avoid knock) in memory and applies them. In other words, if you run 87 octane at WOT & the computer senses knock & pulls 6 degrees of timing, the next time you go WOT with 91 octane it will still remove the 6 degrees of timing. (eventually it will add it back in, but it will do it slowly, over time)
However.....add some race gas, re-load the tune with 4 more degrees of timing & the car WILL respond. Re-setting the computer (by loading in a new program) will re-set the adaptive learning & you'll start out with the computer pulling zero timing.
Oh yeah....& dyno's are for tuning....nothing more. The only #'s that matter are given to you after the 1/4 mile on the return road.
Since my car has the slight typical 32V valve tick noise coming from the driver head, The computer thought it was sesnsing knock & had it pulling about 8 degrees of timing out at WOT.It had to be that, because my car wasn't detonating at all???
We had to turn off the knock sensors for it to make the power it did??? With that said, is it safe to add anymore timing & run 91 octane???
There has to be more power potential in it???
-------------------- =91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction** =05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
East Bay 50
¯
Member # 8081
|
posted
Have you ever actually taken your car to the track Dustin? If you did, what was your time?
-------------------- Kurgan tuned stroked and blown 347 foxbody. boost nukka!
Posts: 2699 | Registered: Dec 2007
| :
|
|
93PONY
Mr. Valve Events
Member # 60
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by EPIK: quote: Originally posted by 93PONY: The knock sensor setup on the Mach1 is *touchy*... It's very sensitive & has the capability to not only remove, but add timing as well!
The way I determine the timing on a Mach is to run the stock timing curve on an N/A setup & dial in the A/F till it's perfect. Then read the datalogs & see what the knock sensors are doing. If they're not pulling any timing, I'll add timing. If they're pulling timing at tip-in & not anywhere else, I'll adjust as neccessary. The timing curve is 'done' when the computer is neither adding nor removing any timing during the WOT dyno run.
With that being said, simply adding 4 degrees of timing with the hand-held will do virtually nothing since the computer will remove what it feels is neccessary in order to avoid knock.....& it saves the timing values (to avoid knock) in memory and applies them. In other words, if you run 87 octane at WOT & the computer senses knock & pulls 6 degrees of timing, the next time you go WOT with 91 octane it will still remove the 6 degrees of timing. (eventually it will add it back in, but it will do it slowly, over time)
However.....add some race gas, re-load the tune with 4 more degrees of timing & the car WILL respond. Re-setting the computer (by loading in a new program) will re-set the adaptive learning & you'll start out with the computer pulling zero timing.
Oh yeah....& dyno's are for tuning....nothing more. The only #'s that matter are given to you after the 1/4 mile on the return road.
Since my car has the slight typical 32V valve tick noise coming from the driver head, The computer thought it was sesnsing knock & had it pulling about 8 degrees of timing out at WOT.It had to be that, because my car wasn't detonating at all???
We had to turn off the knock sensors for it to make the power it did??? With that said, is it safe to add anymore timing & run 91 octane???
There has to be more power potential in it???
Considering you're running the same timing as an 03/04 Cobra on 15psi with 91octane....Yeah, I'd say you can add some timing & get away with it. The way to do it properly is to run the car at the dragstrip & keep track of the timeslips. Once you've gotten 2 or 3 repeatable clean passes, add one degree of timing & see how the next 1 or 2 clean passes look. If you gained MPH in the 1/8th & 1/4, add another degree. Do this till MPH stops increasing & note where it ran it's best. That will be your maximum timing on 91 Octane. Also note that you can add timing in specific RPM bands....the lower RPM bands can be adjusted on the street by the seat of your pants....just be carefull & listen for any pinging.....specificly at tip-in (where the computer is transitioning from 45 degrees of part-throttle timing to 15 or so degrees of WOT timing).
-------------------- www.advancedenginedevelopment.com SCT dealer Dynotuning
(916)715-7569
Posts: 4266 | From: Fair Oaks, CA | Registered: Nov 2000
| :
|
|
*EPIK*
¯
Member # 7481
|
posted
FFP had a dyno day today, so I put my car back on the dyno to see if i could get a few more out of it. With the timing set @ 22 degrees, it put down 315rwhp & 327rwtq.
As far as my track times, i have only raced at the track once in my life & i ran a horrible 13.7 @ 104. This was on bald street tires, 18X10 wheels, & dumped road race suspension.Also at the time my only mods were a catted H, catback, & a C&L maf, & my a/f ratio & timing were all f**ked up... I feel its definitely capable of 12's, I just gotta get some seat time in, which will be happening asap....
[ March 15, 2008, 11:51 PM: Message edited by: EPIK ]
-------------------- =91 Notch:12.31@110 **Under Construction** =05 CTS-V: 418rwhp/393rwtq=13.01@111
http://www.djepikmusic.com
Posts: 6966 | From: 916 | Registered: Mar 2007
| :
|
|
Pure Stang
¯
Member # 7251
|
posted
not bad you gained a couple...
-------------------- HEART BREAKER
R.I.P Willie Guzman (5ltrsvt) you will be missed brother. 04/24/87 - 11/23/2012
90 lx 347 RIP 86 gt 89 lx- next project
Posts: 6497 | From: San Jose | Registered: Nov 2006
| :
|
|
|