T O P I C R E V I E W
|
rgtrahn
Member # 7133
|
posted
http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/wireStory?id=3647621
|
asskickn88
Member # 4957
|
posted
Damn right they should do away with lethal injection! From now on any inmate put to death should be done by kicking them in the nuts over and over till they're dead..... for woman it should be in the ovaries! Its fucking bullshit the assholes even have any say so in anything. Inmates have more rights, better health coverage and better living conditions than some hard working people in this country do.
|
phil a
Member # 6951
|
posted
It is unfortunate that in this country we allow people like these two men to have any say whatsoever about their administration of death, let alone the ability to sue the state as a way out of their penalty.
Between the two, I counted five murders, including two officers and a two-year-old boy - why should I (or anyone else) give two shits if these dudes feel pain as they go down?
|
Camaro Kid Z/28
Member # 3100
|
posted
time to dust off the electric chair!
|
essasin
Member # 4741
|
posted
Bring back the guillotine!
|
asskickn88
Member # 4957
|
posted
web page
Even though the supreme court was looking into the claims of those inmates, they didnt stop the execution of one of the worthless piles of shit at least. One thing that confuses me is this part of the story: Ten of the 37 states that use the three-drug cocktail under review by the Supreme Court have suspended its use after opponents alleged it was ineffective and cruel. Ineffective? How can anyone claim a drug proven to kill people doesnt work? Just goes to show you how fuckin stupid a person has to be to try and defend the scum of the earth.
|
essasin
Member # 4741
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by asskickn88: web page
Even though the supreme court was looking into the claims of those inmates, they didnt stop the execution of one of the worthless piles of shit at least. One thing that confuses me is this part of the story: Ten of the 37 states that use the three-drug cocktail under review by the Supreme Court have suspended its use after opponents alleged it was ineffective and cruel. Ineffective? How can anyone claim a drug proven to kill people doesnt work? Just goes to show you how fuckin stupid a person has to be to try and defend the scum of the earth.
It is BS but it's a little more tricky than that. Ineffective in this case means that the cocktail does not efficiently kill the death row inmate in an effective, "humane matter" Because a practicing physician is not present at the time of execution, the mix of the anesthetic and the paralyzing agent might not be sufficient enough to completely make the death row inmate pain free. I assume there are cases where they did not give enough anesthesia and the inmate suffered a whole shat load of pain. The potassium chloride puts you into cardiac arrest but I do know it is one of those pains that leaves you speechless.
They can not have a physician at the premises because it is against the oath. The state can not just increase the dosage because excessive administering (I think thats the term they used) is deemed cruel in itself as if they where barbarians. (Which I believe in most cases they are.) There are many factors in capitol punishment which make it one of the most debatable topics.
|