Author
|
Topic: XBOX 360 portable leaked
|
|
94gt
¯
Member # 3060
|
posted
look at the comments... "This is from a uk magazine called T3 and its an artists impression only "
-------------------- 2020 Explorer ST 2011 Silver Raptor 'Screw
Posts: 5777 | From: Beavercreek, OH | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
Mach0ne351
¯
Member # 927
|
posted
that's pretty sweet if it's gonna really get developed.
-------------------- 2001 SVT Cobra SCT Tuned by APEX Motorsports @ 317rwhp/304rwtq www.32valve.com
Posts: 1182 | From: Marina, CA | Registered: Feb 2002
| :
|
|
N8
¯
Member # 6048
|
posted
yea, I saw that. But usually the artist impression is usually from concept art for the actual system. But at the E3 it was going around about a handheld from Microsoft. So could be some validity (the leaked Xbox 360 images proved to be spot on).
Posts: 11638 | Registered: Sep 2005
| :
|
|
CLEEN 50
CAFords OG
Member # 5867
|
posted
shit, I'll take one.
-------------------- 91 GT (cafords reg date: 6/02)
Posts: 2534 | From: Peninsula | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
lxhatch5.0
¯
Member # 6319
|
posted
Shittin' on the PSP.... LOL - Hopefully Microsoft does decide to mass-produce a product like that, damn I will probably buy one.... TTT
-------------------- *NorCal
Posts: 1556 | Registered: Dec 2005
| :
|
|
TenthScale
¯
Member # 4632
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by n8y8: (the leaked Xbox 360 images proved to be spot on).
Because they were leaked by MS as part of their viral marketing campaign.
The portable drawing are just drawings.. there is another floating around with a fliptop.
Posts: 57 | From: Bay Area | Registered: Jun 2004
| :
|
|
TrueBlue
¯
Member # 1063
|
posted
They can't make a portable Xbox let alone a Xbox360 that is BS! You cannot put three processors cores that clock in at 3.2 GHz each in a portable at this time. It takes up too much power. Maybe in 10 years. [ May 11, 2006, 12:53 PM: Message edited by: TrueBlue ]
-------------------- KB '01 GT [IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v492/davis769/GIFS/samj.gif[/IMG]
Posts: 1527 | From: Around the way | Registered: Mar 2002
| :
|
|
94gt
¯
Member # 3060
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by TrueBlue: They make a portable Xbox let alone a Xbox360 that is BS! You cannot put three processors cores that clock in at 3.2 GHz each in a portable at this time. It takes up too much power. Maybe in 10 years.
That's true... Back in the day when SNES and the Genesis were duking it out and Sega released the Nomad (6 battery eater) Nintendo actually had a working protable Snes. Sadly, as you can imagine... back in the day, it would have eaten batteries like no tomorrow.
Its a cool idea, but not likely... the Xbox360's power brick puts out: 12vdc @ 16.5 amps and 5vdc @ 1 amp and the overall rated DC output? 203W.... ouch lol
-------------------- 2020 Explorer ST 2011 Silver Raptor 'Screw
Posts: 5777 | From: Beavercreek, OH | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
90gtverrt
¯
Member # 1437
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by TrueBlue: They can't make a portable Xbox let alone a Xbox360 that is BS! You cannot put three processors cores that clock in at 3.2 GHz each in a portable at this time. It takes up too much power. Maybe in 10 years.
Ah but do not forget, you can cheat on visual quality on a small screen like that so you dont need nearly the processing power to get a clean image
ITs what they did with the PSP. I think i read somewhere that it takes 1/4 the processing power to display and image on a screen like that (ill try and find the article again) because you do not need to display as many polygons on the screen to achieve the same visual effect (just an inllusion though)
MIke
Posts: 1199 | From: Livermore, CA | Registered: Jun 2002
| :
|
|
TrueBlue
¯
Member # 1063
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 306ci89Vert: quote: Originally posted by TrueBlue: They can't make a portable Xbox let alone a Xbox360 that is BS! You cannot put three processors cores that clock in at 3.2 GHz each in a portable at this time. It takes up too much power. Maybe in 10 years.
Ah but do not forget, you can cheat on visual quality on a small screen like that so you dont need nearly the processing power to get a clean image
ITs what they did with the PSP. I think i read somewhere that it takes 1/4 the processing power to display and image on a screen like that (ill try and find the article again) because you do not need to display as many polygons on the screen to achieve the same visual effect (just an inllusion though)
MIke
1/4 of the power is 50W still.
-------------------- KB '01 GT [IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v492/davis769/GIFS/samj.gif[/IMG]
Posts: 1527 | From: Around the way | Registered: Mar 2002
| :
|
|