Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
General Talk
»
“Built” - Misused Word?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by bullitt3513: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Boss 327: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Greasy: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Boss 327: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Greasy: [qb] I don't necessarily agree, if it puts down a good amount of power and can handle it without breaking, I consider that "built". [/qb][/QUOTE]So would you consider the new gt500 bone stock motors "built" [/qb][/QUOTE]No I wouldn't, I'm talking about a vehicle with aftermarket parts that is reliable and puts down some serious power. My brothers Terminator has a 2.9L Whipple running on E-85 stock long block that puts down 764RWHP and 668RWTQ, would you call that stock, not built or lightly modded? My new 408W has fully forged internals, TFS CNC'd 225 highports and I will be throwing about 12psi at it with a stock block. Should be around a reliable 650+RWHP, would you consider this stock, not built or lightly modded? [/qb][/QUOTE]I wouldnt call the Terminator built since nothing in the motor has been touched. Putting a whipple on those cars is like doing an intake swap on other stangs but the 408 is definitely built. [/qb][/QUOTE]thats an expensive intake :) [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com