T O P I C R E V I E W
|
venomous99
Member # 1917
|
posted
generally what is the difference in hp/torque when comparing these two dynos. i know the dynojet generally produces higher numbers.
|
84GT5.0
Member # 5227
|
posted
i heard the dynojets read 10-15 % higher than the mustang
|
venomous99
Member # 1917
|
posted
what are the benefits of going with one over the other if any?
|
two-gun kid
Member # 5891
|
posted
the mustang dyno adds in the weight of the car to the calculation. and adjust teh hp/tq reading
|
stoauto
Member # 2803
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by two-gun kid: the mustang dyno adds in the weight of the car to the calculation. and adjust teh hp/tq reading
that's not correct, it uses the weight and aerodynamics of the car to adjust the load put against the rollers, to simulate real world conditions. TQ is then measured through a strain gauge and HP calculated after that. Dynojets use a mass vs. speed vs. time type calculation to figure out HP then calculates TQ, this is like online HP calculators and Gtech type devices. Loaded Dyno's have advantages for tuning like being able to do part throttle and steady state tuning.
|
84GT5.0
Member # 5227
|
posted
damn thats alot of good info right there
|
two-gun kid
Member # 5891
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by stoauto: quote: Originally posted by two-gun kid: the mustang dyno adds in the weight of the car to the calculation. and adjust teh hp/tq reading
that's not correct, it uses the weight and aerodynamics of the car to adjust the load put against the rollers, to simulate real world conditions. TQ is then measured through a strain gauge and HP calculated after that. Dynojets use a mass vs. speed vs. time type calculation to figure out HP then calculates TQ, this is like online HP calculators and Gtech type devices. Loaded Dyno's have advantages for tuning like being able to do part throttle and steady state tuning.
i knew i was wrong with it i just knew it used the wieght for something
|
CDT
Member # 5004
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by stoauto: quote: Originally posted by two-gun kid: the mustang dyno adds in the weight of the car to the calculation. and adjust teh hp/tq reading
that's not correct, it uses the weight and aerodynamics of the car to adjust the load put against the rollers, to simulate real world conditions. TQ is then measured through a strain gauge and HP calculated after that. Dynojets use a mass vs. speed vs. time type calculation to figure out HP then calculates TQ, this is like online HP calculators and Gtech type devices. Loaded Dyno's have advantages for tuning like being able to do part throttle and steady state tuning.
thats really my post, didnt realize that damn Evan was logged in on my computer.. Good thing he is gone now..
|
svt306snake
Member # 1967
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 84GT5.0: damn thats alot of good info right there
soaking it all up thanks for that evan
|
MODMOTORZ
Member # 5954
|
posted
really good to know.
|
dynoguy
Member # 6457
|
posted
this is a pretty accurate reply that's not correct, it uses the weight and aerodynamics of the car to adjust the load put against the rollers, to simulate real world conditions. TQ is then measured through a strain gauge and HP calculated after that. Dynojets use a mass vs. speed vs. time type calculation to figure out HP then calculates TQ, this is like online HP calculators and Gtech type devices. Loaded Dyno's have advantages for tuning like being able to do part throttle and steady state tuning.
Thats why we use the mustang. we refer to the other one as "Internet Horsepower!"
However a good tuner can produce excellent gains on either dyno. [ February 10, 2006, 08:10 PM: Message edited by: dynoguy ]
|
50Reasons
Member # 6452
|
posted
good to know
|