Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
General Talk
»
347 vs 351
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by a302juGRnot: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Duncan Motors: [qb] 3 years plus strong bouncing off teh rev limiter with 500 rear hp. just saying. destroyed a couple hundred tires already easy. nay sayers having anything running? or have proved anything to question such a bold statement? I built and drove the 347 and 331, with dam near every head combo blown or not, from edelbrock to afr an trick flow, unless its some big bore stroked kit with over ten racks in just the long block you might come close or be better. even built Erics 9 second coupe stroked 351, that can prove a bit more. but for a budget running stock blocks, you can not beat it. unless you got something running and can prove its reliability, Im not into engine stand racing. so keep that talk in the garage where your car is on jack stands still. [/qb][/QUOTE]Dayum! I like it. [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com