T O P I C R E V I E W
|
CHICKEN_COUPE
Member # 5779
|
posted
by far this is one of the cleanest coupes i seen.
http://youtu.be/FYEcMBleRtY
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/featuredvehicles/m5lp_0507_1993_ford_mustang_notchback/index.html
|
SmallBlock Speeder
Member # 11220
|
posted
Stock my ass this fuckers got some work
|
CHICKEN_COUPE
Member # 5779
|
posted
It gotta have a built rear end and some secrets but damn this cars clean
|
NEIGHT
Member # 8741
|
posted
Sounds sticky as hell
|
98z28
Member # 8408
|
posted
Stock
|
MikeD.
Member # 8060
|
posted
I say stock HCI. Probably 4.10s, exhaust, race pulley, 1.7s, and full drag suspension. As well as some weight reduction.
|
turbo50
Member # 6700
|
posted
2885 without driver........
|
1RaW93SvT
Member # 9151
|
posted
Yay ya ya thats one of those super secret fucks that built that shit but wanted it to look stock as possible!!
They say it has mods but just lil stuff.. I call p To the car being stock! But for cleam as fuck ohhhh ya thats shits real nicely taken care of!!
|
Stangn5oh
Member # 10875
|
posted
i believe its a stock 5.0, because they already tricked me. What ppl have been doing is putting the new 5.0 motors in a foxbody. Running high elevens and average 12s.
So they are telling the truth about having a stock 5.0
|
Catfish
Member # 9529
|
posted
A new stock 5.0 motor is going to trap atleast 107+, not 103.
|
89 306
Member # 9042
|
posted
I beleve it!! He has good suspension gears exhuast slicks too lok how hard he is launching that thing..
|
Stangn5oh
Member # 10875
|
posted
Go to the drag section open up the post that says 9/14 sac raceway,"sumthn like that" At the bottom of page 1 he says im runnin a new 2011 motor
http://www.californiafords.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=001950 [ October 07, 2011, 08:58 AM: Message edited by: Stangn5oh ]
|
slow2v
Member # 9403
|
posted
eh vahli
|
Blind
Member # 3052
|
posted
seems easy to believe, my `89 with the old stock motor setup trapped 101, 13.01 et.
slicks, gears, no p/s, no a/c, alum driveshaft, stage2 clutch, 40" belt, no front swaybar, spares up front, longtubes, o/r x-pipe, dumped catback...and drive it like I hated it.
the engine was "stock" from the throttle body to the oil pan, never opened untouched. The car was not stock, there's a big difference. [ October 07, 2011, 09:58 AM: Message edited by: Blind ]
|
turbo50
Member # 6700
|
posted
Easy to believe my stock from tb to oil pan car went 13.40s at 101.3 and it was an 89 hatch.
|
50DADDY
Member # 3076
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by turbo50: Easy to believe my stock from tb to oil pan car went 13.40s at 101.3 and it was an 89 hatch.
+1 I went similar times in a stock coupe with gears.12's are very possible with a "stock" 5.0 and the right driver.
|
Notch1320
Member # 2647
|
posted
Most won't put in the effort to get every last bit out of the stock cionfigurations because it way to easy to just slap on some aftermarket parts.
|
SwEeT 03 Gt
Member # 10283
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Stangn5oh: i believe its a stock 5.0, because they already tricked me. What ppl have been doing is putting the new 5.0 motors in a foxbody. Running high elevens and average 12s.
So they are telling the truth about having a stock 5.0
frank look at the date on that video it was upload in 2008 the new 5.0 came out last year ahahaha
|
Luke87GT
Member # 21
|
posted
Famous corral stocker...
He had some carefully selected bolt-ons and his big secret was weight reduction obviously...
VERY few guys have gone 12.99 at full weight (which is a bit of an ambiguous term since there could be quite a bit of weight variation depending on model and options).
I got close, 13.08 @ 102.6, but wasn't able to break the barrier. My 93 was 3250lbs at the time.
|
Stangn5oh
Member # 10875
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by SwEeT 03 Gt: quote: Originally posted by Stangn5oh: i believe its a stock 5.0, because they already tricked me. What ppl have been doing is putting the new 5.0 motors in a foxbody. Running high elevens and average 12s.
So they are telling the truth about having a stock 5.0
frank look at the date on that video it was upload in 2008 the new 5.0 came out last year ahahaha
Gesh who looks at the dates? Hekka put me on blast na jk bro i guess i didnt catch that lol
|
CHICKEN_COUPE
Member # 5779
|
posted
have any of you guys looked at the other link and seen the pics?
|
Stangn5oh
Member # 10875
|
posted
Not me forsure, ill get around to it tho
|
92MaroonGT
Member # 10397
|
posted
Did any of you read the article? The engine itself is 'stock'. Not the car. With aftermarket suspension, tires, alum driveshaft, radiator, a/c delete, built rearend, p/s bypass, and underdrive pulleys, the engine is stock, not the car.
|
NavidR
Member # 3164
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 92MaroonGT: Did any of you read the article? The engine itself is 'stock'. Not the car. With aftermarket suspension, tires, alum driveshaft, radiator, a/c delete, built rearend, p/s bypass, and underdrive pulleys, the engine is stock, not the car.
So can you call that stock? I'd say NO!
|