T O P I C R E V I E W
|
Dag302
Member # 4682
|
posted
This is the info I got off it today. Wanted to see if someone could verify. What is a FMX auto tranny? I am not to familar with older cars. Is this a good one?
Warranty Number: 9R02H159108 Year: 9 1969 Plant: R San Jose, CA Body Series: 02 SportsRoof Engine: H 351 2v V8 Unit: 159108 159108
Miscellaneous Vehicle Data Body: 63C SportsRoof, Mach 1, Deluxe Interior Color: M5 Wimbledon White w/Flat Black Hood Trim: 3DA Dark Red Vinyl and Dark Red Knitted Vinyl, Mach 1 Luxury Date: 26C March 26, 1969 D.S.O: 72 San Jose Axle: 6 3.00:1, Conventional Trans: X FMX Automatic 63C M5 3DA 26C 72 6 X [ July 17, 2006, 01:29 AM: Message edited by: Dag302 ]
|
v-town50
Member # 4920
|
posted
FMX= garbage put a C4 in it
|
asskickn88
Member # 4957
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by v-town50: FMX= garbage put a C4 in it
Thats exactly what I said! I think he needs to do a restomod build up on it. That car would look sick dropped on chrome 18" bullets.
|
v-town50
Member # 4920
|
posted
im pretty sure mine has 625 springs in it all the way around and its sitttin on some old ass magnum 500s but the ride hieght looks sick as hell HOORAY for 69 fastbacks
|
At1Maverick69
Member # 6177
|
posted
ahhhh... pics???? I love 69 mustangs, only year mustangs came with dual headlights. I wish i didnt let go of mine.. but yah, FMX are junks, there's no performance parts for it, etc..
|
73beast351c
Member # 5397
|
posted
fmx ain't the best tranny but it ain't the worst i got it in one my grande and it has lasted forever and never has problems. But instead of going with the c4 i personally recommend the c6 it is a way stroger tranny. I have that in my mach and im running close to 500 hp on it without a rebuild. And the c6 lets you get to a higher speed before shifting. So yeah i would get rid of the fmx and get a c6 if you want it to hold power but if it is going to be all stock migh as well keep it the fmx it can't hurt
|