|
Author
|
Topic: 50% Off at pick n pull this weekend
|
CRS24WILSON
¯
Member # 9979
|
posted
 
 
Swooping a diff for my 68 mustang for $100. Not bad for 31 spline 373 gears and disc brakes. Holla!
Posts: 245 | From: SAN JOSE, CA | Registered: May 2010
| :
|
|
MaK_1967v8
¯
Member # 12187
|
posted
Lmao doing the same. 8.8 conversion!
--------------------
1967 C Code Coupe
2004 Roush Stage 2
Posts: 620 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Jul 2012
| :
|
|
CRS24WILSON
¯
Member # 9979
|
posted
nice, only thing i couldn't find was the aluminum driveshaft.. one more place tomorrow
Posts: 245 | From: SAN JOSE, CA | Registered: May 2010
| :
|
|
SikWiditMke
¯
Member # 9699
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by CRS24WILSON:
Swooping a diff for my 68 mustang for $100. Not bad for 31 spline 373 gears and disc brakes. Holla!
What kind of vehicle, did you remove this from?
--------------------
90 GT *sold*
92 GT *sold*
90 Notchback *wrecked and sold*
93 Ex-CHP notchback *Daily driver*
Posts: 558 | From: El Sobrante/Vallejo | Registered: Jan 2010
| :
|
|
CRS24WILSON
¯
Member # 9979
|
posted
1998 explorer
Posts: 245 | From: SAN JOSE, CA | Registered: May 2010
| :
|
|
Luke87GT
Lay'n more stripes
than Caltrans
Member # 21
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by CRS24WILSON:
1998 explorer
Very cool, but isn't that rearend off center, in other words one axle is longer than the other?
I seem to recall there was some reason why people typically avoid these for Mustang swaps?
How does the length compare to a fox 8.8?
Posts: 7802 | From: San Mateo | Registered: Jul 2000
| :
|
|
MaK_1967v8
¯
Member # 12187
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Luke87GT:
quote:
Originally posted by CRS24WILSON:
1998 explorer
Very cool, but isn't that rearend off center, in other words one axle is longer than the other?
I seem to recall there was some reason why people typically avoid these for Mustang swaps?
How does the length compare to a fox 8.8?
the 8" is an offset pumpkin as well.
for classics, these are an amazing swap. to swap one of these into a fox body, it would be a helluva lot more work.
not sure on the width. but a 67-68 mustang is 59.5" in axle width ( i think? i'd have to go measure ) but i believe the explorer rear end is 60". so it adds a little more stance, but its perfect on these cars.
on a 65-66. this swap is not as easy. and the 69-70. the axle looks a little too small, but can be made to work.
--------------------
1967 C Code Coupe
2004 Roush Stage 2
Posts: 620 | From: Sacramento, CA | Registered: Jul 2012
| :
|
|
CRS24WILSON
¯
Member # 9979
|
posted
What he said^
I have heard of people switching out the internals but I think its with the sn95 rear end.
Posts: 245 | From: SAN JOSE, CA | Registered: May 2010
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
