|
Author
|
Topic: Factory stock Fox "speed density"
|
quickblue302
¯
Member # 7912
|
posted
 
 
How fast in the 1/4th mile, 5sd and auto?
--------------------
Eat rice it's good for you!
Posts: 624 | From: sac | Registered: Sep 2007
| :
|
|
SIC9250
¯
Member # 8216
|
posted
Would u really wanna waste your time trying ![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif) but if so I'd say mid to high 15s ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
--------------------
Coyote_Mach1
Posts: 6959 | From: in the drivers seat. | Registered: Feb 2008
| :
|
|
1sicmaro
~ I <3 Moms ~
Member # 9734
|
posted
I had a 87 fox when it was completely stock I ran 14.1 at 97mph
Posts: 231 | From: bay area | Registered: Jan 2010
| :
|
|
warhorse58gt
¯
Member # 7702
|
posted
bone stock long block 86 capri sd.. has 3:73's full exhuast "shorties" no ac or smog pump. on dr's the car went 13.3x @ 101 ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
WOLFPACK RACING
With guns, we are 'citizens'. Without them, we are 'subjects'.
83gt 354ci sbf 9.40 @ 143
77 cobra 2 171ci 97hp of pure fury!
Posts: 4200 | From: 209 | Registered: Jun 2007
| :
|
|
J24I
¯
Member # 2598
|
posted
87 Coupe with A/C, PS, & Smog pump
14.0 with o/r xpipe & bbk headers
13.3 adding 4.10s, U/D pullies, A/C delete, 555Rs
[ May 11, 2011, 12:36 PM: Message edited by: J24I ]
--------------------
*'87 Coupe
'89 Coupe-SOLD
Posts: 2131 | From: Bay Area(925) | Registered: Mar 2003
| :
|
|
sic70stang
CAFords OG
Member # 4347
|
posted
88 coupe 14.0
--------------------
The anti-crew
1987 rolling safety violation.
Posts: 6940 | From: California | Registered: Jul 2005
| :
|
|
quickblue302
¯
Member # 7912
|
posted
Last season I ran a best of 15.1 @ 97mph with a reaction time of .646. Ive only been to the track a few times so I don't know how to play the tree, I want to be able to say that I can out run a stock 5.0 in my stock 93 Lincoln
--------------------
Eat rice it's good for you!
Posts: 624 | From: sac | Registered: Sep 2007
| :
|
|
racsirx
CAFords OG
Member # 1710
|
posted
Stock to stock, speed density is faster than a mass air car.
--------------------
88 Saleen #564
88 GT 331 NOVI2000
88 Coupe TURBO 9.75@142
95 Cobra R #75-SOLD
06 F250
13 BMW AH3
17 GT350 #5556
GOD'S NOT DEAD
Posts: 20750 | From: Concord & Pittsburg, CA | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
50DADDY
CAFords OG
Member # 3076
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by racsirx:
Stock to stock, speed density is faster than a mass air car.
+1
Posts: 4827 | From: Suckramento | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
Raelsmar
¯
Member # 9804
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by racsirx:
Stock to stock, speed density is faster than a mass air car.
Explain please...
--------------------
2010 Genesis 2.0T
If you can read this, then it's burrito time
Originally posted by 2T0NE
Niners deserve to lose
Raiders Lakers A's
Posts: 3768 | From: Vallejo, CA | Registered: Feb 2010
| :
|
|
quickblue302
¯
Member # 7912
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 50DADDY:
quote:
Originally posted by racsirx:
Stock to stock, speed density is faster than a mass air car.
+1
+2 Everyone knows that!,if you don't then hhahahahah
[ May 11, 2011, 02:11 PM: Message edited by: quickblue302 ]
--------------------
Eat rice it's good for you!
Posts: 624 | From: sac | Registered: Sep 2007
| :
|
|
wilit
Mustang Messiah
Member # 3367
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 85notch5.0:
quote:
Originally posted by racsirx:
Stock to stock, speed density is faster than a mass air car.
Explain please...
Speed density cars don't have a MAF, so they're lighter. ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
--------------------
"If a man hasn't found something worth dying for, he isn't fit to live." - Martin Luther King Jr.
Posts: 4793 | From: 37.78514° North 122.40100° West | Registered: Oct 2003
| :
|
|
Blind
2.3L
CAFords OG
Member # 3052
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by 85notch5.0:
quote:
Originally posted by racsirx:
Stock to stock, speed density is faster than a mass air car.
Explain please...
SD cars make about 10hp more compared to a stock MAF car.
I lost a few mph in trap speed when I converted mine from SD to MAF back with the old stock motor with just bolt-ons.
--------------------
89 LX Notchback ex 4cyl, 14psi
02 Harley F150, 15psi
Posts: 8521 | From: Fairfield | Registered: Jul 2003
| :
|
|
racsirx
CAFords OG
Member # 1710
|
posted
I always tell people if you not going to put a cam, or bigger injectors, or a blower there is no need to change over to mass air.
--------------------
88 Saleen #564
88 GT 331 NOVI2000
88 Coupe TURBO 9.75@142
95 Cobra R #75-SOLD
06 F250
13 BMW AH3
17 GT350 #5556
GOD'S NOT DEAD
Posts: 20750 | From: Concord & Pittsburg, CA | Registered: Aug 2002
| :
|
|
CobramanPhil
¯
Member # 2170
|
posted
SD are a tad quicker (stock vs stock). I believe the main reason is party mechanical and partly due the eec. MAF has that restriction in the middle of the MAF to sample the incoming air...plus it is a straight shot to the upper intake in a stock SD setup. That has to account for something.
As far as the eec I think the SD cars run a tad leaner and that helps just a bit.
The big deal is that for a modded car..one of the first mods is to convert to MAF:)! SD cars do not do well with big modifications...
[ May 12, 2011, 04:27 PM: Message edited by: CobramanPhil ]
Posts: 1016 | From: California, Bay Area | Registered: Dec 2002
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
