|
Author
|
Topic: info from 69 Fastback
|
Dag302
¯
Member # 4682
|
posted
 
 
This is the info I got off it today. Wanted to see if someone could verify. What is a FMX auto tranny? I am not to familar with older cars. Is this a good one?
Warranty Number: 9R02H159108
Year: 9 1969
Plant: R San Jose, CA
Body Series: 02 SportsRoof
Engine: H 351 2v V8
Unit: 159108 159108
Miscellaneous Vehicle Data
Body: 63C SportsRoof, Mach 1, Deluxe Interior
Color: M5 Wimbledon White w/Flat Black Hood
Trim: 3DA Dark Red Vinyl and Dark Red Knitted Vinyl, Mach 1 Luxury
Date: 26C March 26, 1969
D.S.O: 72 San Jose
Axle: 6 3.00:1, Conventional
Trans: X FMX Automatic
63C M5 3DA 26C 72 6 X
[ July 17, 2006, 01:29 AM: Message edited by: Dag302 ]
--------------------
04 Expedition 4X4
93 Cobra #822
96 Cobra
Posts: 2842 | From: Sacramento | Registered: Jul 2004
| :
|
|
Ty
¯
Member # 4920
|
posted
FMX= garbage put a C4 in it
--------------------
DRIVE FAST TAKE CHANCES
----------------------------
90 gt nothin special, just your average bolt ons...OUT TO PASTURE
69 fastback project car
Posts: 1400 | From: vallejo | Registered: Oct 2004
| :
|
|
asskickn88
¯
Member # 4957
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by v-town50:
FMX= garbage put a C4 in it
Thats exactly what I said! I think he needs to do a restomod build up on it. That car would look sick dropped on chrome 18" bullets. ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
--------------------
Three 540 Bimmers and a 5.0 Explorer.... got a Ford back in the stable!
It's time for the country to do what Obama's own father did.
Abandon him.
Posts: 6069 | From: Rocklin, Ca | Registered: Oct 2004
| :
|
|
Ty
¯
Member # 4920
|
posted
im pretty sure mine has 625 springs in it all the way around and its sitttin on some old ass magnum 500s but the ride hieght looks sick as hell HOORAY for 69 fastbacks ![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif)
--------------------
DRIVE FAST TAKE CHANCES
----------------------------
90 gt nothin special, just your average bolt ons...OUT TO PASTURE
69 fastback project car
Posts: 1400 | From: vallejo | Registered: Oct 2004
| :
|
|
RSCapri
¯
Member # 6177
|
posted
ahhhh... pics???? I love 69 mustangs, only year mustangs came with dual headlights. I wish i didnt let go of mine.. but yah, FMX are junks, there's no performance parts for it, etc..
--------------------
03 DSG Mach 1*SOLD
82 GT-5.0, 5spd, IRS *SOLD
79 Coupe*SOLD
84 Capri RS
94 GT *SOLD
82 Mercury Capri 5.0 *SOLD
Posts: 855 | From: Las Vegas, NV | Registered: Nov 2005
| :
|
|
89Saleen310
¯
Member # 5397
|
posted
fmx ain't the best tranny but it ain't the worst i got it in one my grande and it has lasted forever and never has problems. But instead of going with the c4 i personally recommend the c6 it is a way stroger tranny. I have that in my mach and im running close to 500 hp on it without a rebuild. And the c6 lets you get to a higher speed before shifting. So yeah i would get rid of the fmx and get a c6 if you want it to hold power but if it is going to be all stock migh as well keep it the fmx it can't hurt
--------------------
89 Saleen #310
64 1/2 coupe
73 mach 1
73 vert
66 vert
65 vert
67 coupe
67 coupe
66 coupe
Posts: 1128 | From: Oakland Hills (montclair) | Registered: Feb 2005
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
