This is topic check out this fox video in forum Drag Racing at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=001652

Posted by 91LxStang (Member # 8378) on :
 
nitrous on stock block. CRAZY

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Fox-Body-Mustang-Nitrous_104094.htm
 
Posted by BlownMach1 (Member # 5400) on :
 
stock block dont mean shit..streakmatt ran 10s for a long time on a completly stock shortblock!!! mm&ff did a turbo fox with stock motor t-body to oil pan and ran 10s too..
 
Posted by 91LxStang (Member # 8378) on :
 
still thats crazy
 
Posted by SILVER PATRON COUPE (Member # 8169) on :
 
I DONT THINK THATS COMPLETELY STOCK I HIGHLY DOUBT THAT 1 WHO KNOWS THO?
 
Posted by SmokinLX (Member # 1684) on :
 
It say's it's a stock block, so it could be built with stock part's or aftermarket but as We all know the stock block is usually the 1st thing to go "when You throw 400-500 rwhp at it" assuming You don't have a high milage engine or a bad tune. Nice times for Dude & many people have pushed the stock block into the 9's but obviously thing's can and will go wrong at this power level it is just a matter of time:eek: .
 
Posted by 91LxStang (Member # 8378) on :
 
its definately not stock, im sure he has a shit load of stuff in there on a stock block.

[ September 19, 2008, 10:54 PM: Message edited by: 91LxStang ]
 
Posted by CaliCoop (Member # 7031) on :
 
yeah that motor aint stock at all, who puts that much work into suspension and nitrous all to hope there stock motor can handle it, BS, but nice run and keep it coming [Big Grin]
 
Posted by whitelx91 (Member # 8317) on :
 
IVE SEEN A STOCK BLOCK WITH OVER 1000 HP THEY WILL LAST WITH THE RIGHT COMPONENTS AND BUILDER. THING RAN IN THE LOW 9'S ALL DAY
 
Posted by smokealot (Member # 3108) on :
 
1sicklx bro ran 11.30s w/nos & 5speed a while back.on a stock short block.of course forged pistons on the block.u can run tens consistant w/&auto but block wont last long of course.it's easy 2 go fast on a budget.phuck it why not juss to see wut it do.run a stock block til it goes,then get a better 1 [Big Grin]
 
Posted by JohnB (Member # 969) on :
 
There are a few of us that have run high 10s/low 11s all day long on stock blocks. The motor in this one may be a stock block, but that's alot of nitrous. Obviously a wet kit with a FAT tune...it looked like a freight train at the top of 2nd and 3rd.
 
Posted by 2stangs69-91 (Member # 1951) on :
 
that video is fake there is NO WAY he beat a LS car with a 302 imposible. just ask the fools on here can't happen.
 
Posted by LS1EATR (Member # 2702) on :
 
r u serious a 302 could beat an ls1 with sum mods on [burnout]
 
Posted by 2stangs69-91 (Member # 1951) on :
 
I was being a smart ass lol due to the recent love of ls engines on here lately
 
Posted by 514 Mullet (Member # 7402) on :
 
Not sure what the big deal is. Do you guys fail to realize the stock shortblocks that came in Mustangs have forged pistons in them already? Well, maybe not since you keep insisting on throwing a few grand of stroker parts into the stock blocks. I really doubt theres anything in that block besides ford pistons. The rotating assembly is not the weak link on a roller 302 so it would be a waste of money to put high dollar parts inside when the stock parts do the job just fine til the block goes.

And if it had an LS1 it would have went 9's anyways...

[ October 12, 2008, 03:39 AM: Message edited by: 514 Mullet ]
 
Posted by LS1EATR (Member # 2702) on :
 
lol
 
Posted by 2stangs69-91 (Member # 1951) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 514 Mullet:
Not sure what the big deal is. Do you guys fail to realize the stock shortblocks that came in Mustangs have forged pistons in them already? Well, maybe not since you keep insisting on throwing a few grand of stroker parts into the stock blocks. I really doubt theres anything in that block besides ford pistons. The rotating assembly is not the weak link on a roller 302 so it would be a waste of money to put high dollar parts inside when the stock parts do the job just fine til the block goes.

And if it had an LS1 it would have went 9's anyways...

damm you are so smart [Roll Eyes] please give us more of your genaric responses please. There are a few fast stock block cars around here I think and BTW he was already racing a ls camaro or firebird I don't think it touched the nines did it?

really forged pistons are you sure hmmm is that good ,I am sure none of us new that. [Big Grin]

[ October 12, 2008, 09:07 PM: Message edited by: 2stangs69-91 ]
 
Posted by 514 Mullet (Member # 7402) on :
 
At least you finally saw the light and are starting to appreciate my responses a little more. Nothing was generic about the post. I guess you just came to the stark realization that you wasted all that money putting a 331 in a stock block? Well, at least next time you'll know better at least.
 
Posted by 2stangs69-91 (Member # 1951) on :
 
I know all these years I have been running it, all the races I have won. The thousands of street miles it has has been a complete waste of money. [Roll Eyes] How many of these stock block strokers can you actualy beat with your 514? because I have no idea who you are or what car that you have.(not that I care)I just want to be sure I am not wasting my time talking to a 13 year old kid who repeats what he keeps reading on the corral. because it sure seems like it..this place is full of them. post up a pick of your junk. mine is under my name in the Pic section

[ October 13, 2008, 01:37 AM: Message edited by: 2stangs69-91 ]
 
Posted by 514 Mullet (Member # 7402) on :
 
Hmm cant say for sure since I havent raced any. But I think I could beat one or two if I tried really hard with it. Who really wants to see a picture of a 64 galaxie or a 71 mustang?
 
Posted by 2stangs69-91 (Member # 1951) on :
 
I just wanted to see why you were talking crap . For 1/2 the price of your 514 and half the weight twice the fuel milage..probably 3 times lol. You could have a 347 stock block stroker with a vortech that would pound the hell out of your 514. But you seem to feel the need to tell all the people who have succsesfully done it they are stupid for wasting there money on stock block strokers. go figure
 
Posted by 514 Mullet (Member # 7402) on :
 
Considering anything but the smallest blowers can break a stock shortblock, I guess theres really no need to put an expensive rotating assembly in it to do the same thing now is there. If you think you need a stroker to break a roller 302 block then you really shouldnt be talking to me about "how its done". You arent the only one who has built a few cars. And I saw pictures of yours. I think the work is ok but you are nowhere near my level of craftsmanship when it comes to building cars. Sorry but thats just how it is. Of course it cost a little to build it but money wasnt my concern on that. I dont know where I have seen a pump gas 347 make 800hp on nuts and cruise wherever I want it too. I dont guess you or anyone else has either? I guess if you want to get technical, my parts are capable of about 1200hp but thats not what I wanted and 460 blocks start getting unhappy around 1000hp or so anyways.

[ October 13, 2008, 02:23 AM: Message edited by: 514 Mullet ]
 
Posted by jordan_0806 (Member # 5888) on :
 
i'm having a hard time finding a blower/347 combo on pump gas making the same power as an N/A 514....anyone else?


lol

*disclaimer: I'm a ford guy too BTW*

[ October 13, 2008, 02:49 AM: Message edited by: jordan_0806 ]
 
Posted by 2stangs69-91 (Member # 1951) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 514 Mullet:
Considering anything but the smallest blowers can break a stock shortblock, I guess theres really no need to put an expensive rotating assembly in it to do the same thing now is there. If you think you need a stroker to break a roller 302 block then you really shouldnt be talking to me about "how its done". You arent the only one who has built a few cars. And I saw pictures of yours. I think the work is ok but you are nowhere near my level of craftsmanship when it comes to building cars. Sorry but thats just how it is. Of course it cost a little to build it but money wasnt my concern on that. I dont know where I have seen a pump gas 347 make 800hp on nuts and cruise wherever I want it too. I dont guess you or anyone else has either? I guess if you want to get technical, my parts are capable of about 1200hp but thats not what I wanted and 460 blocks start getting unhappy around 1000hp or so anyways.

lol 800 hp you better throw up some proof of that. I know all about building 460. Yep there are broken stock block blower engines on here everyday....do not take my word for it read the others peopl comments also. Personaly I consider putting any money in a 71 mustang a waste but that is just me so everybosy has there opinion.

BTW my 91 is a daily driven car, rain, snow,whatever even camping trips. Kind of pointless to make it a show piece.

You have never seen my work so nice try.
 
Posted by 2stangs69-91 (Member # 1951) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jordan_0806:
i'm having a hard time finding a blower/347 combo on pump gas making the same power as an N/A 514....anyone else?


lol

*disclaimer: I'm a ford guy too BTW*

lol got alot of back up there didn't you.
 
Posted by 2stangs69-91 (Member # 1951) on :
 
OK I am done arguing this, it is pointless there are to many examples on this thread you can make stock block combo's(and strokers) run the numbers and live. 514 you have no credibility in my book. Go get some then come back ,I am done with you.

[ October 13, 2008, 07:30 PM: Message edited by: 2stangs69-91 ]
 
Posted by 514 Mullet (Member # 7402) on :
 
Sorry you arent getting out with that weakass excuse. My credibility is right out there. Show me yours now. Wheres that half the weight half the price double the mileage 800hp 347 old man. I want to see it still. Stop making promises and breaking my heart.
 
Posted by 514 Mullet (Member # 7402) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 2stangs69-91:
quote:
Originally posted by 514 Mullet:
Considering anything but the smallest blowers can break a stock shortblock, I guess theres really no need to put an expensive rotating assembly in it to do the same thing now is there. If you think you need a stroker to break a roller 302 block then you really shouldnt be talking to me about "how its done". You arent the only one who has built a few cars. And I saw pictures of yours. I think the work is ok but you are nowhere near my level of craftsmanship when it comes to building cars. Sorry but thats just how it is. Of course it cost a little to build it but money wasnt my concern on that. I dont know where I have seen a pump gas 347 make 800hp on nuts and cruise wherever I want it too. I dont guess you or anyone else has either? I guess if you want to get technical, my parts are capable of about 1200hp but thats not what I wanted and 460 blocks start getting unhappy around 1000hp or so anyways.

lol 800 hp you better throw up some proof of that. I know all about building 460. Yep there are broken stock block blower engines on here everyday....do not take my word for it read the others peopl comments also. Personaly I consider putting any money in a 71 mustang a waste but that is just me so everybosy has there opinion.

BTW my 91 is a daily driven car, rain, snow,whatever even camping trips. Kind of pointless to make it a show piece.

You have never seen my work so nice try.

I saw your work in the picture section you told me to look for it in. Unless its another 1969 coupe then it must be yours. I really hope you arent trying to say Im bullshitting you about my engine that you asked about now. No reason to lie about it. Sorry. Theres a little research into my engine and Ive done quite a few 460 combinations myself so I think Im safe on this one, Could be wrong though. A lot of people hate 71-73 mach 1's. Never bothered me. I really doubt theres any other Mustangs around with the kind of suspension or drivetrain thats in this car though. I wish I would have bought a "me too" 64-70 coupe. That would have been much more original.

[ October 13, 2008, 09:58 PM: Message edited by: 514 Mullet ]
 
Posted by jordan_0806 (Member # 5888) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 2stangs69-91:
[QUOTE]OPersonaly I consider putting any money in a 71 mustang a waste but that is just me so everybosy has there opinion.

I did at first too until you see how the car pretty much shits on anything on this board as far as quality parts and craftsmanship are concerned....just like you car it is a work in progress but I think he's got more into the front and rear independent suspensions alone to make ANY mustang enthusiast bow down and beg they didn't build a 69 coupe or foxbody

[ October 13, 2008, 10:21 PM: Message edited by: jordan_0806 ]
 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com