|
Author
|
Topic: TURBO OR CHARGER PART 2
|
351R
¯
Member # 5053
|
posted
 
 
orginally posted by FRDFURY- but i wanna know whats preferred turbo or charger-but(WHY)?i wanna know why you think its better or just your thoughts in general.many post as possible-holla back
--------------------
06 R6 BLACK/RED RAVEN ALL STOCK 4 NOW
66 COUPE
88CHP/FOR SALE
"THE STREET DISCIPLE"
"SOON THEY WILL BELIEVE"
Posts: 339 | From: prideland(featuring oakland) | Registered: Nov 2004
| :
|
|
NO MANRZ
¯
Member # 566
|
posted
Both or neither. Ask this question to ten people and you'll get 10 different answers. The best one is the one you can afford and are happy with. Once you have saved up $4,000 in the bank, come back and ask this question again.
Posts: 1938 | Registered: Nov 2001
| :
|
|
S4OSHUS
¯
Member # 2918
|
posted
i have 4,000, so wich one?
--------------------
2001 audi s4 avant stage 3. 460 whp e85
2001 audi S4 stage 3 sold!
91 lx 347 sold!
90 lx notchback sold!
99 cobra sold!
Posts: 695 | From: FRISCO | Registered: Jun 2003
| :
|
|
CDT
¯
Member # 5004
|
posted
depends on application and goals.
--------------------
Custom Dyno Tuning
510.331.0608
Home of Flat Fee Tuning For All Cars, Trucks and SUV's, EFI & Carb, SCT, AFR, Dynatech, STS Turbos, N2O Refills
Posts: 1053 | From: Hayward | Registered: Nov 2004
| :
|
|
GOT 50
¯
Member # 1960
|
posted
I prefer turbo charger. More power due to less parastic drag. So same boost equals more power with turbo. Change the boost preasure on the fly with a turbo. IE dont have to change pullys to change boost. Can be done incredibly cheaply if you have a welder and dont mind sourcing some parts from the junkyard.easier on the crank. dont have to worry about belt slippage.blow off valve sounds sick.
Posts: 2139 | From: SF/DALY CITY/MILLBRAE | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
306Coupe
¯
Member # 4988
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by NO MANRZ:
Both or neither. Ask this question to ten people and you'll get 10 different answers. The best one is the one you can afford and are happy with. Once you have saved up $4,000 in the bank, come back and ask this question again.
lol, how you know he ain't got $4000 in the bank? He actually purchased a Procharger F1R (which cost more than $4000) but just wanted everyone's imput. Also if you don't have an answer, then don't answer. The easy, uneducated response is always "it depends on what you want to spend", this is true but that wasn't the question. He wanted reasons behind everyone's responses.
--------------------
1987 Coupe- Not stock
Posts: 2039 | From: Rocklin | Registered: Oct 2004
| :
|
|
|
|
TRIXSNK
¯
Member # 2844
|
posted
I think a lot of it does have to do with what you want out of the car HP, power curve, all out drag car , streetable driver, etc.
I'm in the market to put a single on a fox body now that the Cobra's gone ![[Frown]](frown.gif)
Just don't know if i want to piece together a kit myself or purchase a kit from one of the companies that offer them.
Also it just like any other recipe for power as you will probably need the fp, inj, maf, tune etc
to extract the hp safely.
The previous mentioned kit does not include any of the fuel requirements i don't think.
Hellions kit seems like a well done kit as it keeps smog pump and a/c so they say and requires the least modification to make the system fit correctly.
--------------------
9 Sec EVO 9 is GONE!
New project in the works.......
Posts: 3740 | From: Bay Area | Registered: May 2003
| :
|
|
351R
¯
Member # 5053
|
posted
thanks for the replys.im not going to copy/paste the comment made or who made the weak a$$ comment.i really wanted to know why people like what they like,i have never had turbo anything but i have had a vortec v2-sold it-i currently have a procharger f1r intercooled-to the idiot that made the gay comment(get $4000 and come back)the kit goes for over 6k.anyway i really wanted know should i sell my kit and go turbo because its better-or not.but naw im not selling nothing-my procharger set up is ''dumb a$$ clean''in conclusion please comment only if it pertains to you-thank you
--------------------
06 R6 BLACK/RED RAVEN ALL STOCK 4 NOW
66 COUPE
88CHP/FOR SALE
"THE STREET DISCIPLE"
"SOON THEY WILL BELIEVE"
Posts: 339 | From: prideland(featuring oakland) | Registered: Nov 2004
| :
|
|
92stangLX
¯
Member # 3252
|
posted
Superchargers are cheaper, easier to install, and are (in most cases) smog legal.
Turbos are more efficient (ie no pulleys).
Both have plenty of power potential.
Posts: 5302 | From: San Francisco | Registered: Sep 2003
| :
|
|
Fostang
¯
Member # 3752
|
posted
Come back when you have 30g's to spend lol ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
Anyways if money didn't matter I would go turbo hands down. 90% efficiency compared to 60% of a supercharger.
--------------------
67' Fastback TT 408
67' Camaro Lsx
64' Corvette Fuelie
57' Chevy Bel Air Lsx
68’ Pony Convertible
66’ Pony Coupe
Posts: 3012 | From: Stockton/Danville | Registered: Nov 2003
| :
|
|
|
|
351R
¯
Member # 5053
|
posted
all how cute
--------------------
06 R6 BLACK/RED RAVEN ALL STOCK 4 NOW
66 COUPE
88CHP/FOR SALE
"THE STREET DISCIPLE"
"SOON THEY WILL BELIEVE"
Posts: 339 | From: prideland(featuring oakland) | Registered: Nov 2004
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
