This is topic Roush 200 heads? in forum Tech Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=006928
Posted by saleenmomo89 (Member # 3251) on :
 
Are they any good,
has anyone heard good things, or bad things
 
Posted by 94Blackout (Member # 2541) on :
 
Spec page in PDF format

[ February 13, 2004, 12:55 PM: Message edited by: 94Blackout ]
 
Posted by HDS (Member # 2109) on :
 
How well can a mostly stock 302 handle this heads?
 
Posted by DropTopFox (Member # 1689) on :
 
well itsays right there they require an agressive cam and improvements to the exhaust and intake. I would like to know how much CFM they flow [Confused]
 
Posted by 94Blackout (Member # 2541) on :
 
Flowbench Results from Gromm Racing Heads
 
Posted by 1SLOWLX (Member # 558) on :
 
I don't see any you need a subscription
 
Posted by saleenmomo89 (Member # 3251) on :
 
if you get heads,
what else must you get?
 
Posted by 66 AC COBRA (Member # 904) on :
 


[ February 16, 2004, 11:20 PM: Message edited by: 66 AC COBRA ]
 
Posted by DropTopFox (Member # 1689) on :
 
still have yet too see those cfm numbers [Confused]
 
Posted by DropTopFox (Member # 1689) on :
 
Bueller [Confused]
 
Posted by Chosen1 (Member # 1906) on :
 
without having seen the flow numbers, let me tell you that flow numbers (since most people only look at peak flow) do not mean everything. just because a head flows 330 cfm at .650 does not make it a better head than a gt40 for a stock motor.

focus on lift where the motor will mostly be running.
 
Posted by DropTopFox (Member # 1689) on :
 
I understand this, Just wondering how this smog legal 200cc head compares to the AFR 205 and Edelbrock Victor Jr which has 210cc's, that both are not smog legal [patriot]
 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com