This is topic flowmaster mufflers 2chamber vs 3 chamber in forum Tech Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=006735
Posted by 4.6GT (Member # 2643) on :
 
i currently have 2002 gt with pro chamber and have 2 chamber flow masters im considering going to 3 chamber because they are more quite are they better performance wise or are the 2 chambers better? or any suggestions to a better quieter but better performance than 2 chamber flowmasters? thanx
 
Posted by DropTopFox (Member # 1689) on :
 
Dynomax and Magnaflow seem to be popular for quiet driving these days, then they rip when you get on it just like any other muffler [patriot]
 
Posted by Chosen1 (Member # 1906) on :
 
I installed a catted h-pipe, 2 chambers with tailpipes on my 93 Cobra.

I ran hooker headers, a mac catted h-pipe, and 3 chambers with turndowns on my 89 GT.

They were about equal volume.

I just put Magnaflows with turndowns on my fastback, and its about as loud as my GT was at idle, and between a 1 and 2 chamber at WOT.
 
Posted by QWICK46 (Member # 1843) on :
 
Yeap,

I've got a Prochamber with a Magnaflow Catback on my car. It's quiet when I need it to be, but I can make it as loud and aggressive as I want with my right foot. Also doesn't give me a headache droning down the highway.
 
Posted by 4.6GT (Member # 2643) on :
 
k thanx guys what woud a pro chamber sound with borla mufflers?

[ January 29, 2004, 11:34 PM: Message edited by: 4.6GT ]
 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com