Author
|
Topic: what intake...?
|
cobraman_1994
¯
Member # 467
|
posted
matches the edelbrock victor jr heads on a 351W?
-------------------- 86 GT
Posts: 4882 | From: eldorado hills | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
doesn't edelbrock make a 351 intake now?
-------------------- 1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
cobraman_1994
¯
Member # 467
|
posted
for efi?
-------------------- 86 GT
Posts: 4882 | From: eldorado hills | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
btw sounds like we might be building the same motor. I can't decide whether to keep the 302 or swap at this point.... but if I do edelbrock vic jr. heads are going on no doubt!
-------------------- 1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
cobraman_1994
¯
Member # 467
|
posted
come on, dont be a pussy. get the 351W besidess, then we can learn form eachohers mistakes. [ June 29, 2003, 05:00 PM: Message edited by: cobraman_1994 ]
-------------------- 86 GT
Posts: 4882 | From: eldorado hills | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
BlackNGold
CaliforniaFords.com Moderator
Member # 655
|
posted
Edelbrock's 5.8/351W, Base only is part #3884...I suggest a Performer RPM to go on top of that...
It really depends on where you want your powerband and how high you rev your motor...
-------------------- -SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT-
Posts: 5132 | From: Bay Area, CA | Registered: Dec 2001
| :
|
|
cobraman_1994
¯
Member # 467
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Black94 5.0: Edelbrock's 5.8/351W, Base only is part #3884...I suggest a Performer RPM to go on top of that...
It really depends on where you want your powerband and how high you rev your motor...
will the truck one work in a mustang? i dont see why not, its a truck motor
-------------------- 86 GT
Posts: 4882 | From: eldorado hills | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
|
92coupe
¯
Member # 1957
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by st5150: TFS-R
thats a lot of intake if its a NA setup. id say track heat, systemax,rpm 2.
-------------------- 94-GT BLOWN & STROKED
Posts: 1209 | From: antioch | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
cobraman_1994
¯
Member # 467
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by 92coupe: quote: Originally posted by st5150: TFS-R
thats a lot of intake if its a NA setup. id say track heat, systemax,rpm 2.
for a 351W? those seem like better 302 ones. who was it that said "put 302 parts on your 351 and expect 302 horsepower."
-------------------- 86 GT
Posts: 4882 | From: eldorado hills | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
Jeff S
¯
Member # 371
|
posted
Victor 5.8
-------------------- '90 Mustang LX: 8.53 @ 157.92 w/ 1.33 60' on DR's '10 ZR1: FOR SALE '14 E63 S: RENNtech ECU '04 Gallardo: UGR TTG
Posts: 2121 | From: San Jose, CA | Registered: Aug 2001
| :
|
|
mustanggt5091
All I need is.....
Member # 444
|
posted
I have been running into the same problem with picking my 351w intake, I am running TEA stage 3 AFR 185's though! Rick Anderson recommends the Victor 5.8, CHP recommends there spyder, and everyone else says go with the TFSR! I dont know what to do! I am running N2O, are you all motor, Blown, or N20 also? If you can find some helpfull hints let me know!
-------------------- 88 GT 357w (SOLD):( 06 Limited Edition R6 !!!!!
Posts: 2353 | From: Fairfield / Santa Rosa , Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
JoeT
¯
Member # 298
|
posted
go carb you beatch!
-------------------- 1984 Ford Tempo AOD--- RIP
Posts: 6785 | From: San Jose | Registered: Jun 2001
| :
|
|
forced331
¯
Member # 1270
|
posted
Victor 5.8 or the tfs-R will be perfect for your setup don't go any smaller than these intakes.
-------------------- 1992 Ford Mustang LX (Original Owner)"Titanium Frost" 331stroker S-Trim, 5spd
2014 Ford Mustang GT- daily driver
Posts: 1154 | From: Sonoma County | Registered: May 2002
| :
|
|
cobraman_1994
¯
Member # 467
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by shade-tree: go carb you beatch!
that sure is sounding nice right now.
fuck it, carb it is
i guess smog was out the window with the 351 anyways
-------------------- 86 GT
Posts: 4882 | From: eldorado hills | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
White95GT
¯
Member # 1915
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by forced331: Victor 5.8 or the tfs-R will be perfect for your setup don't go any smaller than these intakes.
Thats what i was thinking
Posts: 585 | From: The Bay | Registered: Oct 2002
| :
|
|
VNMKING
¯
Member # 480
|
posted
Well david, you finally used your brain. Carb all the way on the 351. Have a FI 302 for smog...
-------------------- 65’ Coupe 94’ Cobra "VNMKING"
Posts: 1000 | From: Roseville, CA | Registered: Oct 2001
| :
|
|
cobraman_1994
¯
Member # 467
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by T-TopTerror: Well david, you finally used your brain. Carb all the way on the 351. Have a FI 302 for smog...
i knew it was there for something
did you ever get those 19's?
edit: did you and karl get his car running right yet? [ July 08, 2003, 06:58 PM: Message edited by: cobraman_1994 ]
-------------------- 86 GT
Posts: 4882 | From: eldorado hills | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
cobraman_1994
¯
Member # 467
|
posted
do i need to do anything to my car for the carb? like to the fuel tank?
whats a good carb to go with? demon? edelbrock? holley?
-------------------- 86 GT
Posts: 4882 | From: eldorado hills | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
mustanggt5091
All I need is.....
Member # 444
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by cobraman_1994: i guess smog was out the window with the 351 anyways
Thats funny, mine does just fine!
-------------------- 88 GT 357w (SOLD):( 06 Limited Edition R6 !!!!!
Posts: 2353 | From: Fairfield / Santa Rosa , Ca | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|
cobraman_1994
¯
Member # 467
|
posted
it shouldnt. its kinda easy to tell if a 351W is under the hood. if you know what your looking at that is. but some dont
-------------------- 86 GT
Posts: 4882 | From: eldorado hills | Registered: Sep 2001
| :
|
|