This is topic Who holds the Nor Cal NA 302 based ET record? in forum Tech Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=004603

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 
What is the 60ft/et/mph? How much does the car weigh? What is the combo? Where does the car peak?

With the following...
- Naturally aspirated
- 302 based (stroker is ok)
- 11:1 or less compression
- Hydro-roller cam

Anything goes aside form these 4 things...
Lets hear it.
Luke

[ June 27, 2003, 09:24 PM: Message edited by: Luke87GT ]
 

---

Posted by FasterDamnit (Member # 442) on :
 
Excellent question! EFI or carbed?
Mike C is down to 11.30's w/ poor traction. Not sure how many locals are actually doing the max effort NA 5.0/stroker route.
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 
Jim, I'm more interested in EFI, but I'd like to hear both.

What is Mike's combo?
Luke
 

---

Posted by FasterDamnit (Member # 442) on :
 
Umm-
347, AFR 185's w/ port work (I think), ported Performer RPM, custom cam. I'm sure Aaron or Mike will correct any mistakes. Over 400 hp and tq at the wheels. Not bad.
 

---

Posted by 92coupe (Member # 1957) on :
 
nevermind, to much compresion for what you asked.

[ June 27, 2003, 11:15 PM: Message edited by: 92coupe ]
 

---

Posted by shade-tree (Member # 298) on :
 
doesn't Rhett's 347 combo make 400 to the wheels too?
 

---

Posted by AaronC (Member # 86) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:
What is the 60ft/et/mph? How much does the car weigh? What is the combo? Where does the car peak?

With the following...
- Naturally aspirated
- 302 based (stroker is ok)
- 11:1 or less compression
- Hydro-roller cam

Anything goes aside form these 4 things...
Lets hear it.
Luke

---

347 11:1 Compression

AFR 185's very lightly cleaned up

Cam 244/240 108 LSA 110 ICL .576/.550something
Actually driveability is still ok with 3.73's. His mufflers are more undrivable along with solid motor mounts.

Matching ported RPM intake

Anderson NA powerpipe, 80mm MAF, 75mm TB, 42 lb injectors, Autologic chip

1 3/4 BBK headers, 3" DR. Gas X pipe, Dynomax race bullet muffs

think that's pretty much it.

His ET's will get better but best is 11.3 with a 1.73 60'. It traps 122-124 at 3300 lbs. On the dyno it made 414 RWHP at 5900/6000 RPM SAE corrected and 416 RWTQ at 5000. It made 400+ RWHP from 5100-6500 RPM. It just makes tremendous power everywhere. lights the tires off on 2nd gear stabs with Nittos. I could arrange a ride for you
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by AaronC:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:
What is the 60ft/et/mph? How much does the car weigh? What is the combo? Where does the car peak?

With the following...
- Naturally aspirated
- 302 based (stroker is ok)
- 11:1 or less compression
- Hydro-roller cam

Anything goes aside form these 4 things...
Lets hear it.
Luke

---

347 11:1 Compression

AFR 185's very lightly cleaned up

Cam 244/240 108 LSA 110 ICL .576/.550something
Actually driveability is still ok with 3.73's. His mufflers are more undrivable along with solid motor mounts.

Matching ported RPM intake

Anderson NA powerpipe, 80mm MAF, 75mm TB, 42 lb injectors, Autologic chip

1 3/4 BBK headers, 3" DR. Gas X pipe, Dynomax race bullet muffs

think that's pretty much it.

His ET's will get better but best is 11.3 with a 1.73 60'. It traps 122-124 at 3300 lbs. On the dyno it made 414 RWHP at 5900/6000 RPM SAE corrected and 416 RWTQ at 5000. It made 400+ RWHP from 5100-6500 RPM. It just makes tremendous power everywhere. lights the tires off on 2nd gear stabs with Nittos. I could arrange a ride for you

---

Pretty remarkable. I wonder what the driveability is like (idle, 1800rpm cruise characteristics, etc). You guys could make make a business giving joy rides in that thing. Like a Great America ride...
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 
Also, Aaron is this car the record holder for the criteria I gave above? Anyone faster?

Looks like there is a 10 in there if he can get that launch sorted out... 1.5X region
Luke
 

---

Posted by KCmustangboy (Member # 1927) on :
 
302 stock non stroker would be John M. 11.92
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by KCmustangboy:
302 stock non stroker would be John M. 11.92

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by FasterDamnit:
Here's Rehtt's rear whell, but I think he has made a change since then.

88 LX
342, AFR 185's, XE274, Performer RPM Intake, 70mm TB, FMS 70mm MAF, stock air box, 1 5/8 LT's, 3.73's

365 RWHP 380 RWTQ
11.49 119.0 mph

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by FasterDamnit:
Here's Rehtt's rear whell, but I think he has made a change since then.

88 LX
342, AFR 185's, XE274, Performer RPM Intake, 70mm TB, FMS 70mm MAF, stock air box, 1 5/8 LT's, 3.73's

365 RWHP 380 RWTQ
11.49 119.0 mph

---

ya Jim, i put that big pulley on my pwr steering.....uuuuuhhh
 

---

Posted by jmcclesk (Member # 1355) on :
 
weight race ready with driver and gas 3070-3100 lbs and it put out 335-337 to the rear wheels. It has been so long i cant rember which one 335 or 337. best time 11.92@115.188 with a 1.63 60 foot time.
kc mustang JON not JOHN.
Arronc- how much does mike charge for a ride ill pay

[ June 28, 2003, 09:44 PM: Message edited by: jmcclesk ]
 

---

Posted by KCmustangboy (Member # 1927) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by jmcclesk:
weight race ready with driver and gas 3070-3100 lbs and it put out 335-337 to the rear wheels. It has been so long i cant rember which one 335 or 337. best time 11.92@115.188 with a 1.63 60 foot time.
kc mustang JON not JOHN.
Arronc- how much does mike charge for a ride ill pay

---

Sorry JON, Stupidity must run in the family
 

---

Posted by AaronC (Member # 86) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by jmcclesk:
Arronc- how much does mike charge for a ride ill pay

---